Modeling Software Component Criticality Using a Machine Learning Approach

  • Miyoung Shin
  • Amrit L. Goel
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3397)


During software development, early identification of critical components is of much practical significance since it facilitates allocation of adequate resources to these components in a timely fashion and thus enhance the quality of the delivered system. The purpose of this paper is to develop a classification model for evaluating the criticality of software components based on their software characteristics. In particular, we employ the radial basis function machine learning approach for model development where our new, innovative algebraic algorithm is used to determine the model parameters. For experiments, we used the USA-NASA metrics database that contains information about measurable features of software systems at the component level. Using our principled modeling methodology, we obtained parsimonious classification models with impressive performance that involve only design metrics available at earlier stage of software development. Further, the classification modeling approach was non-iterative thus avoiding the usual trial-and-error model development process.


Radial Basis Function Classification Model Software Component Test Error Machine Learn Approach 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Shin, M., Goel, A.L.: A. Empirical Data Modeling in Software Engineering using Radial Basis Functions. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering (28), 567–576 (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Khoshgoftaar, T., Seliya, N.: Comparative Assessment of Empirical Software Quality Classification Techniques: An Empirical Case study. Software Engineering 9, 229–257 (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Khoshgoftaar, T., Yuan, X., Aleen, E.B., Jones, W.D., Hudepohl, J.P.: Uncertain Classification of Fault-Prone Software Modules. Empirical Software Engineering 7, 297–318 (2002)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lanubile, F., Lonigro, A., Vissagio, G.: Comparing Models for identifying Fault-Prone Software Components. In: 7th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, Rockville, Maryland, June 1995, pp. 312–319 (1995)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pedrycz, W.: Computational Intelligence as an Emerging Paradigm of Software Engineering. In: Fourteenth International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, Ischia, Itlay, July 2002, pp. 7–14 (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pighin, M., And Zamolo, R.: A Predictive Metric based on Discriminant Statistical Analysis. In: International Conference on Software Engineering, Boston, MA, pp. 262–270 (1997)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhang, D., And Tsai, J.J.P.: Machine Learning and Software Engineering. Software Quality journal 11, 87–119 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shull, F., Mendonce, M.G., Basili, V., Carver, J., Maldonado, J.C., Fabbri, S., Travassos, G.H., Ferreira, M.C.: Knowledge-Sharing Issues in Experimental Software Engineering. Empirical Software Engineering 9, 111–137 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goel, A.L., Shin, M.: Tutorial on Software Models and Metrics. In: International Conference on Software Engineering, Boston, MA (1997)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Han, J., Kamber, M.: Data Mining. Morgan Kauffman, San Francisco (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shin, M., Goel, A.L.: Design and Evaluation of RBF Models based on RC Criterion, Technical Report (2003), Syracuse University Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Khoshgoftaar, T., et al.: Uncertain Classification of Fault Prone Software Modules. Empirical Software Engineering 7, 297–318 (2002)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miyoung Shin
    • 1
  • Amrit L. Goel
    • 2
  1. 1.Future Technology Research Division, ETRIBioinformatics TeamDaejeonKorea
  2. 2.Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceSyracuse UniversitySyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations