Skip to main content

A Methodology of Visual Modeling Language Evaluation

  • Conference paper
SOFSEM 2005: Theory and Practice of Computer Science (SOFSEM 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 3381))

Abstract

In order to achieve more maturity inVisual Modeling Language (VML) engineering, effective methodologies of VML evaluation are necessary. This paper proposes a methodology for evaluating VML from a cognitive perspective. It discusses methodological problems of applying psychological results for VML evaluation. It then presents research on a CD-VML methodology that is based on cognitive dimensions (CD). This research covers analysis of the application of CDs in the context of VMLs, empirical studies of UML with an original CD questionnaire, customization of CDs for VML evaluation and empirical studies of use cases with a CD-VML-UC questionnaire – a product of the CD-VML methodology for use case diagram.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blackwell, A.F., Britton, C., Cox, A., Green, T.R.G., Gurr, C.A., Kadoda, G.F., Kutar, M., Loomes, M., Nehaniv, C.L., Petre, M., Roast, C., Roes, C., Wong, A., Young, R.M.: Cognitive Dimensions of Notations: Design tools for cognitive technology. In: Beynon, M., Nehaniv, C.L., Dautenhahn, K. (eds.) CT 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2117, pp. 325–341. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Blackwell, A.F., Green, T.R.G.: A Cognitive Dimensions questionnaire optimised for users. In: Proceedings of the Twelth Annual Meeting of the Psychology of Programming Interest (PPIG) Group, pp. 137–152 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bobkowska A.E.: Cognitive Dimensions Questionnaire Applied to Visual Modelling Language Evaluation - a Case Study. In: Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Workshop of the PPIG (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clarke, S.: Evaluating a new programming language. In: Kadoda, G. (ed.) Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the PPIG, pp. 275–289 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cox, K.: Cognitive Dimensions of use cases: feedback from a student questionnaire. In: Proceedings of the Twelth Annual Meeting of the PPIG (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Detienne, F.: Software Design – Cognitive Aspects. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Genova, G., Llorens, J., Quintana, V.: Digging into Use Case Relationships. In: Jézéquel, J.-M., Hussmann, H., Cook, S. (eds.) UML 2002. LNCS, vol. 2460, p. 115. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Green, T.R.G.: Cognitive dimensions of notations. In: People and Computers, pp. 443–460. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Isoda, S.: A Critique of UML’s Definition of the Use-Case Class. In: Stevens, P., Whittle, J., Booch, G. (eds.) UML 2003. LNCS, vol. 2863, pp. 280–294. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Kutar, M., Britton, C., Wilson, J.: Cognitive Dimensions: An experience report. In: Blackwell, A.F., Bilotta, E. (eds.) Proceedings of the Twelth Annual Meeting of the Psychology of Programming Interest Group, pp. 81–98 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shneiderman, B.: Software Psychology. Human Factors in Computer and Information Systems. Winthrop Publishers Inc. (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Triffitt, E., Khazaei, B.: A Study of Usability of Z Formalism Based on Cognitive Dimensions. In: Kuljis, J., Baldwin, L., Scoble, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the PPIG, pp. 15–28 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tukiainen, M.: Evaluation of the Cognitive Dimensions Questionnaire and Some Thoughts about the Cognitive Dimensions of Spreadsheet Calculation. In: Kadoda, G. (ed.) Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the PPIG, pp. 291–301 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Unified Modeling Language v. 1.4, available at, http://www.omg.org/uml/

  15. Wegmann, A., Genilloud, G.: The Role of Roles in Use Case Diagrams. In: Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on the Unified Modeling Language, York, UK (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bobkowska, A. (2005). A Methodology of Visual Modeling Language Evaluation. In: Vojtáš, P., Bieliková, M., Charron-Bost, B., Sýkora, O. (eds) SOFSEM 2005: Theory and Practice of Computer Science. SOFSEM 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3381. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30577-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30577-4_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-24302-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30577-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics