Skip to main content

The Roles of Ontology and Metadata Registry for Interoperable Databases

  • Conference paper
Distributed Computing and Internet Technology (ICDCIT 2004)

Abstract

In order to make multiple autonomous databases to interoperate effectively, semantic heterogeneities have to be detected and resolved. Another difficulty is that users can be allowed to handle information easily from different heterogeneous databases that refer to the same real-world entity. To solve these problems, in this paper, I present an information integration system for interoperable databases using metadata registry and ontology. A metadata registry is a place to keep facts about characteristics of data that are necessary for data sharing and exchange in a specific domain. An ontology defines concepts and relations among concepts. The purpose of the proposed architecture is to define an information integration model, which combines characteristics of both standard specification of metadata registry and functionality of ontology for the concepts and relations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ISO/IEC, ISO/IEC FDIS 11179: Information technology-Specification and standardization of data elements (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Uschold, M., Gruninger, M.: Ontologies: Principles, Methods and Applications. Knowledge Engineering Review (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hull, R.: Managing semantic heterogeneity in databases: a theoretical prospective. In: Proc. 16th ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems, pp. 51–61 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Batini, C., Lenzerini, M., Navathe, S.B.: A comparative analysis of methodologies for database schema integration. ACM Computing Surveys 18(4) (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ouksel, A.M., Sheth, A.P.: Semantic Interoperability in Global Information Systems: A Brief Introduction to the Research Area and the Special Section. SIGMOD Record 28(1), 5–12 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Miller, G.A., Beckwith, R., Fellbaum, C., Gross, D., Miller, K.: Five Papers on WordNet, CSL Reort 43, Cognitive Systems Laboratory, Priceton Univ. (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Garcia-Solaco, M., Saltor, F., Castellanos, M.: Semantic Heterogeneity in Multidatabase Systems. In: Bukhres, O.A., Elmagarmid, A.K. (eds.) Object-Oriented Multidatabase Systems: A Solution for Advanced Applications, pp. 129–202. Prentice Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gruber, T.R.: Toward Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Panti, M., Spalazzi, L., Giretti, A.: A Case-Based Approach to Information Integration. In: Proceedings of the 26th VLDB conference (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hammer, J., Garcia-Molina, H.H., Ireland, K., Papakonstantinou, Y., Ullman, J., Widom, J.: Information translation, mediation, and mosaic-based browsing in the tsimmis system. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bigus, J.P., Bigus, J.: Constructing Intelligent agents with Java. Wiley Computer Publishing, Chichester (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ahmed, R., De Smedt, P., Du, W., Kent, W., Ketabchi, M.A., Litwin, W.A., Rafli, A., Shan, M.C.: The Pegasus heterogenous multidatabase system. IEEE Computer (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Collet, C., Huhns, M., Shen, W.: Resource Integration Using a Large Knowledge Base in Carnot. IEEE Computer (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Knoblock, C.A., et al.: Modeling Web Sources for Information Integration. In: Proceedings of 11th Nat’l Conference on Artificial Intelligence (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Adali, S., Candan, K.S., Papakonstantinou, Y., Subrahmanian, V.S.: Query caching and optimization in distributed mediator systems. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nodine, M., Fowler, J., Perry, B.: An Overview of Active Information Gathering in InfoSleuth. InfoSlueth Group (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lee, JO. et al. (2004). The Roles of Ontology and Metadata Registry for Interoperable Databases. In: Ghosh, R.K., Mohanty, H. (eds) Distributed Computing and Internet Technology. ICDCIT 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3347. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30555-2_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30555-2_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-24075-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30555-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics