The Locus of Word Length and Frequency Effect in Comprehending English Words by Korean-English Bilinguals and Americans

  • Kichun Nam
  • Yoonhyong Lee
  • Chang H. Lee
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3316)


Three experiments on English word recognition have been conducted in order to investigate the locus of word length effect, as well as the locus of the frequency effect. The other aim of this study was to investigate whether the processing of English word recognition for Koreans is similar to that of Americans’ or not in the respect of word length and frequency effects. In all experiments, the interacting pattern between length and frequency was examined. If the interaction is additive, length and frequency affect separate stages. Experiment 1 showed that degradation of stimuli by mixing the case had no effect on word length and frequency. The processing patterns between the naming and the lexical decision (Experiment 2), and between the naming and the delayed naming (Experiment 3) were similar for both word length and frequency effects. In addition, Korean bilinguals showed similar length and frequency effect as American. The locus of length effect is located at the lexical access and a post-lexical stage. Because word frequency and length are two most influential lexical variables in word recognition, this result indicates that Korean bilingual access the lexical system of English as much the similar way as American.


Word Recognition Lexical Decision Word Frequency Word Length English Word 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Whaley, G.P.: Word-nonword classification time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 17, 143–154 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chumbley, J.I., Balota, D.A.: A word’s meaning affects the decision in lexical decision. Memory & Cognition 12, 590–606 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lee, H., Nam, K., Kim, H.: ERP 에 나타난 한글, 한자, 영어 단어 재인의 차이. 한국 인지과학회 7, 111-140 (1996)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Forster, K.I., Chambers, S.M.: Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 12, 627–635 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hudson, P.T.W., Bergman, M.W.: Lexical knowledge in word recognition: Word length and word frequency in naming and lexical decision tasks. Journal of Memory and Language 24, 46–58 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Monsell, S., Doyle, M.C., Haggard, P.N.: Effect of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: Where are they? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 18, 452–467 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee, Y., Lee, J., Hwang, Y.: Word regularity effect in English word recognition of Korean. Korean Journal of foreign language education 7(1), 25–44 (2000)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    McClelland, J.L., Rumelhart, D.E.: An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review 88, 375–407 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Beauvillain, C.: Orthographic and lexical constraints in bilingual word recognition. In: Harris, R.J. (ed.) Cognitive Processing in bilinguals, pp. 221–235. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V, Amsterdam (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heuven, W., Dijkstra, T., Grainger, J.: Orthographic neighborhood effects in bilingual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 39, 458–483 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kroll, J.F.: Accessing conceptual representations words in a second language. In: Schreuder, R., Weltens, B. (eds.) The bilingual lexicon, pp. 53–81. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam/Philadelphia (1993)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    De Groot, A.M.B.: Word Type Effects in Bilingual Processing Tasks: Support for a Mixed-Representational System. In: Schreuder, R., Weltens, B. (eds.) The Bilingual Lexicon, pp. 27–51. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam/Philadelphia (1993)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Katz, L., Frost, R.: The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In: Frost, R., Katz, L. (eds.) Orthography, Phonology, Morphology and Meaning, pp. 67–84. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V, Northholland (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Simpson, G.B., Kang, H.: The flexible use of phonological information in word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 33, 319–331 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Seidenberg, S.: The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders. method. In: Koster, W.G. (ed.) Attention and Performance II, Amsterdam, North Holland (1969)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Besner, D., Smith, M.C.: Models of visual word recognition: When obscuring the stimulus yields a clearer view. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 18(3), 468–482 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kucera, H., Francis, W.N.: Computational analysis of present-day American English. Brown university press, Providence (1967)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kichun Nam
    • 1
  • Yoonhyong Lee
    • 2
  • Chang H. Lee
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyKorea UniversityKorea
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyPusan National UniversityKorea

Personalised recommendations