Skip to main content

Theorem Proving Languages for Verification

  • Conference paper
Automated Technology for Verification and Analysis (ATVA 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3299))

  • 350 Accesses

Abstract

Verification is a hard task, but much progress has been achieved recently. Many verification problems have been shown decidable by reducing them to model-checking finite state transition systems. Verification of infinite state transition systems has achieved tremendous progress too, by showing that many particular cases were themselves decidable, such as timed automata [1] or some forms of pushdown-automata [4]. However, the demand for verification is growing fast, and the industrial needs go far beyond the verification of decidable systems.

This work was partly supported by the RNTL project AVERROES.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alur, R., Dill, D.L.: A theory of timed automata. TCS 126(2), 183–235 (1994)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Blanqui, F.: Definitions by rewriting in the Calculus of Constructions. To appear in Mathematical Structures in Computer Science ( 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blanqui, F., Jouannaud, J.P., Strub, P.Y.: A calculus of congruent construction. Check web for updates (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bouajjani, A., Esparza, J., Maler, O.: Reachability analysis of pushdown automata: Application to model-checking. In: Mazurkiewicz, A., Winkowski, J. (eds.) CONCUR 1997. LNCS, vol. 1243, pp. 135–150. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chrzaszcz, J.: Modules in Coq Are and Will Be Correct. In: Berardi, S., Coppo, M., Damiani, F. (eds.) TYPES 2003. LNCS, vol. 3085, pp. 130–146. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jouannaud, JP. (2004). Theorem Proving Languages for Verification. In: Wang, F. (eds) Automated Technology for Verification and Analysis. ATVA 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3299. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30476-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30476-0_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23610-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30476-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics