Abstract
We complement the RDF semantics specification of the W3C by proving decidability of RDFS entailment. Furthermore, we show completeness and decidability of entailment for RDFS extended with datatypes and a property-related subset of OWL.
The RDF semantics specification provides a complete set of entailment rules for reasoning with RDFS, but does not prove decidability of RDFS entailment: the closure graphs used in the completeness proof are infinite for finite RDF graphs. We define partial closure graphs, which can be taken to be finite for finite RDF graphs, which can be computed in polynomial time, and which are sufficient to decide RDFS entailment.
We consider the extension of RDFS with datatypes and a property-related fragment of OWL: FunctionalProperty, InverseFunctionalProperty, sameAs, SymmetricProperty, TransitiveProperty, and inverseOf. In order to obtain a complete set of simple entailment rules, the semantics that we use for these extensions is in line with the ‘if-semantics’ of RDFS, and weaker than the ‘iff-semantics’ defining D-entailment and OWL (DL or Full) entailment. Classes can be used as instances, the use of FunctionalProperty and TransitiveProperty is not restricted to obtain decidability, and a partial closure that is sufficient for deciding entailment can be computed in polynomial time.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Grant, J., Beckett, D. (eds.): RDF Test Cases, W3C Recommendation, February 10 (2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-testcases-20040210/
Hayes, P. (ed.): RDF Semantics, W3C Recommendation, February 10 (2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-mt-20040210/
Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F.: Reducing OWL Entailment to Description Logic Satisfiability. In: Fensel, D., Sycara, K., Mylopoulos, J. (eds.) ISWC 2003. LNCS, vol. 2870, pp. 17–29. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Klyne, G., Carroll, J. (eds.): Resource Description Framework (RDF): Concepts and Abstract Syntax, W3C Recommendation, February 10 (2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-concepts-20040210/
Patel-Schneider, P.F., Hayes, P., Horrocks, I. (eds.): OWL Web Ontology Language Semantics and Abstract Syntax, W3C Recommendation, February 10 (2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-semantics-20040210/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
ter Horst, H.J. (2004). Extending the RDFS Entailment Lemma. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds) The Semantic Web – ISWC 2004. ISWC 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3298. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30475-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30475-3_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23798-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30475-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive