Abstract
As the use of Semantic Web ontologies continues to expand there is a growing need for tools that can validate ontological consistency and provide guidance in the correction of detected defects and errors. A number of tools already exist as evidenced by the ten systems participating in the W3C’s evaluation of the OWL Test Cases. For the most part, these first generation tools focus on experimental approaches to consistency checking, while minimal attention is paid to how the results will be used or how the systems might interoperate. For this reason very few of these systems produce results in a machine-readable format (for example as OWL annotations) and there is no shared notion across the tools of how to identify and describe what it is that makes a specific ontology or annotation inconsistent. In this paper we propose the development of a Symptom Ontology for the Semantic Web that would serve as a common language for identifying and describing semantic errors and warnings that may be indicative of inconsistencies in ontologies and annotations; we refer to such errors and warnings as symptoms. We offer the symptom ontology currently used by the ConsVISor consistency-checking tool, as the starting point for a discussion on the desirable characteristics of such an ontology. Included among these characteristics are 1) a hierarchy of common symptoms, 2) clear associations between specific symptoms and the axioms of the languages they violate and 3) a means for relating individual symptoms back to the specific constructs in the input file(s) through which they were implicated. We conclude with a number of suggestions for future directions of this work including its extension to syntactic symptoms.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
W3C Recommendation, OWL Web Ontology Language Overview (February 2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/
W3C, OWL Test Results Page (March 2004), http://www.w3.org/2003/08/owl-systems/test-results-out
European OntoWeb Consortium, A Survey of Ontology Tools (May 2002), http://ontoweb.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/About/Deliverables/D13_v1-0.zip
InfoEther & BBN Technologies, SemWebCentral Validation Tools Assessment, http://semwebcentral.org/assessment/report?type=category&category=Validation
Baclawski, K., Kokar, M., Waldinger, R., Kogut, P.: Consistency Checking of Semantic Web Ontologies. In: Horrocks, I., Hendler, J. (eds.) ISWC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2342, pp. 454–459. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Versatile Information Systems, Inc., ConsVISor, http://www.vistology.com/consvisor/
AGFA, Euler, http://www.agfa.com/w3c/euler/
UMBC, FOWL, http://fowl.sourceforge.net
University of Maryland Institute for Advanced Computer Studies, Pellet, http://www.mindswap.org/2003/pellet/
BBN, vOWLidator, http://owl.bbn.com/validator/
DAML, DARPA Agent Markup Language, http://www.daml.org/
W3C, OWL Test Cases (February 2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-test/
W3C Recommendation, OWL Web Ontology Language Semantics and Abstract Syntax (February 2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/
W3C Recommendation, OWL Web Ontology Language Overview (February 2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/
Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The Semantic Web: A new form of Web content that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities. Scientific American (May 2001)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Baclawski, K., Matheus, C.J., Kokar, M.M., Letkowski, J., Kogut, P.A. (2004). Towards a Symptom Ontology for Semantic Web Applications. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds) The Semantic Web – ISWC 2004. ISWC 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3298. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30475-3_45
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30475-3_45
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23798-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30475-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive