Skip to main content

The Role of Foundational Ontologies in Manufacturing Domain Applications

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3290))

Abstract

Although ontology has gained wide attention in the area of information systems, a criticism typical of the early days is still rehearsed here and there. Roughly, this criticism says: general ontologies are not suited for real applications. We believe this is the result of a misunderstanding of the role of general ontologies since, we claim, even foundational ontologies (the most general and formal ontologies) have a crucial role in building reusable, adaptable and transparent application systems. We support this view by showing how foundational ontologies can be used in the manufacturing control area. Our approach (partially presented here through an example) provides a domain-specific ontology which is explicitly designed for applications, theoretically organized by a foundational ontology, driven by the application field for all intents and purposes, suitable for communication across different applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Guarino, N.: Formal Ontology and Information Systems, FOIS, Trento, Italy, pp. 3–5 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fellbaum, C. (ed.): WordNet An Electronic Lexical Database. Bradford Book (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Masolo, C., Borgo, S., Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Oltramari, A.: Ontology Library (WonderWeb Deliverable D18), http://wonderweb.semanticweb.org/deliverables/documents/D18.pdf

  4. Pisanelli, D.M., Gangemi, A., Steve, G.: Ontologies and Information Systems: the Marriage of the Century? In: Proceedings of Lyee Workshop, Paris (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bertolazzi, P., Krusich, C., Missikoff, M.: An Approach to the Definition of a Core Enterprise Ontology: CEO, OES-SEO 2001, Rome (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wilks, Y.: Ontotherapy: or how to stop worrying about what there is 2003/8/6 (2003), http://www.racai.ro/EUROLAN-2003/html/presentations/SheffieldWilksBrewsterDingli/Ontotherapy_YWilks.ppt

  7. Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Masolo, C., Oltramari, A.: Understanding Top-Level Ontological Distinctions. In: Workshop on Ontologies and Information Sharing, IJCAI 2001 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Leitão, P., Restivo, F.: Holonic Adaptive Production Control Systems. In: Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, pp. 2968–2973 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Koestler, A.: The Ghost in the Machine. Arkana Books, London (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents (June 2003), http://www.fipa.org/

  11. Schlenoff, C., Knutilla, A., Ray, S.: Unified Process Specification Language: Requirements for Modelling Process, NIST, Interagency Report 5910, Gaithersburg MD (September 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Catron, B., Ray, S.: ALPS: A Language for Process Specification. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 4(2), 105–113 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fadel, F., Fox, M., Gruninger, M.: A Generic Enterprise Resource Ontology. In: 3rd IEEE Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructures for Collaborative Enterprises (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Uschold, M., King, M., Moralee, S., Zorgios, Y.: The Enterprise Ontology. The Knowledge Engineering Review, Special Issue on Putting Ontologies to Use 13(1), 31–89 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lee, J., Gruninger, M., Jin, Y., Malone, T., Tate, A., Yost, G.: The PIF WG, The PIF Process Interchange Format and Framework. Know. Eng. Rev. 13(1), 91–120 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. van der Vet, P., Speel, P.-H., Mars, N.: The PLINIUS Ontology of Ceramic Materials. In: ECAI 1994, Workshop on Comparison of Implemented Ontologies (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Heller, B., Herre, H.: Ontological Categories in GOL. Axiomathes 1(14), 57–76

    Google Scholar 

  18. Niles, I., Pease, A.: Toward a Standard Upper Ontology. In: FOIS 2001, pp. 2–9 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Martin, P.: Correction and Extension of WordNet 1.7. In: Ganter, B., de Moor, A., Lex, W. (eds.) ICCS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2746, pp. 160–173. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Masolo, C., Vieu, L., Bottazzi, E., Catenacci, C., Ferrario, R., Gangemi, A., Guarino, N.: Social Roles and their Descriptions, KR 2004, pp. 267–277 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Borgo, S., Leitão, P. (2004). The Role of Foundational Ontologies in Manufacturing Domain Applications. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2004: CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE. OTM 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3290. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30468-5_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30468-5_43

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23663-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30468-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics