Skip to main content

Formalizing User Actions for Ontologies

  • Conference paper
Geographic Information Science (GIScience 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3234))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We demonstrate an approach to the formalization of user actions in the human-computer interaction literature [18]. for the purpose of producing task-oriented ontologies. Verbs and nouns are extracted from a document that depicts user actions during a surface water monitoring process. The conceptual structure of the user actions is formalized through a combination of Formal Concept Analysis and Entailment theory. The subconcept-superconcept relations between user actions in a concept lattice are refined through the entailments of troponymy, proper inclusion, and backward presupposition. The approach is intended to strengthen the consideration of user tasks in ontology engineering for geographic information applications. We aim to enhance the context specification in semantic similarity assessments with action lattices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ACTOR: Research Workshop. Action-oriented Approaches in Geographic Information Science (2002), http://www.spatial.maine.edu/~actor2002/index.html

  2. Ballmer, T., Brennenstuhl, W.: Speech Act Classification. A Study in the Lexical Analysis of English Speech Activity Verbs. Springer, Berlin (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barwise, J., Seligman, J.: nformation Flow. The Logic of Distributed Systems. Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 44. Cambridge University Press, US (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bishr, Y.: Semantic Aspects of Interoperable GIS. ITC Publication No. 56, Enschede, Netherlands (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Câmara, G., de Carvalho, M.T.M., Fonseca, F., Casanova, M.A., Paiva, J., Gibotti, F.: From Workflows to Action-Driven Ontologies. Towards a Framework for Interoperability of Geographical Processes. In: Research Workshop. Action-Oriented Approaches in Geographic Information Science, Holden, ME (2002), http://www.spatial.maine.edu/~actor2002/participants/camara.pdf

  6. Chandrasekaran, B., Josephson, J.R., Benjamins, V.R.: Ontology of Tasks and Methods. In: Knowledge Acquisition Workshop, Banff, Canada (1998), http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/~chandra/Ontology-of-Tasks-Methods.pdf

  7. Chandrasekaran, B., Johnson, T., Smith, J.W.: Task Structure Analysis for Knowledge Modeling. Communications of the ACM 33, 124–136 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cimiano, P., Hotho, A., Stumme, G., Tane, J.: Conceptual Knowledge Processing with Formal Concept Analysis and Ontologies. In: Eklund, P. (ed.) ICFCA 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2961, pp. 189–207. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Fellbaum, C.: English Verbs as a Semantic Net. International Journal of Lexicography 3, 270–301 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fellbaum, C.: On the Semantics of Troponymy. In: Green, R., Bean, C.A., Myaeng, S.H. (eds.) The Semantics of Relationships. An Interdisciplinary Perspective, pp. 23–34. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ganter, B., Wille, R.: Formal Concept Analysis. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Gibson, J.J.: The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gomez-Perez, A., Fernandez-Lopez, M., Corcho, O.: Ontological Engineering. With Examples from the Areas of Knowledge Management, E-Commerce and the Semantic Web. Springer, London (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gruber, T.R.: Towards Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing. In: Guarino, N., Poli, R. (eds.) Formal Ontology in Conceptual Analysis and Knowledge Representation, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Guarino, N.: Semantic Matching. Formal Ontological Distinctions for Information Organization, Extraction and Integration (1997), http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/guarino97semantic.html

  16. Hernández, C., Prieto, F., Laguna, M.A., Crespo, Y.: Formal Concept Analysis Support for Conceptual Abstraction in Database Reengineering. In: Piattini, M., Calero, C. (eds.) Proceedings of Database Maintenance and Reengineering Workshop (DBMR 2002), Montreal, Canada (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jordan, T., Raubal, M., Gartrell, B., Egenhofer, M.: An Affordance-Based Model of Place in GIS. In: Poiker, T.K and Chrisman, N. (eds.) 8th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, SDH 1998, Vancouver, Canada, pp. 98–109 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kaptelinin, V., Nardi, B., Macaulav, C.: The Activity Checklist. A Tool for Representing the “Space” of Context. Interactions 6(4), 27–39 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kavouras, M., Kokla, M.: A Method for the Formalization and Integration of Geographical Categorizations. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 16(5), 439–453 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kuhn, W.: Formalizing Spatial Affordances, Formal Models of Commonsense Worlds (Special Meeting, NCGIA Research Initiative 21). National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis (NCGIA), San Marcos, TX (1996), http://www.geog.buffalo.edu/ncgia/i21/papers/kuhn.html

  21. Kuhn, W.: Ontologies in Support of Activities in Geographical Space. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 15(7), 613–631 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Levin, B.: English Verbs Classes and Alternations. A Preliminary Investigation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mizoguchi, R., Sinitsa, K., Ikeda, M.: Task Ontology Design for Intelligent Educational/ Training Systems. In: Workshop on Architectures and Methods for Designing Cost- Effective and Reusable ITSs, Montreal (1996), http://www.ei.sanken.osaka-u.ac.jp/.index.html

  24. Pinto, H.S., Martins, J.P.: Ontologies. How Can They be Built? Journal of Knowledge and Information Systems 6(4), 441–464 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Priss, U.E.: The Formalization of WordNet by Method of Relational Concept Analysis. In: Fellbaum, C. (ed.) WordNet. An Electronic Lexical Database, pp. 179–196. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Raubal, M., Kuhn, W.: Ontology-Based Task Simulation. Spatial Cognition and Computation 4(1), 15–37 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rodríguez, M.A., Egenhofer, M.: Comparing Geospatial Entity Classes. An Asymmetric and Context-dependent Similarity Measure. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 18(3), 229–256 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ruether, C., Kuhn, W., Bishr, Y.: An Algebraic Description of a Common Ontology for ATKIS and GDF. In: Proceedings of 3rd AGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science, Helsinki/Espoo, Finland (2000), http://agile.isegi.unl.pt/Conference/Helsinki2000/Abstract/Agile2000_58.pdf

  29. Sanderson, M., Croft, B.: Deriving Concept Hierarchies from Text. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 206–213. ACM Press, New York (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Snelting, G., Tip, F.: Reengineering Class Hierarchies Using Concept Analysis. In: Osterweil, L.J., Scherlis, W.L. (eds.) Proceedings of the ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations Software Engineering, pp. 99–110. ACM Press, New York (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Ullman, J.D.: Principles of Database Systems, 2nd edn. Computer Science Press, Rockwell (1982)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Water Framework Directive, WFD: Official Journal of the European Communities (2000), http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/pri/en/oj/dat/2000/l_327/l_32720001222en00010072.pdf

  33. Water Framework Directive, WFD: Guidance Document on Implementing the GIS Elements of the WFD. Water Framework Directive Common Implementation Strategy. European Communities (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Welty, C., Guarino, N.: Supporting Ontological Analysis of Taxonomic Relationships. Data and Knowledge Engineering 39(1), 51–74 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Soon, K., Kuhn, W. (2004). Formalizing User Actions for Ontologies. In: Egenhofer, M.J., Freksa, C., Miller, H.J. (eds) Geographic Information Science. GIScience 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3234. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30231-5_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30231-5_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23558-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30231-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics