Advertisement

Automatic Service Matching and Service Discovery Based on Ontology

  • Chuan Lin
  • Zhaohui Wu
  • Shuiguang Deng
  • Li Kuang
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3252)

Abstract

With the development of standards and technologies related to services, more and more services are becoming available on the Internet. To find a target service from tremendous ones, which provides the wanted functions, has become more and more difficult. Thus automatic service matching and service discovery become important. In order to realize the automatic service matching and service discovery, ontology is the key solution. In this paper, we use ontology to describe services and use ontology to compute the similarity between two concepts. Based on the computation of ontology, we propose algorithms to search target services based on ontology information embedded in them. Our algorithm cares about not only the relationship between ontology classes, but also the relationship between classes and properties. Thus it provides more accuracy than other related methods.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Feisi Science and Technique Center of Research and Development. Application and Development of Java Web Service. Beijing Publishing House of Electronics Industry, pp. 190–196 (2002) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Medjahed, B., Bouguettaya, A., Elmagarmid, A.K.: Composing Web services on the Semantic Web. The VLDB Journal (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chandra solraran, B., Josephson, J.R.: What Are Ontologies, and Why Do we Need Them? IEEE Intelligent systems (January/February 1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Horrocks, I.: DAML+OIL: a description logic for the Semantic Web. IEEE Data Eng. Bull 25(1), 4–9 (2002)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wu, Z.H., Chen, H.J.: DartGrid: Semantic-based Database Grid. Accepted to International Conference on Computational Science (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deng, S.G., Yu, Z., Wu, Z.H.: Enhancement of Workflow Flexibility by Composing Activities at Runtime. In: Proc. Of the Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deng, S., Wu, Z., Li, C.: A Framework for Managing Serviceflow in a Dynamic Flexible Way. Submitted to WISE 2004 (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Klein, M., Bernstein, A.: Searching for services on the semantic Web using process ontologies. In: Isabel, C. (ed.) Proc. of the Int’l Semantic Web Working Symp (SWWS 2001), pp. 159–172. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Richard, G.G.: Service advertisement and discovery: enabling universal device cooperation. IEEE Internet Computing 4(5), 18–26 (2000)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    ESPEAK, Hewlett Packard’s Service Framework Specification, HP Inc. (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kuokka, D.R., Harada, L.T.: Issues and extensions for information matchmaking protocols. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems 5, 2–3 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Paolucci, M., Kawamura, L., Payne, T.R., Sycara, K.: Semantic Matching of Web Services CapabilitiesGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    DAML Joint Committee. Daml+oil (March 2001) language, http://www.daml.org/2001/03/daml+oil-index.html
  14. 14.
    METEOR–S WSDI: A Scalable P2P Infrastructure of Registries for Semantic Publication and Discovery of Web ServicesGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chuan Lin
    • 1
    • 2
  • Zhaohui Wu
    • 2
  • Shuiguang Deng
    • 2
  • Li Kuang
    • 2
  1. 1.Wenzhou Normal CollegeWenzhouPRC
  2. 2.College of Computer ScienceZhejiang UniversityHangzhouPRC

Personalised recommendations