Skip to main content

Invented Predicates to Reduce Knowledge Acquisition

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3257))

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop machine-learning techniques that would speed up knowledge acquisition from an expert. As the expert provided knowledge the system would generalize from this knowledge in order to reduce the need for later knowledge acquisition. This generalization should be completely hidden from the expert. We have developed such a learning technique based on Duce’s intra-construction and absorption operators [1] and applied to Ripple-Down Rule (RDR) incremental knowledge acquisition [2]. Preliminary evaluation shows that knowledge acquisition can be reduced by up to 50%.

This is a modified version of paper presented at the IJCAI 2003 Workshop on Mixed-Initiative Intelligent Systems

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Muggleton, S.D.: An oracle-based approach to constructive induction. In: Proceeding of the Tenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 287–292 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Compton, P., Jansen, R.: A philosophical basis for knowledge acquisition. Knowledge Acquisition 2, 241–257 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Edwards, G., et al.: PEIRS: a pathologist maintained expert system for the interpretation of chemical pathology reports. Pathology 25, 27–34 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kang, B., Compton, P., Preston, P.: Multiple classification ripple down rules: Evaluation and possibilities. In: 9th AAAI-sponsored Banff Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge Based Systems Workshop, pp. 17.1–17.20 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shiraz, G., Sammut, C.: Combining knowledge acquisition and machine learning to control dynamic systems. In: 15th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Nagoya Japan, pp. 908–913. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Beydoun, G., Hoffmann, A.: Acquisition of Search Knowledge. In: the 10th European Knowledge Acquisition Workshop, pp. 1–16 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Beydoun, G., Hoffmann, A.: Building Problem Solvers Based on Search Control Knowledge. In: 11th Banff Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge Base System Workshop, pp. Share1-1-Share1-16. SRDG publications, Calgary (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kang, B., et al.: A help desk system with intelligent interface. Applied Artificial Intelligence 11(7-8), 611–631 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Compton, P., Ramadan, Z., Preston, P., Le-Gia, T., Chellen, V., Mullholland, M.: A trade-off between domain knowledge and problem solving method power. In: 11th Banff knowledge acquisition for knowledge-bases systems workshop, Banff, SHARE 17, pp. 1-19. SRDG Publications, University of Calgary (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Richards, D., Compton, P.: SISYPHUS I Revisited: An Incremental Approach to Resource Allocation using Ripple Down Rules. In: 12th Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management, Banff, 16th-21st October, SRDG Publications, Canada (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Drake, B., Beydoun, G.: Predicate logic-based incremental knowledge acquisition. In: Compton, P., Hoffmann, A., Motoda, H., Yamaguchi, T. (eds.) Proceedings of the sixth Pacific International Knowledge Acquisition Workshop, Sydney, pp. 71–88 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Compton, P., Preston, P., Yip, T.: Local patching produces compact knowledge bases. In: The European Knowledge Acquisition Workshop, pp. 104–117. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kang, B., Compton, P., Preston, P.: Simulated Expert Evaluation of Multiple Classification Ripple Down Rules. In: 11th Banff knowledge acqusition for knowledge-based systems workshop, Banff, EVAL 4, pp. 1–19. SRDG Publications, University of Calgary (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Suryanto, H., Richards, D., Compton, P.: The automatic compression of Multiple Classification Ripple Down Rule Knowledged Based Systems: Preliminary Experiments. In: Knowledge-based Intelligence Information Engineering Systems, Adelaide, South Australia, pp. 203–206. IEEE, Los Alamitos (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Catlett, J.: Ripple Down Rules as a Mediating Representation in Interactive Induction. In: Proceedings of the Second Japanese Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge Based Systems Workshop, Kobe, Japan, pp. 155–170 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gaines, B.R., Compton, P.J.: Induction of Ripple Down Rules. In: Fifth Australian Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Hobart (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kivinen, J., Mannila, H., Ukkonen, E.: Learning Rules with Local Exceptions. In: European Conference on Computational Theory, pp. 35–46. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Scheffer, T.: Learning Rules with Nested Exceptions. In: International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Siromoney, A., Siromoney, R.: Variations and Local Exception in Inductive Logic Programming. In: Furukawa, K., Michie, D., Muggleton, S. (eds.) Machine Intelligence - Applied Machine Intelligence, pp. 213–234 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wada, T., et al.: Integrating Inductive Learning and Knowledge Acquisition in the Ripple Down Rules Method. In: Proceeding of the 6th Pacific Knowledge Acquisition Workshop, Sydney, Australia, pp. 325–341 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Clancey, W.J.: Heuristic classification. Artificial Intelligence 27, 289–350 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Compton, P., et al.: Maintaining an expert system. In: Quinlan, J.R. (ed.) Applications of Expert Systems, pp. 366–385. Addison Wesley, Reading (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Beydoun, G., Hoffmann, A.: Incremental Acquisition of Search Knowledge. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 52(3), 493–530 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Compton, P., Richards, D.: Generalising Ripple-Down Rules. In: Dieng, R., Corby, O. (eds.) Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management: Methods, Models, Tools, Juan-les-Pins France, 2-6 October, pp. 380–386. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Matheus, C.J., Rendell, L.A.: Constructive induction on decision trees. In: Proceed-ings of the Eleventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence Detroit, pp. 645–650. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bloedorn, E., Michalski, R.S.: Data Driven Constructive Induction in AQ17-PRE: A Method and Experiments. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Tools for Artificiall Intelligence, San Jose, CA, November 9-14 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zupan, B., et al.: Machine Learning by Function Decompo-sition. In: Proceedings of the 14 th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 421–429 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sutton, R.S., Matheus, C.J.: Learning polynomial functions by feature construction. In: Machine Learning: Proceedings of the Eighth Interna-tional Workshop, Evanston, IL, pp. 208–212. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Srinivasan, A., King, R.D.: Feature construction with inductive logic program-ming: A study of quantitative predictions of biological activity aided by structural attributes. In: Inductive Logic Programming: Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop, pp. 89–104. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Flach, P.A., Lavrac, N.: The role of feature construction in inductive rule learning. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning 2000 workshop on Attribute- Value and Relational Learning: crossing the boundaries, USA, pp. 1–11. Luc De Raedt and Stefan Kramer, Stan-ford (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Compton, P., Preston, P., Kang, B.: The Use of Simulated Experts in Evaluating Knowledge Acquisition. In: 9th AAAI-sponsored Banff Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge Base System Workshop, p. 12.1-12.18 University of Calgary, Canada (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kang, B.: Validating Knowledge Acquisition: Multiple Classification Ripple Down Rules. In: School of Computer Science and Engineering, New South Wales University, Sydney (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tecuci, G., Kodratoff, Y.: Machine Learning and Knowledge Acquisition: Integrated Approaches. Academic Press, London (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Suryanto, H., Compton, P. (2004). Invented Predicates to Reduce Knowledge Acquisition. In: Motta, E., Shadbolt, N.R., Stutt, A., Gibbins, N. (eds) Engineering Knowledge in the Age of the Semantic Web. EKAW 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3257. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30202-5_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30202-5_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23340-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30202-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics