Skip to main content

Generating and Integrating Evidence for Ontology Mappings

  • Conference paper
Engineering Knowledge in the Age of the Semantic Web (EKAW 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3257))

Abstract

For more than a decade, ontologies have been proposed as a means to enable sharing and reuse of knowledge. While originally relatively narrow information landscapes have been in mind (e.g., knowledge sharing between a few expert systems) the application areas proposed nowadays (e.g., organizational knowledge management or the SemanticWeb) are rather broad and open.

From abstract considerations about the distributed nature of knowledge as well as from observation of actual (human) ontology negotiation processes it seems clear that globally agreed-upon conceptualizations are probably not obtainable. Therefore, ontology matching and mapping procedures play an essential role in more open information landscapes.

In this paper, we present a framework that collects and integrates heuristic evidence for ontology mappings, allows a knowledge engineer to browse a space of (assessed) mapping candidates in order to select adequate candidates and then leverage them to a level of formal statements for ontology merging. A simple example session shows the intended handling of the prototype and demonstrates strengths and weaknesses of particular sources of matching evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abecker, A., van Elst, L.: Ontologies for knowledge management. In: [22], pp. 435–454. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baeza-Yates, R., Ribeiro-Neto, B.: Modern Information Retrieval. AddisonWesley, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bergmann, R., Richter, M.M., Schmitt, S., Stahl, A., Vollrath, I.: Utility-oriented matching: A new research direction for case-based reasoning. In: Schmitt, S., Vollrath, I., Reimer, U. (eds.) Proceedings of the 9th German Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Do, H.H., Rahm, E.: COMA —A system for flexible combination of schema matching approaches. In: Bernstein, P.A., et al. (eds.) VLDP 2002: proceedings of the Twenty- Eighth International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, Hong Kong SAR, China, August 20–23 (2002), pp. 610–621. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. van Elst, L., Abecker, A.: Negotiating domain ontologies in distributed organizational memories. In: Bouquet, P. (ed.) Meaning Negotiation (MeaN 2002), pp. 32–35. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2002); Technical Report WS-02-09

    Google Scholar 

  6. van Elst, L., Abecker, A.: Ontologies for information management: Balancing formality, stability, and sharing scope. Expert Systems with Applications 23(4), 357–366 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. van Elst, L., Dignum, V., Abecker, A. (eds.): AMKM 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2926, pp. 405–415. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. van Elst, L., Dignum, V., Abecker, A.: Towards agent-mediated knowledge management. In: [7], pp. 1–31 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Euzenat, J., Valtchev, P.: An integrative proximity measure for ontology alignment. In: Doan, A., Halevy, A., Noy, N. (eds.) Proceedings of the 1st Intl. Workshop on Semantic Integration. CEUR, vol. 82 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fensel, D.: Ontologies: A Silver Bullet for Knowledge Management and Electronic Commerce. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Ho, T.K.: A Theory of Multiple Classifier Systems And Its Application to Visual Word Recognition. PhD thesis, State University of NewYork, Buffalo (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kohlhas, J., Monney, P.A.: References theory of evidence – a survey of its mathematical foundations, applications and foundational aspects. ZOR – Mathematical Methods of Operations Research 39, 35–68 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lacher, M.S., Groh, G.: Faciliating the exchange of explicit knowedge through ontology mappings. In: Russell, I., Kolen, J. (eds.) Fourteenth International FLAIRS conference, pp. 305–309 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. McGuinness, D.L., Fikes, R., Rice, J., Wilder, S.: The chimaera ontology environment. In: Proc. of the 17th National Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2000), Austin, Texas (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. McGuinness, D.L., Fikes, R., Rice, J., Wilder, S.: An environment for merging and testing large ontologies. In: Proc. of the Seventh Int. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2000), Breckenridge, Colorado, USA (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Melnik, S., Garcia-Molina, H., Rahm, E.: Similarity Flooding: AVersatile Graph Matching Algorithm and ist Application to Schema Matching. In: Proceedings 18th ICDE, San Jose, CA (February 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Neches, R., Fikes, R., Finin, T., Gruber, Th., Patil, R., Senator, T., Swartout, W.R.: Enabling technology for knowledge sharing. AI Magazine 12(3), 36–56 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fridman Noy, N., Musen, M.: PROMPT: Algorithm and tool for automated ontology merging and alignment. In: Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2000) and of the 12th Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI 2000), July 30– 3 (2000), pp. 450–455. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Prasad, S., Peng, Y., Finin, T.: A tool for mapping between two ontologies using explicit information. In: Bouquet, P. (ed.) Meaning Negotiation – Papers from the AAAIWorkshop. AAAI, Menlo Park (2002); Technical Report WS-02-09

    Google Scholar 

  20. Salton, G.: Automatic information organization and retrieval. McGraw Hill, NewYork (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schaaf, M., van Elst, L.: An approach to cooperating organizational memories based on semantic negotiation and unification. In: AAAI 2002 Workshop on Meaning Negotiation, pp. 13–16. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2002); Technical Report WS-02-09

    Google Scholar 

  22. Staab, S., Studer, R.: Handbook on Ontologies. In: International Handbooks on Information Systems. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wache, H.: Semantische Mediation für heterogene Informationsquellen. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft Aka GmbH, Berlin (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

van Elst, L., Kiesel, M. (2004). Generating and Integrating Evidence for Ontology Mappings. In: Motta, E., Shadbolt, N.R., Stutt, A., Gibbins, N. (eds) Engineering Knowledge in the Age of the Semantic Web. EKAW 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3257. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30202-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30202-5_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23340-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30202-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics