Skip to main content

Statistical Regimes Across Constrainedness Regions

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3258))

Abstract

Much progress has been made in terms of boosting the effectiveness of backtrack style search methods. In addition, during the last decade, a much better understanding of problem hardness, typical case complexity, and backtrack search behavior has been obtained. One example of a recent insight into backtrack search concerns so-called heavy-tailed behavior in randomized versions of backtrack search. Such heavy-tails explain the large variations in runtime often observed in practice. However, heavy-tailed behavior does certainly not occur on all instances. This has led to a need for a more precise characterization of when heavy-tailedness does and when it does not occur in backtrack search. In this paper, we provide such a characterization. We identify different statistical regimes of the tail of the runtime distributions of randomized backtrack search methods and show how they are correlated with the “sophistication” of the search procedure combined with the inherent hardness of the instances. We also show that the runtime distribution regime is highly correlated with the distribution of the depth of inconsistent subtrees discovered during the search. In particular, we show that an exponential distribution of the depth of inconsistent subtrees combined with a search space that grows exponentially with the depth of the inconsistent subtrees implies heavy-tailed behavior.

This work was supported in part by the Intelligent Information Systems Institute, Cornell University (AFOSR grant F49620-01-1-0076).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hogg, T., Huberman, B., Williams, C.: Phase Transitions and Search Problems. Artificial Intelligence 81 (1-2), 1–15 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Gent, I., Walsh, T.: Easy Problems are Sometimes Hard. Artificial Intelligence 70, 335–345 (1994)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Hogg, T., Williams, C.: The Hardest Constraint Problems: a Double Phase Transition. Artificial Intelligence 69, 359–377 (1994)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith, B., Grant, S.: Sparse Constraint Graphs and Exceptionally Hard Problems. In: Proceedings IJCAI 1995, Montréal, Canada, pp. 646–651 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Selman, B., Kirkpatrick, S.: Finite-Size Scaling of the Computational Cost of Systematic Search. Artificial Intelligence 81, 273–295 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith, B., Grant, S.: Modelling Exceptionally Hard Constraint Satisfaction Problems. In: Proceedings CP 1997, Linz, Austria, pp. 182–195 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Frost, D., Rish, I., Vila, L.: Summarizing CSP Hardness with Continuous Probability Distributions. In: AAAI 1997, Providence RI, pp. 327–333 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gomes, C., Selman, B., Crato, N.: Heavy-tailed Distributions in Combinatorial Search. In: Proceedings CP 1997, Linz, Austria, pp. 121–135 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hoos, H.: PhD Thesis,TU Darmstadt (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dechter, R.: Constraint Processing. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chen, H., Gomes, C., Selman, B.: Formal Models of Heavy-tailed Behavior in Combinatorial Search. In: Walsh, T. (ed.) CP 2001. LNCS, vol. 2239, pp. 408–421. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Williams, R., Gomes, C., Selman, B.: Backdoors to Typical Case Complexity (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Walsh, T.: SAT vs CSP. In: Dechter, R. (ed.) CP 2000. LNCS, vol. 1894, pp. 441–456. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Achlioptas, D., Kirousis, L., Kranakis, E., Krizanc, D., Molloy, M., Stamatiou, Y.: Random Constraint Satisfaction: a More Accurate Picture. In: Smolka, G. (ed.) CP 1997. LNCS, vol. 1330, pp. 107–120. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu, K., Li, W.: Exact Phase Transition in Random Constraint Satisfaction Problems. JAIR 12, 93–103 (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Bessière, C., Zanuttini, B., Fernández, C.: Measuring Search Trees. In: Hnich, B. (ed.) Proceedings ECAI 2004 Workshop on Modelling and Solving Problems with Constraints, Valencia, Spain (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Li, C.: Ambulagan: Heuristics Based on Unit Propagation for Satisfiability Problems. In: Proceedings IJCAI 1997, Nagoya, Japan, pp. 366–371 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gomes, C.P., Fernández, C., Selman, B., Bessiere, C. (2004). Statistical Regimes Across Constrainedness Regions. In: Wallace, M. (eds) Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming – CP 2004. CP 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3258. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30201-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30201-8_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23241-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30201-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics