Skip to main content

Implicit Versus Explicit Learning of Strategies in a Non-procedural Cognitive Skill

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3220))

Abstract

University physics is typical of many cognitive skills in that there is no standard procedure for solving problems, and yet a few students still master the skill. This suggests that their learning of problem solving strategies is implicit, and that an effective tutoring system need not teach problem solving strategies as explicitly as model-tracing tutors do. In order to compare implicit vs. explicit learning of problem solving strategies, we developed two physics tutoring systems, Andes and Pyrenees. Pyrenees is a model-tracing tutor that teaches a problem solving strategy explicitly, whereas Andes uses a novel pedagogy, developed over many years of use in the field, that provides virtually no explicit strategic instruction. Preliminary results from an experiment comparing the two systems are reported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berry, E.C., Broadbent, D.E.: On the relationship between task performance and associated verbalizable knowledge. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 36A, 209–231 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burton, R.R., Brown, J.S.: An investigation of computer coaching for informal learning activities. In: Sleeman, D., Brown, J.S. (eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Academic Press, New York (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Corbett, A.T., Bhatnagar, A.: Student modeling in the ACT programming tutor: Adjusting a procedural learning model with declarative knowledge. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on User Modeling. (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Graesser, A.C., VanLehn, K., Rose, C.P., Jordan, P.W., Harter, D.: Intelligent tutoring systems with conversational dialogue. AI Magazine 22(4), 39–51 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lesgold, A., Lajoie, S., Bunzo, M., Eggan, G.: Sherlock: A coached practice environment for an electronics troubleshooting job. In: Larkin, J.H.a.C. (ed.) Computer Assisted Instruction and Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Shared Goals and Complementary Approaches, pp. 201–238. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mitrovic, A., Ohlsson, S.: Evaluation of a constraint-based tutor for a database language. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Education 10, 238–256 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Reiser, B.J., Kimberg, D.Y., Lovett, M.C., Ranney, M.: Knowledge representation and explanation in GIL, an intelligent tutor for programming. In: Larkin, J.H., Chabay, R.W. (eds.) Computer Assisted Instruction and Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Shared Goals and Complementary Approaches, pp. 111–150. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Scheines, R., Sieg, W.: Computer environments for proof construction. Interactive Learning Environments 4(2), 159–169 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. VanLehn, K., Jones, R.M.: Learning by explaining examples to oneself: A computational model. In: Chipman, S., Meyrowitz, A. (eds.) Cognitive Models of Complex Learning, pp. 25–82. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  10. VanLehn, K., Jones, R.M., Chi, M.T.H.: A model of the self-explanation effect. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 2(1), 1–59 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. VanLehn, K., Lynch, C., Taylor, L., Weinstein, A., Shelby, R., Schulze, k., Treacy, D., Wintersgill, M.: Minimally invasive tutoring of complex physics problem solving. In: Cerri, S.A., Gouarderes, G., Paraguacu, F. (eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems 1001: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference, pp. 158–167. Springer, Berlin (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

VanLehn, K. et al. (2004). Implicit Versus Explicit Learning of Strategies in a Non-procedural Cognitive Skill. In: Lester, J.C., Vicari, R.M., Paraguaçu, F. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3220. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30139-4_49

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30139-4_49

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22948-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30139-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics