On the Convergence of Knowledge Management and Groupware

  • Sajda Qureshi
  • Vlatka Hlupic
  • Robert O. Briggs
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3198)


As successful organizations recognize that they need to convert their intellectual resources into customized services, the value of electronic collaboration has increased. Current efforts in managing knowledge have concentrated on producing; sharing and storing knowledge while business problems require the combined use of these intellectual resources to enable organizations to provide innovative and customized services. This paper argues that knowledge management and collaboration have common, mutually interdependent purposes and practices. It develops a framework that demonstrates this interdependence, mapping collaboration technologies to knowledge management activities. It concludes with a call for the convergence of these two streams for the benefit of researchers, practitioners, and organizations.


Knowledge Management Intellectual Capital Group Support System Collaboration Technology Intellectual Resource 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Angus, J., Patel, J.: Knowledge Management Cosmology. InformationWeek,March 16, 59 (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Borghoff, U.M., Pareschi, R. (eds.): Information Technology for Knowledge Management. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Briggs, R.O.: Focus Theory of Group Productivity, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Arizona (1994)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Briggs, R.O., de Vreede, G.J., Nunamaker Jr., J.F.: Collaboration Engineering with ThinkLets to Pursue Sustained Success with Group Support Systems. Journal of Management Information Systems 19(4), 31–63 (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ellis, C.A., Gibbs, S.J., Rein, G.L.: Groupware: Some Issues and Experiences. Communications of the ACM, 39–58 (1991)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ferran-Urdaneta, C.: Teams or Communities? Organizational Structures for Knowledge Management. In: Proceedings of the 1999 ACM SIGCPR conference on computer Personnel Research, pp. 128–134 (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gamble, P.R., Blackwell, J.: Knowledge Management: A state of the art guide. Kogan Page (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grudin, J., Palen, L.: Why Groupware Succeeds: Discretion or Mandate? In: Proceedings of ECSCW 1995, pp. 263–278. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1995)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gupta, A.K., Govindarajan, V.: Knowledge Management’s Social Dimension: Lessons From Nucor Steel. Sloan Management Review, 71–80 (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hansen, M.T., von Oetinger, B.: Introducing T-shaped Managers: Knowledge Management’s Next Generation. Harvard Business Review, 107–116 (March 2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hibbard, J., Carillo, K.M.: Knowledge Revolution – Getting employees to share what they know is no longer a technology challenge – it’s a corporate culture challenge. InformationWeek, 663 (1998)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jackson, C.: Process to Product: Creating Tools for Knowledge Management (1999), [www document]
  13. 13.
    Kramer, M.: Knowledge Management Becomes Catch Phrase but Eludes Easy Definition. PC Week, 95 (December 1998)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Macintosh, A.: Knowledge Management (1999), [www document]
  15. 15.
    Nunamaker, J., Briggs, R., Mittleman, D., Vogel, D., Balthazard, P.: Lessons from a Dozen Years of Group Support Systems Research: A Discussion of Lab and Field Findings. Journal of Management Information Systems 13(3), 163–207 (Winter 1996-1997)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nunamaker Jr., J.F., Briggs, R.O., de Vreede, G.J.: From Information Technology To Value Creation Technology. In: Dickson, G.W., DeSanctis, G. (eds.) Information Technology and the Future Enterprise: New Models for Managers, Prentice-Hall, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Quinn, J.B.: Intelligent Enterprise. Free Press. New York (1992)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Qureshi, S., van der Vaart, A., Kaulingfreeks, G., Vreede, G.J., de Briggs, R.O., Nunamaker, J.: What does it mean for an Organisation to be Intelligent? Measuring Intellectual Bandwidth for Value Creation. In: The Thirty Fifth Hawaii International Conference in Systems Sciences, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2002)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ruggles, R.: Knowledge Tools: Using Technology to Manage Knowledge Better (1997),
  20. 20.
    Skyrme, D.J.: Knowledge Networking: Creating the collaborative enterprise. Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford (2000)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sproull, L., Kiesler, S.: Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. The MIT Press. Cambridge (1991)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stewart, T.A.: Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organisations, Nicholas Brealey Publishing Limited, London (1997)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sveiby, K.E.: The New Organizational Wealth: Managing and Measuring Knowledgebased Assets. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco (1997)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vance, D.M.: Information, Knowledge and Wisdom: The Epistemic Hierarchy and Computer- Based Information System. In: Proceedings of the 1997 America’s Conference on Information Systems (1997),
  25. 25.
    Whitaker, R.: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) and Groupware: Overview, Definitions, and Distinctions (1996),
  26. 26.
    Zack, M.: Developing a knowledge strategy. California Management Review, 125–145 (1999)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zigurs, I., Kozar, K.A.: An Exploratory Study of Roles in Computer-Supported Groups. MIS Quarterly, 277–294 (1994)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sajda Qureshi
    • 1
  • Vlatka Hlupic
    • 2
  • Robert O. Briggs
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Information Systems and Quantitative Analysis, College of Information Systems & TechnologyUniversity of Nebraska Omaha, The Peter Kiewit InstituteOmahaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Information Systems and ComputingBrunel UniversityUxbridge, MiddlesexUK
  3. 3.Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands, CMIUniversity of ArizonaUSA

Personalised recommendations