Bridging the Gap Between Decisions and Their Implementations

  • Marcos R. S. Borges
  • José A. Pino
  • Renata M. Araujo
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3198)


Decisions are frequently sent to implementers without much detail. It should not be a surprise, then, that results are not as expected. The lack of accompanying information and a common context produces wrongly implemented or lost decisions. This paper proposes a solution to this problem based on computer technology. In particular, a combination of tools including shared workspaces, process modeling with workflow and a discussion tool, is proposed. A case is used to illustrate the problem and its solution.


Implementation Plan Contextual Knowledge Group Support System Decision Implementation Common Context 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Oppenheim, L.: Making meetings matter: A report to the 3M Corporation. 3M Meeting Management Institute, Austin, TX, USA (1987)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bostrom, R., Anson, R., Clawson, V.: Group Facilitation and Group Support Systems. In: Jessup, L., Valacich, J. (eds.) Group Support Systems – New Perspectives, pp. 146–168. Macmillan Pub. Co, New York (1993)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Borges, M.R.S., Pino, J.A., Fuller, D., Salgado, A.C.: Key issues in the design of an asynchronous system to support meeting preparation. Decision Support Systems 27(3), 271–289 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nunamaker, J., Dennis, A., George, J., Valacich, J., Vogel, D.: Electronic meeting systems to support group work. Communications of the ACM 34(7), 40–61 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Romano, N., Nunamaker, J.: Meeting analysis: Findings from research and practice. In: Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science, Hawaii, USA (2001); CD-ROMGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Borges, M.R.S., Pino, J.A., Valle, C.: Support for Decision Implementation and Follow-up. European Journal of Operational Research (2004) (in press)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brezillon, P., Borges, M.R.S., Pino, J.A.: Context-Based Awareness in Group Work. In: Proc. of the International FLAIRS Conference, Miami Beach, FL (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brézillon, P., Pomerol, J.-C.: Contextual knowledge sharing and cooperation in intelligent assistant systems. Le Travail Humain 62(3), 223–246 (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brézillon, P.: Individual and team contexts in a design process. In: Sprague, R.H. (ed.) Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science, Los Alamitos, USA (2003);CD-ROMGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brézillon, P., Marquois, E.: Une approche centrée contexte de l’activité. In: Bastien, J.M.C. (ed.) Symposium “Tâche, Activité et Contexte” (TAC),Actes des Deuxièmes Journées d’Etude en Psychologie Ergonomique – EPIQUE, INRIA, France, pp. 263–268 (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brézillon, P.: Using context for Supporting Users Efficiently. In: Sprague, R.H. (ed.) Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, Emerging Technologies Track, Los Alamitos, USA (2003) ;CD-ROMGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pomerol, J.-C., Brézillon, P.: Dynamics between contextual knowledge and proceduralized context. In: CONTEXT 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1688, pp. 284–295. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Watson, R.T.: Data Management. Databases and Organizations, 2nd edn. John Wiley and Sons, Inc, New York Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gutwin, C., Roseman, M., Greenberg, S.: A Usability Study of Awareness Widgets in a Shared Workspace Groupware System. In: Proceedings of ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 258–267. ACM Press, New York (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mendes, C.D.L.: Post-meeting Support using Workflow Technology . M.Sc. Dissertation, Informatics Program, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (2003) (In Portuguese) Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kunz, W., Rittel, H.: Issues as Elements of Information Systems, Working paper #131, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, U. of California at Berkeley (1970)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Guerrero, L.A., Pino, J.A.: Preparing Decision Meetings at a Large Organization. In: Adam, F., Brézillon, P., Humphreysand, P., Pomerol, J.-C. (eds.) Proc. of the Decision Making and Decision Support in the Internet Age, Cork, Ireland, pp. 86–95 (2002)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Compendium Institute: Questmap ,Available at on 13 April 2004)
  19. 19.
    IBM Lotus Notes, Available at (accessed on 30 March 2003)
  20. 20.
    IBM Lotus Workflow: Available at on 30 March 2003)
  21. 21.
    Unknown author: Referee’s comments on the submitted version of this paperGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcos R. S. Borges
    • 1
  • José A. Pino
    • 2
  • Renata M. Araujo
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Post-Graduate Program in Informatics, NCE&IMUniversidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroRio de JaneiroBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceUniversidad de ChileSantiagoChile
  3. 3.School of Applied InformaticsUniversidade Federal do Estado do Rio de JaneiroRio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations