Abstract
The paper claims that processes for monitoring, assessing and ensuring appropriate levels of accessibility and usability have to be adopted by web development and maintenance teams. Secondarily it argues that automatic tools for accessibility and usability are a necessary component of these processes. The paper presents first an analysis of web development and maintenance activities that highlights the reasons why accessibility and usability are so poorly achieved. It then suggests which processes, borrowed from the domain of software quality assurance, should be established to improve production and maintenance of web sites. The paper finally shows how automatic tools could fit in those processes and actually improve them, while being cost-effective.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Basili, V., Weiss, D.: A methodology for collecting valid software engineering data. IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering 10(6), 728–738 (1984)
Black, R.: Managing the testing process. Wiley Publishing Inc, Chichester (2002)
Brajnik, G.: Automatic web usability evaluation: what needs to be done? In: Proc. Human Factors and the Web, 6th Conference, Austin TX (June 2000), www.dimi.uniud.it/giorgio/papers/hfweb00.html
Brajnik, G.: Comparing accessibility evaluation tools: a method for tool effectiveness. Universal Access in the Information Society (2004) (to appear)
Brink, T., Hofer, E.: Automatically evaluating web usability. CHI 2002 Workshop (April 2002)
Bugzilla.org. Bugzilla - bug tracking system (February 2004), www.bugzilla.org/about.html
Chi, E., Pirolli, P., Pitkow, J.: The scent of a site: a system for analyzing and predicting information scent, usage and usability of a web site. In: ACM, editor, Proceedings of CHI (2000)
Fenton, N., Lawrence Pfleeger, S.: Software metrics, 2nd edn. International Thompson Publishing Company (1997)
Goto, K., Cotler, E.: Web redesign: workflow that works. New Riders Publishing, Indianapolis (2002)
Hackos, J., Redish, J.: User and task analysis for interface design. Wiley Computer Publishing, Chichester (1998)
Holzschlag, M., Lawson, B. (eds.): Usability: the site speaks for itself. Glasshouse Ltd (2002)
Lynch, P., Horton, S.: Web Style Guide, 2nd edn. Yale University, London (2002)
Lang, T.: Comparing website accessibility evaluation methods and learnings from usability evaluation methods. Peak Usability (2003), www.peakusability.com.au/articles
Mayhew, D.: The Usability Engineering Lifecycle: A Practitioner’s Handbook for User Interface Design. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1999)
McCarthy, J.: Dynamics of software development. Microsoft Press, Redmond (1995)
National Cancer Institute. Usability.gov.(2002), www.usability.gov
National Center for Accessible Media. STEP508 (2003), www.section508.gov/step
Nielsen, J.: Usability engineering. Academic Press, London (1993)
Nielsen, J.: Designing Web Usability: the practice of simplicity. New Riders Publishing, Indianapolis (1999)
Nielsen, N.: Alertbox (2004), www.useit.com/alertbox/
Nielsen, J., Tahir, M.: Homepage usability: 50 websites deconstructed. New Riders, Indianapolis (2001)
Nielsen Norman Group. Beyond ALT Text: Making the Web Easy to Use for Users with Disabilities (October 2001), www.nngroup.com/reports/accessibility/
Ramasastry, A.: Should web-only businesses be required to be disabledaccessible? November 7, (2002), www.cnn.com/2002/LAW/11/07/findlaw.analysis.ramasastry.disabled/index.html
Rosson, M., Carrol, J.: Usability Engineering. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2002)
Sinha, R., Hearst, M., Ivory, M., Draisin, M.: Content or graphics? an empirical analysis of criteria for award-winning websites. In: Proc. Human Factors and the Web, 7th Conference,, Madison, WI (June 2001)
Slatin, J., Rush, S.: Maximum Accessibility: Making Your Web Site More Usable for Everyone. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2003)
Thatcher, J., Waddell, C., Henry, S., Swierenga, S., Urban, M., Burks, M., Regan, B., Bohman, P.: Constructing Accessible Web Sites. Glasshouse Ltd (2002)
Dept, U.S.: of Justice. Section 508 of the rehabilitation act. sboard (2001), http://www.acces gov/sec508/guide/1194.22.htm
World Wide Web Consortium - Web Accessibility Initiative. Web content accessibility guidelines 1.0. (May 1999), www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Brajnik, G. (2004). Using Automatic Tools in Accessibility and Usability Assurance Processes. In: Stary, C., Stephanidis, C. (eds) User-Centered Interaction Paradigms for Universal Access in the Information Society. UI4ALL 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3196. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30111-0_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30111-0_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23375-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30111-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive