Skip to main content

An Approach to Evaluate Existing Ontologies for Indexing a Document Corpus

  • Conference paper
Artificial Intelligence: Methodology, Systems, and Applications (AIMSA 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3192))

Abstract

Using ontologies for IR is one of the key issues for indexing. It is not always easy to decide which ontology to use for the corpus to index. We propose to define measures reflecting the adequacy of an ontology to a corpus. The goal of these measures is to evaluate if an ontology suits a corpus, but also to compare the adequacy of two or more ontologies to the same corpus. The measures are based on a lexical and a conceptual analysis of the corpus and the ontology. We have carried out a first validation of these measures on a corpus and samples of the ontologies. The results are encouraging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aussenac-Gilles, N., Mothe, J.: Ontologies as Background Knowledge to Explore Document Collections, RIAO, pp. 129–142 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benjamins, R., Fensel, D., Decker, D., Gomez Perez, A.: (KA)2: building ontologies for the internet: a mid-term report. In: International Workshop on ontological engineering on the global information infrastructure, pp. 1–24 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bourigault, D., Fabre, C.: Approche linguistique pour l’analyse syntaxique de corpus. Cahiers de Grammaires 25, 131–151 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Borst, P.: Construction of Engineering Ontologies for Knowledge Sharing and Reuse, Ph.D Dissertation, Twente University (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bozsak, E., Ehrig, M., Handschuh, S., Hotho, A., Maedche, A., Motik, B., Oberle, D., Schmitz, C., Staab, S., Stojanovic, L., Stojanovic, N., Studer, R., Stumme, G., Sure, Y., Tane, J., Volz, R., Zacharias, V.: KAON - Towards a Large Scale Semantic Web, EC-Web 2002, pp. 304–313 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Budanitsky, A., Hirst, G.: Semantic distance in WordNet: An experimental, applicationoriented evaluation of five measures. In: Workshop on WordNet and Other Lexical Resources, ACL (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Desmontils, E., Jaquin, C.: Indexing a web site with a terminology oriented ontology. In: Cruz, I.F., Decker, S., Euzenat, J., McGuinness, D.L. (eds.) The Emerging Semantic Web, pp. 181–197. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2002) ISBN 1-58603-255-0

    Google Scholar 

  8. http://www.site.uottawa.ca:4321/astronomy/index.html

  9. Fensel, D.: Ontologies: a silver bullet for Knowledge Management and Electronic Commerce. Springer, Berlin (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Guarino, N., Masolo, C., Vetere, G.: OntoSeek: Content-Based Access to the Web. IEEE Intelligent Systems 14(3), 70–80 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gruber, R.T.: A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specification. Knowledge Acquisition (5), 199–220 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hendler, J., Berners-Lee, T., Miller, E.: Integrating Applications on the semantic Web (2002), http://www.w3.org/2002/07/swint

  13. Himsolt, M.: The graphlet system. In: North, S.C. (ed.) GD 1996. LNCS, vol. 1190, pp. 233–240. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  14. http://msowww.anu.edu.au/library/thesaurus/

  15. Jiand, J.J., Conrath, D.W.: Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical terminology, ICCL (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lin, D.: An information-theoretic definition of similarity. In: 15th international conference on Machine Learning, pp. 296–304 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lord, P.W., Stevens, R.D., Brass, A., Goble, C.A.: Semantic similarity measures as tools for exploring the Gene Ontology. In: Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, pp. 601–612 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Maedche, A., Staab, S.: Measuring similarity between ontologies. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Benjamins, V.R. (eds.) EKAW 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2473, pp. 251–263. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Masolo, C.: Ontology driven Information retrieval: Stato dell’arte, Rapport de IKF (Information and Knowledge Fusion) Eureka Project E!2235. LADSEB-Cnr, Padova (I) (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rada, R., Mili, H., Bickel, E.: Developement and application of a metric on semantic nets. IEEE transaction on systems 19(1), 17–30 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Resnik, P.: Semantic similarity in a taxonomy: an information based measure and its application to problems of ambiguity in natural langage. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 95–130 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rothenburger, B.: A Differential Approach for Knowledge Management. In: ECAI, Workshop on Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing for Ontology Engineering (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Salton, G.: The Smart retrieval system. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Staab, S., Studer, R. (eds.): Handbook on Ontologies. Series on Handbooks in Information Systems. Springer, Heidelberg (2004) ISBN 3540408347

    Google Scholar 

  25. Winston, M., Chaffin, R., Herramann, D.: A taxonomy of Part-Whole relations. Cognitive Science 11, 417–444 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wu, S.H., Tsai, T.H., Hsu, W.L.: Domain Event Extraction and Representation with Domain Ontology. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI 2003 Workshop on Information Integration on the Web, Acapulco, Mexico, pp. 33–38 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wu, Z., Palmer, M.: Verb semantics and lexical selection. In: 32nd annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (1994)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hernandez, N., Mothe, J. (2004). An Approach to Evaluate Existing Ontologies for Indexing a Document Corpus. In: Bussler, C., Fensel, D. (eds) Artificial Intelligence: Methodology, Systems, and Applications. AIMSA 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3192. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30106-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30106-6_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22959-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30106-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics