Advertisement

Interacting with Electronic Institutions

  • John Debenham
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3180)

Abstract

A three-year research project is investigating theevolution of social (business) networks in an eMarket environment. To address this issue a complete, immersive, distributed virtual trading environment has been constructed. That environment is described here. Virtual worlds technology provides an immersive environment inwhich traders are represented as avatars that interact with each other, and have access to market data and general information that is delivered by data and text mining machinery. To enrich this essentially social market place, synthetic bots have also been constructed. They too are represented by avatars, and provide ”informed idle chatter” so enriching the social fabric. They acquire their information with text and datamining machinery that continually scans market data and general financial news feeds. The middle-ware in this environment is based onpowerful multiagent technology that manages all processes including the information delivery and data mining. The investigation ofnetwork evolution leads to the development of “network mining” techniques.

Keywords

Virtual World Multiagent System User Agent Business Network Electronic Market 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Milgrom, P.: Putting Auction Theory to Work. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Debenham, J.K.: An eNegotiation Framework. In: Gedeon, T(T.) D., Fung, L.C.C. (eds.) AI 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2903, pp. 833–846. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Esteva, M., de la Cruz, D., Sierra, C. (eds.): Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Bologna, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Simoff, S.J.: Informed traders in electronic markets - mining ‘living’ data to provide context information to a negotiation process. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International We-B Conference 2002, Perth, Australia, November 28-29 (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barbosa, G.P., Silva, F.Q.B.: An electronic marketplace architecture based on technology of intelligent agents. In: Liu, J., Ye, Y. (eds.) E-Commerce Agents, Springer, Heidelberg (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Debenham, J., Simoff, S.: Investigating the evolution of electronic markets. In: Batini, C., Giunchiglia, F., Giorgini, P., Mecella, M. (eds.) CoopIS 2001. LNCS, vol. 2172, pp. 344–355. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Capin, T.K., Pandzic, I.S., Magnenat-Thalman, N., Thalman, D.: Avatars in Networked Virtual Environments. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Debenham, J.K.: Managing e-market negotiation in context with a multiagent system. In: Proceedings 21-st International Conference on Knowledge Based Systems and Applied Artificial Intelligence, ES 2002: Applications and Innovations in Expert Systems X, Cambridge, UK, pp. 261–274 (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tesfatsion, L.: How economists can get alife. In: Arthur, W.B., Durlauf, S., Lane, D.A. (eds.) The Economy as an Evolving Complex System II, pp. 534–564. Addison-Wesley Publishing, Redwood City (1997)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rosenschein, J.S., Zlotkin, G.: Rules of Encounter. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Faratin, P., Sierra, C., Jennings, N.: Using Similarity Criteria to Make Issue Trade-Offs in Automated Negotiation. Journal of Artificial Intelligence 142(2), 205–237 (2003)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kersting, K., De Raedt, L.: Adaptive Bayesian logic programs. In: Rouveirol, C., Sebag, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Inductive Logic Programming, pp. 104–117. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Müller, J.P.: The Design of Intelligent Agents. LNCS, vol. 1177. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P.: BDI Agents: From Theory to Practice. In: Proceedings First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS 1995), San Francisco, USA, pp. 312–319 (1995)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Krikorian, D.H., Lee, J.-S., Chock, T.M., Harms, C.: Isn’t That Spatial?: Distance and Communication in a 2-D Virtual Environment. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 5(4) (2000)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Simoff, S.J., Maher, M.L.: Analysing participation in collaborative design environments. Design studies 21, 119–144 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Debenham
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Information TechnologyUniversity of TechnologySydney

Personalised recommendations