Logistic Constraints on 3D Termite Construction

  • Dan Ladley
  • Seth Bullock
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3172)


The building behaviour of termites has previously been modelled mathematically in two dimensions. However, physical and logistic constraints were not taken into account in these models. Here, we develop and test a three-dimensional agent-based model of this process that places realistic constraints on the diffusion of pheromones, the movement of termites, and the integrity of the architecture that they construct. The following scenarios are modelled: the use of a pheromone template in the construction of a simple royal chamber, the effect of wind on this process, and the construction of covered pathways. We consider the role of the third dimension and the effect of logistic constraints on termite behaviour and, reciprocally, the structures that they create. For instance, when agents find it difficult to reach some elevated or exterior areas of the growing structure, building proceeds at a reduced rate in these areas, ultimately influencing the range of termite-buildable architectures.


Building Material Logistic Constraint Building Activity Trail Pheromone Termite Mound 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bonabeau, E., Guérin, S., Snyers, D., Kuntz, P., Theraulaz, G.: Three-dimensional architectures grown by simple ’stigmergic’ agents. BioSystems 56, 13–32 (2000)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bonabeau, E., Theraulaz, G., Arpin, E., Sardet, E.: The building behavior of lattice swarms. In: Brooks, R.A., Maes, P. (eds.) Artificial Life IV, pp. 307–312. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bonabeau, E., Theraulaz, G., Deneubourg, J.-L., Franks, N.R., Rafelsberger, O., Joly, J.-L., Blanco, S.: A model for the emergence of pillars, walls and royal chambers in termite nests. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 353, 1561–1576 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Deneubourg, J.-L.: Application de l’ordre par fluctuations à la description de certaines étapes de la construction du nid chez les termites. Insectes Sociaux 24, 117–130 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Deneubourg, J.-L., Goss, S., Franks, N., Pasteels, J.-M.: The blind leading the blind: Modelling chemically mediated army ant raid patterns. Journal of Insect Behaviour 2, 719–725 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deneubourg, J.-L., Theraulaz, G., Beckers, R.: Swarm-made architectures. In: Varela, F.J., Bourgine, P. (eds.) First European Conference on Artificial Life, pp. 123–133. MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Funes, P., Pollack, J.: Computer evolution of buildable objects. In: Husbands, P., Harvey, I. (eds.) Fourth European Conference on Artificial Life, pp. 358–367. MIT Press, Cambridge (1997)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grassé, P.-.P.: Termitologia, Tome II – Foundations des societés – construction, Masson, Paris (1984)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hirsch, C.: Numerical Computation of Internal and External Flows. In: Fundamentals of Numerical Discretization, vol. 1, Wiley, Chichester (1988)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Theraulaz, G., Bonabeau, E.: Modelling the collective building of complex architectures in social insects with lattice swarms. Journal of Theoretical Biology 177, 381–400 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dan Ladley
    • 1
  • Seth Bullock
    • 1
  1. 1.School of ComputingUniversity of LeedsUK

Personalised recommendations