Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3147))

Abstract

The definition of a transparent software architecture is one of the key issues in the early development phases for complex distributed and reactive software systems. We show how to derive an architecture systematically for systems with communication models based on broadcasting. Adequate graphical description techniques for capturing interaction requirements and logical component architectures for broadcasting systems are unavailable so far. We introduce an extension to UML’s sequence diagrams to capture broadcasting scenarios. Furthermore, we present methodological steps for constructively deriving structural and behavioral aspects of the architecture under consideration from the captured scenarios.

Our research was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft within the priority program “SoftSpez” (SPP 1064) under project name InTime.

This paper is a revised version of [16].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. UML 2.0 superstructure (August 2003), http://www.omg.org/uml/

  2. Beeck, M.v.d.: A Comparison of Statecharts Variants. In: Langmaack, H., de Roever, W.-P., Vytopil, J. (eds.) FTRTFT 1994 and ProCoS 1994. LNCS, vol. 863, pp. 128–148. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Björkander, M., Kobryn, C.: Architecting systems with UML 2.0, July/August 2003. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buschmann, F., Meunier, R., Rohnert, H., Sommerlad, P., Stal, M.: A System of Patterns. Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture. Wiley, Chichester (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  5. D’Souza, D., Wills, A.C.: Objects, Components, and Frameworks with UML–The Catalysis Approach. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fraunhofer-Institut für Produktionstechnik und Automatisierung IPA. Referenzfallstudie Produktionstechnik v1.3 (1999), http://tfs.cs.tu-berlin.de/SPP/themenbereiche.html

  7. Harel, D., Politi, M.: Modeling Reactive Systems with Statecharts. McGraw-Hill, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. ITU-T. ITU-T Recommendation Z.120 – Message Sequence Chart (MSC 96). ITU-T, Geneva (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  9. ITU-T. ITU-T Recommendation Z.100 – Specification and description language (SDL). ITUT, Geneva (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kruchten, P.: The Rational Unified Processs. An Introduction. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Krüger, I.: Distributed System Design with Message Sequence Charts. PhD thesis, Technische Universität München (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Krüger, I.: Notational and Methodical Issues in Forward Engineering with MSCs. In: Systä, T. (ed.) Proceedings of OOPSLA 2000 Workshop: Scenario-based round trip engineering. Tampere University of Technology, Software Systems Laboratory, Report 20 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Krüger, R., Grosu, P.: Scholz, and M. Broy. FromMSCsto statecharts. In: Rammig, F.J. (ed.) Distributed and Parallel Embedded Systems, pp. 61–71. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Krüger, I., Prenninger, W., Sandner, R.: Development of an autonomous transport system using UML-RT. Technical report, Technische Universität München (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Krüger, I., Prenninger, W., Sandner, R.: Semantics of Broadcast MSCs. In: Semantic Foundations of Engineering Design Languages, SFEDL (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Krüger, I., Prenninger, W., Sandner, R., Broy, M.: From scenarios to hierarchical broadcasting software architectures using UML-RT. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, IJSEKE (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I., Booch, G.: The Unified Modeling Language Reference Manual. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Selic, B.: Recursive Control. In: Martin, R., Riehle, D., Buschmann, F. (eds.) Pattern Languages of Program Design 3. Software Patterns Series, Addison-Wesley, Reading (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Selic, B., Gullekson, G., Ward, P.T.: Real-Time Object-Oriented Modeling. Wiley, Chichester (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Krüger, I., Prenninger, W., Sandner, R., Broy, M. (2004). Development of Hierarchical Broadcasting Software Architectures Using UML 2.0. In: Ehrig, H., et al. Integration of Software Specification Techniques for Applications in Engineering. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3147. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27863-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27863-4_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23135-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-27863-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics