Skip to main content

Implementation Issues on the Quality Evaluation of Web-Based Courses and Digital Learning Resources

  • Conference paper
  • 1047 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3143))

Abstract

The emergence of the Web as a delivery mechanism for education has led a number of organizations to develop and implement quality evaluation criteria for digital learning resources and Web- based courses. The Chinese E-Learning Technology Standardization Committee is developing a specification for evaluating Web-based courses. This paper introduces the background on the standard, CELTS-22, and its guidelines for use. Further, this paper explores critical implementation issues through a case study of two similar evaluation criteria and systems that are used by NEEDS – A Digital Library for Engineering Education and MERLOT – the Multimedia Educational Resource for Learning and Online Teaching in the United States.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. China E-Learning Technology Standards Committee. Specification for Evaluating Web- Based Courses, CELTS-22.1 CD1.0 (2004), www.celtsc.edu.cn

  2. Teng, X., Duan, C., Zhang, J., Wang, X.: The Development of CELTS-22: the Standard for Evaluating Web-Based Courses. Modern Educational Technology 11(1), 5–12 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Muramatsu, B., Agogino, A.M.: NEEDS – The National Engineering Education Delivery System: A Digital Library for Engineering Education. D–Lib Magazine 5(4) (1999), www.dlib.org/dlib/april99/muramatsu/04muramatsu.html

  4. Eibeck, P.: Criteria for Peer–Review of Engineering Courseware on the NEEDS Database. IEEE Transactions on Education, Special Issue on the Special Issue on the Application of Information Technologies to Engineering and Science Education 39(3), 381–387 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Synthesis Coalition, Quality Workshop. Synthesis Coalition: San Luis Obispo, CA (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Muramatsu, B., Eibeck, P.A., Stern, J.L., Agogino, A.M.: Effective Processes to Give Engineering Educators Easy Access to Quality–Reviewed Electronic Courseware. In: Invited Presentation, NSF Engineering Education Innovators’ Conference, Washington, D.C., April 8 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Muramatsu, B.: NEEDS Collection Development Guidelines (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hanley, G., McMartin, F.: Scaling the Peer Review Process. NSDL All Projects Meeting, Washington, D.C. (October 2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Teng, X., Muramatsu, B., Zhang, J.W., Tront, J.G., McMartin, F., Agogino, A. (2004). Implementation Issues on the Quality Evaluation of Web-Based Courses and Digital Learning Resources. In: Liu, W., Shi, Y., Li, Q. (eds) Advances in Web-Based Learning – ICWL 2004. ICWL 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3143. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27859-7_49

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27859-7_49

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22542-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-27859-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics