Skip to main content

Coordination Mechanisms

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3142))

Abstract

We introduce the notion of coordination mechanisms to improve the performance in systems with independent selfish and non-colluding agents. The quality of a coordination mechanism is measured by its price of anarchy—the worst-case performance of a Nash equilibrium over the (centrally controlled) social optimum. We give upper and lower bounds for the price of anarchy for selfish task allocation and congestion games.

Research supported in part by the IST (FLAGS, IST-2001-33116) program and by NSF.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   239.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Archer, A., Tardos, E.: Frugal Path Mechanisms. In: ACM-SIAM SODA (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cole, R., Dodis, Y., Roughgarden, T.: How much can taxes help selfish routing. In: ACM EC, pp. 98–107 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cole, R., Dodis, Y., Roughgarden, T.: Pricing network edges for heterogeneous selfish users. In: ACM STOC, pp. 521–530 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cho, Y., Sahni, S.: Bounds for list schedules on uniform processors. SIAM J. Comput. 9(1), 91–103 (1980)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Czumaj, A., Vöcking, B.: Tight Bounds for Worst-case Equilibria. In: ACM-SIAM SODA, pp. 413–420 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fabrikant, A., Papadimitriou, C., Tulwar, K.: On the complexity of pure equilibria, www.cs.berkeley.edu/~christos/papers/pure.ps

  7. Gonzalez, T., Ibarra, O., Sahni, S.: Bounds for LPT schedules on uniform processors. SIAM J. Comput. 6(1), 155–166 (1977)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Graham, R.L.: Bounds for certain multiprocessing anomalies. Bell System Technical Journal 45, 1563–1581 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Korilis, Y., Lazar, A., Orda, A.: Architecting Noncooperative Networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 13(7), 1241–1251 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Koutsoupias, E., Mavronicolas, M., Spirakis, P.: Approximate Equilibria and Ball Fusion. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Colloquium on Structural Information and Communication Complexity, SIROCCO (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Koutsoupias, E., Papadimitriou, C.H.: Worst-case equilibria. In: Meinel, C., Tison, S. (eds.) STACS 1999. LNCS, vol. 1563, pp. 404–413. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Milchtaich, I.: Congestion Games with Player-Specific Payoff Functions. Games and Economic Behavior 13, 111–124 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Monderer, D., Shapley, L.S.: Potential Games. Games and and Economic Behavior 14, 124–143 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Monderer, D., Tennenholtz, M.: k-Implementation. In: ACM EC, pp. 19–28 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nisan, N.: Algorithms for selfish agents: Mechanism design for distributed computation. In: Meinel, C., Tison, S. (eds.) STACS 1999. LNCS, vol. 1563, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Nisan, N., Ronen, A.: Algorithmic mechanism design. Games and Economic Behavior 35, 166–196 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Osborne, M.J., Rubinstein, A.: A Course in Game Theory. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Papadimitriou, C.H.: Algorithms, games, and the Internet. In: ACM STOC, pp. 749–753 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ronen, A.: Algorithms for rational agents. In: Conference on Current Trends in Theory and Practice of Informatics, pp. 56–70 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rosenthal, R.W.: A class of games possessing pure-strategy Nash equilibria. International Journal of Game Theory 2, 65–67 (1973)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Roughgarden, T.: Designing networks for selfish users is hard. In: IEEE FOCS, pp. 472–481 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Roughgarden, T.: The price of anarchy is independent of the network topology. In: ACM STOC, pp. 428-437 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Roughgarden, T., Tardos, E.: How bad is selfish routing? Journal of the ACM 49(2), 236–259 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Wardrop, J.G.: Some theoretical aspects of road traffic research. In: Proceedings of the Institute of Civil Engineers, Pt. II, vol. 1, pp. 325–378 (1952)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Christodoulou, G., Koutsoupias, E., Nanavati, A. (2004). Coordination Mechanisms. In: Díaz, J., Karhumäki, J., Lepistö, A., Sannella, D. (eds) Automata, Languages and Programming. ICALP 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3142. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27836-8_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27836-8_31

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22849-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-27836-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics