Skip to main content

Algorithms for Point Set Matching with k-Differences

  • Conference paper
  • 567 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3106))

Abstract

The largest common point set problem (LCP) is, given two point set P and Q in d-dimensional Euclidean space, to find a subset of P with the maximum cardinality that is congruent to some subset of Q. We consider a special case of LCP in which the size of the largest common point set is at least (|P|+|Q|–k)/2. We develop efficient algorithms for this special case of LCP and a related problem. In particular, we present an O(k 3 n 1.34 + kn 2 log n) time algorithm for LCP in two dimensions, which is much better for small k than an existing O(n 3.2 log n) time algorithm, where n =  max {|P|,|Q|}.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akutsu, T.: Approximate String Matching with Don’t Care Characters. Information Processing Letters 55, 235–239 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Akutsu, T.: On Determining the Congruence of Point Sets in d Dimensions. Computational Geometry, Theory and Applications 9, 247–256 (1998)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Akutsu, T., Tamaki, H., Tokuyama, T.: Distribution of Distances and Triangles in a Point Set and Algorithms for Computing the Largest Common Point Sets. Discrete and Computational Geometry 20, 307–331 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Alt, H., Melhorn, K., Wagener, H., Welzl, E.: Congruence, Similarity, and Symmetrics of Geometric Objects. Discrete and Computational Geometry 3, 237–256 (1988)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Amir, A., Farach, M.: Efficient 2-Dimensional Approximate Matching of Half- Rectangular Figures. Information and Computation 118, 1–11 (1995)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Atkinson, M.D.: An Optimal Algorithm for Geometrical Congruence. J. Algorithms 8, 159–172 (1987)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Cardoze, D.E., Schulman, L.J.: Pattern Matching for Spatial Point Sets. In: Proc. 38th Symp. Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 156–165 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Clarkson, K., Edelsbrunner, H., Guibas, L., Sharir, M., Welzl, E.: Combinatorial Complexity Bounds for Arrangements of Curves and Spheres. Discrete and Computational Geometry 5, 99–160 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Crochemore, M., Rytter, W.: Jewels of Stringology. World Scientific, Singapore (2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Highnam, P.T.: Optimal Algorithms for Finding the Symmetries of a Planar Point Set. Information Processing Letters 18, 219–222 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Indyk, P., Venketasubramanian, S.: Approximate Congruence in Nearly Linear Time. Computational Geometry, Theory and Applications 24, 115–128 (2003)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Landau, G.M., Vishkin, U.: Fast Parallel and Serial Approximate String Matching. J. Algorithms 10, 157–169 (1989)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Manacher, G.: An Application of Pattern Matching to a Problem in Geometrical Complexity. Information Processing Letters 5, 6–7 (1976)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. McCright, E.M.: A Space-Economical Suffix Tree Construction Algorithm. J. ACM 23, 262–272 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schieber, B., Vishkin, U.: On Finding Lowest Common Ancestors: Simplification and Parallelization. SIAM J. Computing 17, 1253–1262 (1988)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Székely, L.: Crossing Numbers and Hard Erdös Problems in Discrete Geometry. Combinatorics, Probability and Computing 6, 353–358 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Szemerédi, E., Trotter, W.T.: Extremal Problems in Discrete Geometry. Combinatorica 3, 381–392 (1983)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Tamayo, P., Slonim, D., Mesirov, J., Zhu, Q., Kitareewan, A., Dmitrovsky, E., Lander, E.S., Golub, T.R.: Interpreting Patterns of Gene Expression with Self- Organizing Maps: Methods and Application to Hematopoietic Differentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 2907–2912 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Akutsu, T. (2004). Algorithms for Point Set Matching with k-Differences. In: Chwa, KY., Munro, J.I.J. (eds) Computing and Combinatorics. COCOON 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3106. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27798-9_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27798-9_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22856-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-27798-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics