Skip to main content

Suitability of FIT User Acceptance Tests for Specifying Functional Requirements: Developer Perspective

  • Conference paper
Extreme Programming and Agile Methods - XP/Agile Universe 2004 (XP/Agile Universe 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3134))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The paper outlines an experiment conducted in two different academic environments, in which FIT tests were used as a functional requirements specification. Common challenges for functional requirements specifications are identified, and a comparison is made between how well prose and FIT user acceptance tests are suited to overcoming these challenges from the developer’s perspective. Experimental data and participant feedback are examined to evaluate whether developers can use requirements in the form of FIT tests to create a design and implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ben-Menachem, M., Marliss, G.: Software Quality: Producing Practical, Consistent Software. International Thomson Publishing, London (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. CenterLine Software, Inc. A Survey of 240 Fortune 1,000 companies in North America and Europe, Cambridge, MA, (1996) . Online Last accessed February 29 (2004), http://www.computerworld.com/news/1997/story/0,11280,17522,00.html

  3. Davis, A.: Software Requirements Revision Objects, Functions, & States. Prentice Hall PTR, Englewood Cliffs (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hooks, I., Farry, K.: Customer-Centered Products: Creating Successful Products Through Smart Requirements Management. American Management Association, New York, NY (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jones, C.: Patterns of Software Systems Failure and Success. International Thompson Computer Press, Boston (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Meyer, B.: On Formalism in Specifications. IEEE Software 2(1), 6–26 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. The CHAOS Chronicles. The Standish Group International,West Yarmouth, MA. Online Last accessed January 20 (2004), http://www1.standishgroup.com//chaos/intro2.php

  8. Van Vliet, H.: Software Engineering: Principles and Practice, 2/e, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Young, R.: Effective Requirements Practices, Addison-Wesley, Boston (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Melnik, G., Read, K., Maurer, F. (2004). Suitability of FIT User Acceptance Tests for Specifying Functional Requirements: Developer Perspective. In: Zannier, C., Erdogmus, H., Lindstrom, L. (eds) Extreme Programming and Agile Methods - XP/Agile Universe 2004. XP/Agile Universe 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3134. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27777-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27777-4_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22839-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-27777-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics