Skip to main content

Sample Size Determination in Epidemiologic Studies

  • Chapter
Handbook of Epidemiology

Abstract

When planning a research project an epidemiologist must consider how many subjects should be studied. While factors such as available budget certainly present constraints on the maximum-number of subjects that might actually be included in a study, statistical considerations are extremely important. To address the statistical questions about appropriate sample size, the researcher must first specify the study design, the nature of the outcome variable, the aims of the study, the planned analysis method, and the expected results of the study. Is the goal of the study to distinguish between hypotheses about the value of a parameter or function of parameters, or is the goal to provide a confidence interval estimate of a parameter such as the odds ratio or relative risk?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 199.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Chernick MR, Liu CY (2002) The saw-toothed behavior of power versus sample size and software solutions: single binomial proportion using exact methods. The American Statistician 56:149–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon WJ, Massey FJ (1983) Introduction to statistical analysis. 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Elashoff JD (2005) nQuery Advisor® Release 6. Statistical Solutions, Ireland

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleiss JL (1981) Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fleiss JL, Tytun A, Ury SH (1980) A simple approximation for calculating sample sizes for comparing independent proportions. Biometrics 36:343–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hettmansperger TP (1984) Statistical inference based on ranks. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression. 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh FY (1989) Sample size tables for logistic regression. Statistics in Medicine 8:795–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh FY, Bloch DA, Larsen MD (1998) A simple method of sample size calculation for linear and logistic regression. Statistics in Medicine 17:1623–1634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korn EL (1986) Sample size tables for bounding small proportions. Biometrics 42:213–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupper LL, Hafner KB (1989) How appropriate are popular sample size formulas? The American Statistician 43:101–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachin JM (1981) Introduction to sample size determination and power analysis for clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 2:93–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachin JM (1992) Power and sample size evaluation for the McNemar test with application to matched case-control studies. Statistics in Medicine 11:1239–1251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemeshow S, Hosmer DW, Klar J, Lwanga SK (1990) Adequacy of sample size in health studies. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy PS, Lemeshow S (1999) Sampling of populations: methods and applications, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Louis TA (1981) Confidence intervals for a binomial parameter after observing no successes. The American Statistician 35:154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machin D, Campbell MJ (1987) Statistical tables for design of clinical trials. Black-well Scientific Publications, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Machin D, Campbell M, Fayers P, Pinol A (1997) Sample size tables for clinical studies. 2nd edn. Malden and Carlton: Blackwell Science, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser BK, Stevens GR, Watts CL (1989) The two-sample t test versus Satterthwaite’s approximate F test. Commun. Statist.-Theory Meth. 18:3963–3975

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Muller KE, Barton CN (1989) Approximate power for repeated-measures ANOVA lacking sphericity. Journal of the American Statistical Association 84:549–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noether GE (1987) Sample size determination for some common nonparametric tests. Journal of the American Statistical Association 82:645–647

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien RG, Muller KE (1983) Applied analysis of variance in behavioral science. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 297–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Peduzzi PN, Concato J, Kemper E, Holford TR, Feinstein A (1996) A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 99:1373–1379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosner B (2000) Fundamentals of Biostatistics. 5th edn. Duxbury Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitemore AS (1981) Sample size for logistic regression with small response probability. Journal of the American Statistical Association 76:27–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Elashoff, J.D., Lemeshow, S. (2005). Sample Size Determination in Epidemiologic Studies. In: Ahrens, W., Pigeot, I. (eds) Handbook of Epidemiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-26577-1_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics