Abstract
When developing large software products many verbal and written interactions take place. In such interactions the use of abstract and uncertain expressions is considered advantageous. Traditionally, this is not the case for statements which are imprecise in the sense of being vague or subjective. In this paper we argue that such statements should not only be tolerated but, often, they can be very useful in interaction. For this purpose we relate abstraction, uncertainty and impreciseness to each other by investigating the differences and common properties. We also discuss the relation to the use of common sense implementations in Artificial Intelligence. The introduction of degrees of impreciseness leads to the question of finding an optimal level. This is interpreted as a learning problem for software organizations. The success can be measured in terms of different cost factors. The design of evaluation experiments is shown as an interdisciplinary task.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Boehm, B., Turner, R.: Balancing Agility and Discipline: A Guide for Perplexed. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2003)
Bruner, J., Goodnow, J., Austin, G.: A Study of Thinking. Wiley, New York (1956)
Hussmann, H.: Indirect Use of Formal methods in Software Engineering, Online http://www.inf.tu-dresden.de/ST2/ST/papers/icse17-ws.pdf (last accessed March 1, 2004)
Lakoff, G.: Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1987)
Lakoff, G., Johnson, M.: Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1980)
Mervis, C., Rosch, E.: Categorization of Natural Objects. Annual Review in Psychology 32, 89–115 (1981)
Schach, S.: Object-oriented and Classical Software Engineering, 5/e, p. 36. McGraw-Hill, New York (2002)
Stroustrup, B.: Interview to Artima, September 2003, Online http://www.artima.com/intv/abstreffi.html (last accessed March 1, 2004)
Wache, H.: Semantische Mediation für heterogene Informationsquellen. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft Aka GmbH, Dissertationen zur Künstlichen Intelligenz, Berlin (in German), Online http://www-agki.tzi.de/grp/ag-ki/download/2003/wache03.pdf (last accessed March 1, 2004)
Wiederhold, G.: Mediators in the Architecture of Future Information Systems. IEEE Computer 25(3), 38–49 (1992)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Melnik, G., Richter, M.M. (2004). Impreciseness and Its Value from the Perspective of Software Organizations and Learning. In: Melnik, G., Holz, H. (eds) Advances in Learning Software Organizations. LSO 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3096. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25983-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25983-1_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22192-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-25983-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive