Skip to main content

A Combined Logic of Expectation and Observation

A Generalisation of BDI Logics

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2990))

Abstract

Although BDI logics have shown many advantages in modelling agent systems, the crucial problem of having computationally ungrounded semantics poses big challenges when extending the theories to multi-agent systems in an interactive, dynamic environment. The root cause lies at the inability of modal languages to refer to the world states which hampers agent reasoning about the connection of its mental attitudes and its world. In this paper, following ideas in hybrid logics, we attempt to readdress the computational grounding problem. Then, we provide a formalism for observations – the only connection between mind and worlds – and expectations – the mental states associated with observations. Finally, we compare our framework with BDI logics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hintikka, J.: Knowledge and Belief: An Introduction to the Logic of The Two Notions. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bratman, M.E.: Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rao, A., Georgeff, M.: Modelling rational agents within a BDI-architecture. In: Fikes, R., Sandewall, E. (eds.) Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, Cambridge (USA), pp. 473–484 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Woolridge, M.: Computationally Grounded Theories of Agency. In: Durfee, E.H. (ed.) Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS 2000), vol. 9, IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rao, A.: AgentSpeak(L): BDI Agents speak out in a logical computable language. In: Perram, J., Van de Velde, W. (eds.) MAAMAW 1996. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1038, pp. 42–55. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Blackburn, P.: Internalizing labelled deduction. Journal of Logic and Computation 10, 137–168 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Blackburn, P., Tzakova, M.: Hybrid languages and temporal logic. Logic Journal of the IGPL 7, 27–54 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Wooldridge, M.: The Logical Modelling of Computational Multi-Agent Systems. PhD thesis, University of Manchester (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fagin, R., Halpern, J.Y., Vardi, M.Y.: What can machines know? on the properties of knowledge in distributed systems. Journal of the ACM 39, 328–376 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Areces, C., Blackburn, P., Marx, M.: Hybrid logics: Characterization, interpolation and complexity. Journal of Symbolic Logic 66, 977–1010 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Blackburn, P., de Rijke, M., Venema, Y.: Modal logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. van Benthem, J.: Modal Logic and Classical Logic. Bibliopolis, Naples (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Woolridge, M.: An introduction to MultiAgent System. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Benerecetti, M., Giunchglia, F., Serafini, L.: A model checking algorithm for multiagent systems. In: Rao, A.S., Singh, M.P., Müller, J.P. (eds.) ATAL 1998. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1555, pp. 163–176. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Rao, A., Georgeff, M.: A model-theoretic approach to the verification of situated reasoning systems. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 1993), Chambéry, France, pp. 318–324 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Blackburn, P.: Nominal tense logic. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 34, 56–83 (1993)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Gove, P.B. (ed.): Webster’s Revised Unabridged Dictionary, 3rd edn. Merriam Webster Inc. (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rao, A., Georgeff, M.: Asymmetry thesis and side-effect problems in linear-time and branching-time intention logics. In: Myopoulos, J., Reiter, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 12th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 1991), Sydney, Australia, pp. 498–505. Morgan Kaufmann publishers Inc., San Mateo (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cohen, P.R., Levesque, H.J.: Intention is choice with commitment. Artificial Intelligence 42, 213–261 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Emerson, E.A., Halpern, J.Y.: “sometimes” and “not never” revisited: on branching time versus linear time temporal logic. Journal of the ACM 33, 151–178 (1986)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Winikoff, M., Padgham, L., Harland, J., Thangarajah, J.: Declarative and procedural goals in intelligent agent systems. In: Eighth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 470–481 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Blackburn, P.: Representation, reasoning, and relational structures: a hybrid logic manifesto. Logic Journal of the IGPL 8, 339–625 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Fagin, R., Halpern, J.Y., Moses, Y., Vardi, M.Y.: Reasoning about Knowledge. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Woolridge, M., Lomuscio, A.: Multi-agent \(\mathcal{VSK}\) logic. In: Brewka, G., Moniz Pereira, L., Ojeda-Aciego, M., de Guzmán, I.P. (eds.) JELIA 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1919, p. 300. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Woolridge, M., Lomuscio, A.: Reasoning about visibility, perception, and knowledge. In: Jennings, N., Lespérance, Y. (eds.) ATAL 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1757, Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kaelbling, L.P., Littman, M.L., Cassandra, A.R.: Planning and acting in partially observable stochastic domains. Artificial Intelligence 101, 99–134 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. van der Meyden, R.: Common knowledge and update in finite environments. Information and Computation 140, 115–157 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Gabbay, D.: Fibring Logics. Oxford Logic Guides, vol. 38. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. D’Agostino, M., Gabbay, D.: A generalization of analytic deduction via labelled deductive systems. Part I: Basic substructural logics. Journal of Automated Reasoning 13, 243–281 (1994)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Trân, B.V., Harland, J., Hamilton, M. (2004). A Combined Logic of Expectation and Observation. In: Leite, J., Omicini, A., Sterling, L., Torroni, P. (eds) Declarative Agent Languages and Technologies. DALT 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2990. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25932-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25932-9_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22124-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-25932-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics