Skip to main content

A Model of Normative Multi-agent Systems and Dynamic Relationships

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2934))

Abstract

For agents, one of the advantages of being part of a society is the satisfaction of those goals whose success depends on the abilities of other agents. In turn, societies are controlled by norms and, consequently, agents must be able first to model the society in which they exist, and then to identify the different relationships, due to norms, in which they might be involved in order to act appropriately. Both of these could mean the difference between the success or failure of their goals. To this end, this paper focuses on the identification of the basic components of norm-based systems, and on representing and analysing the dynamic relationships between member agents which result from the processing of norms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balzer, W., Tuomela, R.: Social institutions, norms and practices. In: Dellarocas, C., Conte, R. (eds.) Social Order in Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 161–180. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boella, G., Lesmo, L.: Deliberative normative agents. In: Dellarocas, C., Conte, R. (eds.) Social Order in Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 85–110. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Conte, R., Castelfranchi, C.: Cognitive and Social Action. UCL Press, London (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Conte, R., Castelfranchi, C.: Norms as mental objects. In: Müller, J.P., Castelfranchi, C. (eds.) MAAMAW 1993. LNCS, vol. 957, pp. 186–196. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Conte, R., Falcone, R., Sartor, G.: Agents and norms: How to fill the gap? Artificial Intelligence and Law 7(1), 1–15 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dellarocas, C., Klein, M.: Contractual agent societies: Negotiated shared context and social control in open multi-agent systems. In: Dellarocas, C., Conte, R. (eds.) Social Order in Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 113–133. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dignum, F.: Autonomous agents with norms. Artificial Intelligence and Law 7(1), 69–79 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dignum, F., Morley, D., Sonenberg, E., Cavendon, L.: Towards socially sophisticated BDI agents. In: Durfee, E. (ed.) Proceedings on the Fourth International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS 2000), pp. 111–118. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Dignum, V., Dignum, F.: Modelling agent societies: Coordination frameworks and institutions. In: Brazdil, P.B., Jorge, A.M. (eds.) EPIA 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2258, pp. 191–204. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. d’Inverno, M., Luck, M.: Understanding Agent Systems. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Esteva, M., Padget, J., Sierra, C.: Formalizing a language for institutions and norms. In: Meyer, J.-J.C., Tambe, M. (eds.) ATAL 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2333, pp. 348–366. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Jones, A., Sergot, M.: A formal characterisation of institutionalised power. Logic Journal of the IGPL 4(3), 429–445 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. López y López, F., Luck, M.: Modelling norms for autonomous agents. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Mexican International Conference on Computer Science (ENC 2003). IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2003) (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  14. López y López, F., Luck, M., d’Inverno, M.: Constraining autonomy through norms. In: Castelfranchi, C., Johnson, W. (eds.) Proceedings of The First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems AAMAS 2002, pp. 674–681. ACM Press, New York (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Luck, M., d’Inverno, M.: A formal framework for agency and autonomy. In: Lesser, V., Gasser, L. (eds.) Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS 1995), pp. 254–260. AAAI Press/MIT Press (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Moses, Y., Tennenholtz, M.: Artificial social systems. Technical report CS90-12, Weizmann Institute, Israel (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ross, A.: Directives and Norms. Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd., London (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sergot, M.: Normative positions. In: Mc Namara, P., Prakken, H. (eds.) Norms, Logics and Information Systems, pp. 289–308. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Singh, M.: An ontology for commitments in multiagent systems: Toward a unification of normative concepts. Artificial Intelligence and Law 7(1), 97–113 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Spivey, J.M.: The Z Notation: A Reference Manual. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tuomela, R.: The Importance of Us: A Philosophical Study of Basic Social Norms. Stanford University Press, Stanford (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Walker, A., Wooldridge, M.: Understanding the emergence of conventions in multi-agent systems. In: Lesser, V., Gasser, L. (eds.) Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS 1995), pp. 384–389. AAAI Press/MIT Press (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wieringa, R., Dignum, F., Meyer, J., Kuiper, R.: A modal approach to intentions, commitments and obligations: Intention plus commitment yields obligation. In: Brown, M., Carmo, J. (eds.) Deontic Logic, Agency and Normative Systems, pp. 80–97. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

López y López, F., Luck, M. (2004). A Model of Normative Multi-agent Systems and Dynamic Relationships. In: Lindemann, G., Moldt, D., Paolucci, M. (eds) Regulated Agent-Based Social Systems. RASTA 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2934. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25867-4_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25867-4_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20923-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-25867-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics