Abstract
For agents, one of the advantages of being part of a society is the satisfaction of those goals whose success depends on the abilities of other agents. In turn, societies are controlled by norms and, consequently, agents must be able first to model the society in which they exist, and then to identify the different relationships, due to norms, in which they might be involved in order to act appropriately. Both of these could mean the difference between the success or failure of their goals. To this end, this paper focuses on the identification of the basic components of norm-based systems, and on representing and analysing the dynamic relationships between member agents which result from the processing of norms.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Balzer, W., Tuomela, R.: Social institutions, norms and practices. In: Dellarocas, C., Conte, R. (eds.) Social Order in Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 161–180. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2001)
Boella, G., Lesmo, L.: Deliberative normative agents. In: Dellarocas, C., Conte, R. (eds.) Social Order in Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 85–110. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2001)
Conte, R., Castelfranchi, C.: Cognitive and Social Action. UCL Press, London (1995)
Conte, R., Castelfranchi, C.: Norms as mental objects. In: Müller, J.P., Castelfranchi, C. (eds.) MAAMAW 1993. LNCS, vol. 957, pp. 186–196. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)
Conte, R., Falcone, R., Sartor, G.: Agents and norms: How to fill the gap? Artificial Intelligence and Law 7(1), 1–15 (1999)
Dellarocas, C., Klein, M.: Contractual agent societies: Negotiated shared context and social control in open multi-agent systems. In: Dellarocas, C., Conte, R. (eds.) Social Order in Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 113–133. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2001)
Dignum, F.: Autonomous agents with norms. Artificial Intelligence and Law 7(1), 69–79 (1999)
Dignum, F., Morley, D., Sonenberg, E., Cavendon, L.: Towards socially sophisticated BDI agents. In: Durfee, E. (ed.) Proceedings on the Fourth International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS 2000), pp. 111–118. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2000)
Dignum, V., Dignum, F.: Modelling agent societies: Coordination frameworks and institutions. In: Brazdil, P.B., Jorge, A.M. (eds.) EPIA 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2258, pp. 191–204. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
d’Inverno, M., Luck, M.: Understanding Agent Systems. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Esteva, M., Padget, J., Sierra, C.: Formalizing a language for institutions and norms. In: Meyer, J.-J.C., Tambe, M. (eds.) ATAL 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2333, pp. 348–366. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Jones, A., Sergot, M.: A formal characterisation of institutionalised power. Logic Journal of the IGPL 4(3), 429–445 (1996)
López y López, F., Luck, M.: Modelling norms for autonomous agents. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Mexican International Conference on Computer Science (ENC 2003). IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2003) (to appear)
López y López, F., Luck, M., d’Inverno, M.: Constraining autonomy through norms. In: Castelfranchi, C., Johnson, W. (eds.) Proceedings of The First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems AAMAS 2002, pp. 674–681. ACM Press, New York (2002)
Luck, M., d’Inverno, M.: A formal framework for agency and autonomy. In: Lesser, V., Gasser, L. (eds.) Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS 1995), pp. 254–260. AAAI Press/MIT Press (1995)
Moses, Y., Tennenholtz, M.: Artificial social systems. Technical report CS90-12, Weizmann Institute, Israel (1990)
Ross, A.: Directives and Norms. Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd., London (1968)
Sergot, M.: Normative positions. In: Mc Namara, P., Prakken, H. (eds.) Norms, Logics and Information Systems, pp. 289–308. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1999)
Singh, M.: An ontology for commitments in multiagent systems: Toward a unification of normative concepts. Artificial Intelligence and Law 7(1), 97–113 (1999)
Spivey, J.M.: The Z Notation: A Reference Manual. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1992)
Tuomela, R.: The Importance of Us: A Philosophical Study of Basic Social Norms. Stanford University Press, Stanford (1995)
Walker, A., Wooldridge, M.: Understanding the emergence of conventions in multi-agent systems. In: Lesser, V., Gasser, L. (eds.) Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS 1995), pp. 384–389. AAAI Press/MIT Press (1995)
Wieringa, R., Dignum, F., Meyer, J., Kuiper, R.: A modal approach to intentions, commitments and obligations: Intention plus commitment yields obligation. In: Brown, M., Carmo, J. (eds.) Deontic Logic, Agency and Normative Systems, pp. 80–97. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
López y López, F., Luck, M. (2004). A Model of Normative Multi-agent Systems and Dynamic Relationships. In: Lindemann, G., Moldt, D., Paolucci, M. (eds) Regulated Agent-Based Social Systems. RASTA 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2934. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25867-4_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25867-4_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20923-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-25867-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive