Skip to main content

Dependency Structure Matrix Analysis: Offline Utility of the Dependency Structure Matrix Genetic Algorithm

  • Conference paper
Genetic and Evolutionary Computation – GECCO 2004 (GECCO 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3103))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper investigates the off-line use of the dependency structure matrix genetic algorithm (DSMGA). In particular, a problem-specific crossover operator is design by performing dependency structure matrix (DSM) analysis. The advantages and disadvantages of such an off-line use are discussed. Two schemes that helps the off-line usage are proposed. Finally, those off-line schemes are demonstrated by DSMGA on MaxTrap functions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Yu, T.-L., Goldberg, D.E., Yassine, A., Chen, Y.-p.: Genetic algorithm design inspired by organizational theory: Pilot study of a dependency structure matrix driven genetic algorithm. In: Proceedings of Artificial Neural Networks in Engineering 2003 (ANNIE 2003), pp. 327–332 (2003) (Also IlliGAL Report No. 2003007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Holland, J.H.: Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goldberg, D.E.: The design of innovation: Lessons from and for competent genetic algorithms. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Steward, D.V.: The design structure system: A method for managing the design of complex systems. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 28, 74–77 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yassine, A., Falkenburg, D.R., Chelst, K.: Engineering design management: An information structure approach. International Journal of production research 37, 2957–2975 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Yu, T.-L., Yassine, A., Goldberg, D.E.: A genetic algorithm for developing modular product architectures. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2003 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences, 15th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, DETC 2003 (2003) DTM–48657 (Also IlliGAL Report No. 2003024)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pelikan, M., Goldberg, D.E., Lobo, F.G.: A survey of optimization by building and using probabilistic models. IlliGAL Report No. 99018, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois Genetic Algorithms Laboratory, Urbana, IL (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Larrañaga, P., Lozano, J.A. (eds.): Estimation of Distribution Algorithms. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Sharman, D., Yassine, A., Carlile, P.: Characterizing modular architectures. In: ASME 14th International Conference, DTM-34024 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Munetomo, M., Goldberg, D.E.: Identifying linkage groups by nonlinearity/nonmonotonicity detection. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference 1999, vol. 1, pp. 433–440 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Thierens, D., Goldberg, D.E.: Convergence models of genetic algorithm selection schemes. In: Davidor, Y., Männer, R., Schwefel, H.-P. (eds.) PPSN 1994. LNCS, vol. 866, pp. 119–129. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Goldberg, D.E., Korb, B., Deb, K.: Messy genetic algorithms: Motivation, analysis, and first results. Complex Systems 3, 493–530 (1989)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Kargupta, H.: The performance of the gene expression messy genetic algorithm on real test functions. In: Proceedings of 1996 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 631–636 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Smith, J., Fogarty, T.C.: Recombination strategy adaptation via evolution of gene linkage. In: Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 826–831 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Harik, G.R., Goldberg, D.E.: Learning linkage. Foundations of Genetic Algorithms 4, 247–262 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pelikan, M.: Bayesian optimization algorithm: From single level to hierarchy. Ph.d. dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (2002) (Also IlliGAL Report No. 2002023)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mühlenbein, H., Schlierkamp-Voosen, D.: Predictive models for the breeder genetic algorithm: I. Continuous parameter optimization. Evolutionary Computation 1, 25–49 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ceroni, A., Pelikan, M., Goldberg, D.E.: Convergence-time models for the simple genetic algorithm with finite population. IlliGAL Report No. 2001028, Illinois Genetic Algorithms Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Harik, G., Cantú-Paz, E., Goldberg, D.E., Miller, B.L.: The gambler’s ruin problem, genetic algorithms, and the sizing of populations. In: Proceedings of 1997 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 7–12 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Goldberg, D.E., Deb, K., Clark, J.H.: Genetic algorithms, noise, and the sizing of populations. Complex Systems 6, 333–362 (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Yu, T.-L., Goldberg, D.E.: Toward an understanding of the quality and efficiency of model building for genetic algorithms. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference 2004 (2004) (to appear) (Also IlliGAL Report No. 2004004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Simon, H.A.: The Sciences of the Artificial. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Harik, G.R., Lobo, F.G.: A parameter-less genetic algorithm. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference 1999, vol. 1, pp. 258–265 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sastry, K., Goldberg, D.E.: Analysis of mixing in genetic algorithms: A survey. IlliGAL Report No. 2002012, Illinois Genetic Algorithms Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Deb, K., Goldberg, D.E.: Analyzing deception in trap functions. Foundations of Genetic Algorithms 2, 93–108 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yu, TL., Goldberg, D.E. (2004). Dependency Structure Matrix Analysis: Offline Utility of the Dependency Structure Matrix Genetic Algorithm. In: Deb, K. (eds) Genetic and Evolutionary Computation – GECCO 2004. GECCO 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3103. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24855-2_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24855-2_31

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22343-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24855-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics