Skip to main content

Ruffled by Ridges: How Evolutionary Algorithms Can Fail

  • Conference paper
Genetic and Evolutionary Computation – GECCO 2004 (GECCO 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3103))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The representations currently used by local search and some evolutionary algorithms have the disadvantage that these algorithms are partially blind to “ridges” in the search space. Both heuristics search and gradient search algorithms can exhibit extremely slow convergence on functions that display ridge structures. A class of rotated representations are proposed and explored; these rotated representations can be based on Principal Components Analysis, or use the Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization method. Some algorithms, such as CMA-ES, already make use of similar rotated representations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Rosenbrock, H.: An automatic method for finding the greatest or least value of a function. Computer Journal 3, 175–184 (1960)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Brent, R.: Algorithms for Minization with Derivatives. Dover (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Whitley, D., Barbulescu, L., Watson, J.: Local Search and High Precision Gray Codes. In: Foundations of Genetic Algorithms FOGA-6, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rana, S., Whitley, D.: Representations, Search and Local Optima. In: 14th National Conf on Artificial Intelligence AAAI 1997, pp. 497–502(1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Syswerda, G.: Simulated Crossover in Genetic Algorithms. In: Whitley, D. (ed.) FOGA - 2, pp. 239–255. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kazadi, S.T.: Conjugate schema and basis representation of crossover and mutation operators. Evolutionary Computation 6, 129–160 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wyatt, D., Lipson, H.: Finding building blocks through eigenstructure adaptation. In: GECCO, pp. 1518–1529. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Salomon, R.: Reevaluating Genetic Algorithm Performance under Coordinate Rotation of Benchmark Functions. Biosystems 39(3), 263–278 (1960)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mühlenbein, H., Schlierkamp-Voosen, D.: Predictive Models for the Breeder Genetic Algorithm. Journal of Evolutionary Computation 1, 25–49 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Oyman, A., Schwefel, H.B.H.: Where elitists start limping: Evolution strategies at ridge functions. In: Eiben, A.E., Bäck, T., Schoenauer, M., Schwefel, H.-P. (eds.) PPSN 1998. LNCS, vol. 1498, pp. 34–43. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. DeJong, K.: An Analysis of the Behavior of a Class of Genetic Adaptive Systems. PhD thesis, University of Michigan, Dept. of Computer and Communication Sciences (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nelder, J., Mead, R.: A simplex method for function minimization. Computer Journal 7, 308–313 (1965)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Davis, L.: Bit-Climbing, Representational Bias, and Test Suite Design. In: Booker, L., Belew, R. (eds.) Proc. of the 4th Int’l. Conf. on GAs, pp. 18–23. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bäck, T.: Evolutionary Algorithms in Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Hansen, N., Ostermeier, A.: Completely derandomized self-adaptation in evolution strategies. Evolutionary Computation 9, 159–195 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ostermeier, A., Gawelczyk, A., Hansen, N.: A derandomized approach to selfadaptation of evolution strategies. Evolutionary Computation 2, 369–380 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hansen, N., Mãller, S., Koumoutsakos, P.: Reducing the time complexity of the derandomized evolution strategy with covariance matrix adaptation. Evolutionary Computation 11, 1–18 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Whitley, D., Lunacek, M., Knight, J. (2004). Ruffled by Ridges: How Evolutionary Algorithms Can Fail. In: Deb, K. (eds) Genetic and Evolutionary Computation – GECCO 2004. GECCO 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3103. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24855-2_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24855-2_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22343-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24855-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics