Skip to main content

Sectoral Employment Elasticities in Germany

  • Chapter
Labor Markets and Social Security
  • 126 Accesses

Abstract

In the last few years, unemployment has both grown and persisted in most of the western industrial countries. However, at the same time it seems that the international competition has become more fierce. A frequently expressed opinion is that the globalisation of the economy or the internationalisation of production are real challenges which the German economy has to face and to which it reacted late but obviously not too late. Bearing this in mind, the question of what contribution an accelerated economic growth could make to reduce unemployment has become more and more interesting. There are two contrasting positions in this regard:

  • On the one hand it is argued, that an acceleration of investment in all sectors and divisions of enterprises may be necessary to increase the long-term growth of labour productivity, production potential and production and thereby ultimately to increase the real income. These ideas — which also correspond to the fundamentals of the “New Growth Theory” — are laid down, for example, in the most recent EU’s Greenbook (EUROPĂ„ISCHE KOMMISSION, 1996) or the OECD’s Job Initiative (OECD, 1994 and 1995).

  • On the other hand, there are doubts whether long-term growth alone might lead to a reduction of unemployment; on the contrary, it may be assumed that growth and employment are diverging. As a rule, structural factors and/or a hysteresis phenomenon on the labour market are to a large extent identified as a reason for the lack of employment. Others argue that even economic growth cannot and should not be a solution to the labour market problems of the industrial countries because of ecological reasons (the sufficiency-hypothesis).

The author is very grateful to H.J. SCHALK, T. SIEBE and R. GRASKAMP for helpful comments and assistance. As usual, the author is responsible for all remaining faults.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • BUTTLER, G. and HOF, B. (1977), Bevölkerung und Arbeitsmarkt bis zum Jahr 2000. Köln: Deutscher Instituts Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • ERBER, G. (1995), Verdoorn’s or Okun’s Law? Employment and Growth Experiences in OECD Countries, 1960–1993. (DIW-Diskussionspapiere No. 98), Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • EUROPĂ„ISCHE KOMMISSION, ed. (1996), GrĂĽnbuch zur Innovation, Bulletin der Europäischen Union, Beilage 5/95. BrĂĽssel: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • GORDON, R.J. (1984), Unemployment and Potential Output in the 1980s, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, vol. 1, 537–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HAMADA, K. (1984), The Relationship Between Production and Unemployment in Japan. Okun’s Law in Comparative Perspective, European Economic Review, 71–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • HEILEMANN, U. and JOCHIMSEN, R. (1993), Christmas in July? The Political Economy of German Unification Reconsidered. Brookings Occasional Papers, Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • HEISE, A. (1996), Faktorintensität und Beschäftigung. Ein alternativer Verdoorn-Ansatz, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Studium, 243–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • HOF, B. (1991), Die Beschäftigungsschwelle, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Studium, vol. 20, 281–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • HOF, B. (1994), Beschäftigungsschwelle und Wachstum–was besagt die Empirie? ifoStudien, vol. 40, 127–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • HOF, B. (1995), Gleichgewicht durch andere Verteilung? Arbeitsmarktentwicklung im Systemzusammenhang, iw-trends, No. 3, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • KLAU, F. and MITTELSTĂ„DT, A. (1986), Labour Market Flexibility, OECD Economic Studies, No. 6. Paris: OECD, p. 8–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • KLAUDER, W. (1990), Zur Entwicklung von Produktivität und Beschäftigungsschwelle, Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt-und Berufsforschung, vol. 23, 86–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • KLOS, H.-P. and KROKER, R. (1996), Arbeitsmarktperformance und Arbeitsmarktverfassung. Ein deutsch-amerikanischer Vergleich, iw-trends, No. 2, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • LAMBERTS, W. (1976a), Das Produktivitätspotential der westdeutschen Volkswirtschaft, RWI-Mitteilungen, vol. 27, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • LAMBERTS, W. (1976b), Produktivitätsperspektiven der deutschen Volkswirtschaft, RWIMitteilungen, vol. 27, 177–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • LOBBE, K. et al. (1994), Strukturwandel in der Krise. Analyse der strukturellen Entwicklung der deutschen Wirtschaft - Strukturberichterstattung 1993. (Untersuchungen des Rheinisch-Westfälischen Instituts fĂĽr Wirtschaftsforschung, Heft 9.).

    Google Scholar 

  • MAJER, H. (1996), Entkoppelung. Wirtschaft und Studium, vol. 25, 150–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • MCCOMBIE, J.S.L. (1991), Verdoorn’s Law, The New Palgrave, London: MacMillan Press, vol. 4, 804–806.

    Google Scholar 

  • OKUN, A.M. (1962), Potential GNP: Its Measurement and Significance. (Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section of the American Statistical Association.) Washington D.C., 98–103. Reprinted in J.A. Pechman ed. (1983), Selected Essays of Arthur M. Okun, Cambridge, M.A. and London: MIT Press, 145–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD, ed. (1994), The OECD Jobs Study - Evidence and Explanations. Part I: Labour Market Trends and Underlying Forces of Change. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD, ed. (1995), The OECD Jobs Study - Investment, Productivity and Employment. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • PERRY, G.L. (1977), Potential Output and Productivity. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Washington, D.C., 11–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • PUSSE, L. (1990), Ăśberlegungen zur formalen und empirischen Bestimmung der Beschäftigungsschwelle, Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt-und Berufsforschung, vol. 23, 100–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • RWI, ed. (1983), Analyse der strukturellen Entwicklung der deutschen Wirtschaft - RWIStrukturberichterstattung 1983. Band 1: Gesamtdarstellung. Gutachten im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums fĂĽr Wirtschaft. (Bearb.: K. Löbbe et al.): Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut fĂĽr Wirtschaftsforschung.

    Google Scholar 

  • RWI, ed. (1995), RWI-Konjunkturberichte, Berlin, vol. 46, No. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • RWI, ed. (1996), Der Wirtschaftsstandort Deutschland vor dem Hintergrund regionaler Entwicklungstendenzen in Europa. Schwerpunktthema zur sektoralen Strukturberichterstattung. Gutachten im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums fĂĽr Wirtschaft. ( Bearb.: K. Löbbe u.a. ).

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHALK, H.J. (1991), Zur Entkoppelungsthese von Wachstum und Beschäftigung: Eine empirische Untersuchung mit Okun’s Law fĂĽr die Bundesrepublik Deutschland, RWIMitteilungen, vol. 42, 205–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHRODER, C. (1995), Beschäftigung und Arbeitslosigkeit im internationalen Vergleich, iw-trends, No. 3, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • TOBIN, J. (1991), Okun, Arthur M., The New Palgrave, London: MacMillan Press, vol. 3, 700–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • VERDOORN, P.J. (1949), Fattori che regolato la sviluppa della produttiva del lavoro. “L’Industria”, vol. 1, No. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • VERDOORN, P.J. (1951), On an Empirical Law Governing the Productivity of Labor, Econometrica, vol. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • WALTER, C. (1994), Zur Dynamik des Arbeitsmarktes in den Vereinigten Staaten, Die Weltwirtschaft, No. 1, 113–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • HOF, B. (1995), Die Latte liegt wieder höher, iwd; Nr. 50, 14. Dezember, 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • LĂśSCHOW, J., SCHALK, H.J., UNTIEDT, G (1995), Langfristige regionale Arbeitsmarktentwicklung - Prognosen fĂĽr die Bundesländer Deutschlands fĂĽr die Jahre 2000 und 2010, Gutachten im Auftrag der Bundesforschungsanstalt fĂĽr Landeskunde und Raumordnung, MĂĽnster.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Löbbe, K., Schalk, H.J. (2004). Sectoral Employment Elasticities in Germany. In: Addison, J.T., Welfens, P.J.J. (eds) Labor Markets and Social Security. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24780-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24780-7_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-53462-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24780-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics