Skip to main content

A Simulated Study of Implicit Feedback Models

  • Conference paper
Book cover Advances in Information Retrieval (ECIR 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2997))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper we report on a study of implicit feedback models for unobtrusively tracking the information needs of searchers. Such models use relevance information gathered from searcher interaction and can be a potential substitute for explicit relevance feedback. We introduce a variety of implicit feedback models designed to enhance an Information Retrieval (IR) system’s representation of searchers’ information needs. To benchmark their performance we use a simulation-centric evaluation methodology that measures how well each model learns relevance and improves search effectiveness. The results show that a heuristic-based binary voting model and one based on Jeffrey’s rule of conditioning [5] outperform the other models under investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barry, C.L.: Document Representations and Clues to Document Relevance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 49(14), 1293–1303 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Campbell, I., van Rijsbergen, C.J.: The ostensive model of developing information needs. In: Proceedings of the 3rd CoLIS Conference, pp. 251–268 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hamming, R.W.: Error-Detecting and Error-Correcting Codes. Bell Systems Technical Journal 29, 147–160 (1950)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Harman, D.: An Experimental Study of the Factors Important in Document Ranking. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGIR Conference, pp. 186–193 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jeffrey, R.C.: The Logic of Decision, 2nd edn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lam, W., Mukhopadhyay, S., Mostafa, J., Palakal, M.: Detection of Shifts in User Interests for Personalised Information Filtering. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGIR Conference, pp. 317–325 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mitchell, T.M.: Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill, New York (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Robertson, S.E.: On term selection for query expansion. Journal of Documentation 46(4), 359–364 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ruthven, I.: Re-examining the Potential Effectiveness of Interactive Query Expansion. In: Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGIR Conference, pp. 213–220 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Salton, G. (ed.): The SMART Retrieval System. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Salton, G., Buckley, C.: Improving retrieval performance by relevance feedback. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 41(4), 288–297 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. van Rijsbergen, C.J.: Probabilistic Retrieval Revisited. The Computer Journal 35(3), 291–298 (1992)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Voorhees, E.H., Harman, D.: Overview of the sixth text retrieval conference (TREC-6). Information Processing and Management 36(1), 3–35 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. White, R.W., Jose, J.M., Ruthven, I.: The use of implicit evidence for relevance feedback in Web retrieval. In: Crestani, F., Girolami, M., van Rijsbergen, C.J.K. (eds.) ECIR 2002. LNCS, vol. 2291, pp. 93–109. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. White, R.W., Jose, J.M., Ruthven, I.: A task-oriented study on the influencing effects of query-biased summarisation in web searching. Information Processing and Management 39(5), 707–733 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. White, R.W., Jose, J.M., Ruthven, I.: An Approach for Implicitly Detecting Information Needs. In: Proceedings of 12th CIKM Conference, pp. 504–508 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

White, R.W., Jose, J.M., van Rijsbergen, C.J., Ruthven, I. (2004). A Simulated Study of Implicit Feedback Models. In: McDonald, S., Tait, J. (eds) Advances in Information Retrieval. ECIR 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2997. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24752-4_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24752-4_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-21382-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24752-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics