Skip to main content

Does Accounting Account for Knowledge?

  • Chapter
Handbook on Knowledge Management 1

Part of the book series: International Handbooks on Information Systems ((INFOSYS,volume 1))

Abstract

How can organizations best account for knowledge management? In this chapter, we explore two dimensions of this problem: (1) determinants of the value of accounting information and the economic and institutional forces that shape existing knowledge accounting (KA) efforts, and (2) a discussion of six proposed alternative methods of knowledge accounting. We conclude by arguing that KA is problematic due to the economic characteristics of knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), “Improving Business Reporting–A Customer Focus (the Jenkins Report),” February 21, 2000, URL=http://www.aicpa.org/members/div/accstd/iber/appiv.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, “Improving Business Reporting–A Customer Focus,” 1994,

    Google Scholar 

  • URL=http://accounting.rutgers.edu/raw/aicpa/business/chap1.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur Andersen and Co., The Valuation of Intangible Assets. London: The Economist Intelligence Unit, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, G. P., M. C. Jensen, and K. J. Murphy, “Compensation and Incentives: Practice vs. Theory,” The Journal of Finance, 43, 3, 1988, 593 - 616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth, M. E., R. Kasnik, and M. F. McNichols, “Analyst Coverage and Intangible Assets,” Stanford University Research Paper, No. 1575R3, August, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, G., C.Ittner, D. Larcher, J. Low, T.Siesfeld, and M.S. Malone, “Introducing the New Value Creation Index,” Forbes ASAP, April 4, 2000. URL=http://www.forbes.com/asap/2000/0403/140.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, M. M. and S.M.H. Wallman, Unseen Wealth: Report of the Brookings task Force on Understanding Intangible Sources of Value. Washington: Brookings Institution, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. and S. Perry, “Removing the Financial Performance Halo from Fortune’s Most Admired Companies,” Academy of Management Journal, 37, 5, 1994, 1347 - 1359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.S. and P. Duguid, “Organizing Knowledge,” California Management Review, 40, 3, 1998, 90 - 111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, L., “Value-Relevance of Capitalizing Successful Exploration Activities: Implications for RandD Accounting,” Working Paper, Ohio State University, October, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson, E., and L. Hitt, “Breaking Boundaries,” Information Week, Special Issue, September 22, 1997, 34 - 36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants, Total Value Creation®, 2000, URL=http://www.totalvaluecreation.com/index.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Canadian Performance Reporting Initiative, Intellectual Capital Management: Challenge and Response, URL=http://cpri.matrixlinks.ca/icm/IcmReport.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cash, J. I., W.F. McFarlan, J.L. McKenney, and L.M. Applegate, Corporate Information Systems Management. Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, K., V. Richardson, and R. Zmud, “Examining the Shareholder Wealth Effects of Announcements of Newly Created CIO Positions,” MIS Quarterly, 25, 1, 2001, 43 - 70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clemons, E.K., “Corporate Strategies for Information Technology: A Resource-Based Approach,” Computer, 24, 11, 1991, 131 - 136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danish Trade and Industry Development Council., Intellectual Capital Accounts–Reporting and Managing Intellectual Capital, Copenhagen, September, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desjardins, J., The Measurement of Shareholder Value Creation, Toronto: Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dopuch, N., R. Holthausen, and R. Leftwich, “Abnormal Stock Returns Associated with Media Disclosures of ‘Subject To’ Qualified Audit Opinions,” Journal of Accounting and Economics 8, 1986, 93 - 119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dos Santos, B. L., G. K. Peffers, and D.C. Mauer, “The Impact of Information Investment Announcements on the Market Value of the Firm,” Information Systems Research, 4, 1, 1993, 1 - 23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, R. G., and H. D. Kahn, Pursuing Value: The Information Reporting Gap in the U.S. Capital Markets, New York: PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edvinsson, L. and M. S. Malone, Intellectual Capital: Realizing Your Company’s True Value by Finding Its Hidden Brainpowe,. New York: HarperBusiness, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, M. M., B. W. Mayhew, et al., “Why Do Audits Fail? Evidence for Lincoln Savings and Loan,” Journal of Accounting Research, 38, 1, 2000, 165 - 194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst and Young Center for Business Innovation, Enterprise Value in the Knowledge Economy. Boston, MA: Ernst and Young Center for Business Innovation, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Financial Accounting Standards Board, “Objectives of Financial Reporting by Business Enterprises,” Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 1. Stamford, CT: FASB, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Financial Accounting Standards Board, “Qualitative Characteristics of Accounting Information,” Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 2. Stamford, CT: FASB, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Financial Accounting Standards Board, “Elements of Financial Statements,” State- ment of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 6. Stamford, CT: FASB, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R.M., “Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Academy of Management Executive, 17, 1996, 109 - 122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R., “The Strategic Analysis of Intangible Resources,” The Strategic Management Journal, 13, 1992, 135 - 144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M., N. Norhria, and T. Tierney, “What’s Your Strategy for Knowledge Management?” Harvard Business Review, March-April, 1999, 106 - 116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ives, B., S.L. Jarvenpaa, and R. O. Mason, “Global Business Drivers: Aligning Information Technology to Global Business Strategy,” IBM Systems Journal, 32, 1, 1993, 143 - 162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R.S. and D.P. Norton, The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R.S. and D.P. Norton, “The Balanced Scorecard–Measures that Drive Performance,” Harvard Business Review, January-February, 1992, 71 - 79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R.S. and D.P. Norton,”Having Trouble With Your Strategy? Then Map It,” Harvard Business Review, September-October, 2000, 3 - 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen, P. G. W., Shaping the Future: Business Design Through Information Technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knivsfla, K.H. and N.E. Joachim Høegh-Krhon, “Accounting for Intangible Assets in Scandinavia, the UK, the US, and by the IASC: Challenges and a Solution,” The International Journal of Accounting, 35, 2, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knivsfla, K.H., Accounting for Intangible Assets: The Informational Relevance of Deferred Charges, Working Paper, Foundation for Research in Economics and Business Administration, December, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konrad Group, The Invisible Balance Sheet. Stockholm: Arbetsgruppen Konrad (Orginal published in Swedish asn Den Osynliga Balansräkningen ), 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leadbeater, C., New Measures for the New Economy. London: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, March, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lev, B. and D. Aboody, “Information Asymmetry, RandD, and Insider Gains,” The Journal of Finance, December, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lev, B. and P. Zarowin, The Boundaries of Financial Reporting and How to Extend Them. Working Paper, Stern School, New York University, February, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lev, B., Intangibles: Management, Measurement, and Reporting. Washington: Brookings Institution, June, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebowitz, J. and C. Y. Sven, “Developing Knowledge Management Metrics for Measuring Intellectual Capital,” Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1, 1, 2000, 54 - 67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litan, R.E. and P. Wallison, The GAAP Gap: Corporate Disclosure in the Internet Age. Washington: AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, H.C., “The Business Value of Information Technology: A Perspective and Thoughts for Future Research,” in Banker R.; Kauffmann, R.; and Mahmood M.A. (eds.), Strategic Information Technology Management: Perspectives on Organizational Growth and Competitive Advantage, Harrisburg, PA: Idea Group Publishing, 1993, 375 - 403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, C., L. Prusak, and D. Shpilberg, “Financial Risk and the Need for Superior Knowledge Management,” California Management Review, 38, 3, 1996, 77 - 101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenney, J. L., Waves of Change: Business Evolution Through Information Technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean, R.I.G., Performance Measures in the New Economy. Toronto: Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melumad, N. D. and A. Ziv, “A Theoretical Examination of the Market Reaction to Auditors’ Qualifications,” Journal of Accounting Research, Autumn, 1997, 239 - 256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, H., “Accounting for the Future: A Disciplined Approach to Value-Added Accounting,” 2000,

    Google Scholar 

  • URL=http://home. sprintmail.com/humphreynash/Draft_Proposal.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netherlands Ministry of Economic Affairs, Intangible Assets, Balancing Accounts with Knowledge, The Hague: Ministry of Economic Affairs, October, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, R. Note on Estimating the Value of the IT Asset. Harvard Business School Note 9-195-197, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. and N. Konno, “The Concept of ‘Ba’: Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation,” California Management Review, 40, 3, 1998, 40 - 54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. and Tekeuchi, H., The Knowledge-Creating Company, New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., “A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation,” Organization Science, 5, 1994, 14 - 37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, D.P. “Should Balanced Scorecards Be Required?” Balanced Scorecard Report, July-August, 2000, 14 - 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, K, K., “What We Know About the Strategic Management of Technology,” California Management Review, Spring. 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrash, G., “Intellectual Asset Management at Dow Chemical,” in Sullivan, P.H. (ed.), Profiting from Intellectual Capital: Extracting Value From Innovation, New York: Wiley, 1998, 205 - 220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Psychic Investor, 2001, URL=http://www.marcusgoodwin.com/, see also M. Goodwin, The Psychic Investor, 2000, Adams Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • RR Donnelley and Sons, Regulation FD, 2001, URL=http://www.realcorporatelawyer. com/regulationFD.html whatis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackmann, S.A., E. Flamholtz, and M. Bullen, “Human Resource Accounting: A State-Of-The-Art Review,” Journal of Accounting Literature, 8, 1989, 235 - 264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sambamurthy, V. and R.W. Zmud, “At the Heart of Success: Organizationwide Management Competencies,” in Sauer, C. and Yetton, P.W. (eds.) Steps to the Future: Fresh Thinking on the Management of IT-Based Organizational Transformation, San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass, 1997, 143 - 163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saylor, M., “MicroStrategy Falls on Earnings Cut,” Bloomberg News, 2000, URL=http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1007-200-1577065.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D.R., Theory of Accounts. New York: Henry Holt Co., 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson’s Contemporary Quotations, compiled by James B. Simpson. 1988, http://www.bartleby.com/63/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skandia AFS., Human Capital in Transformation, Intellectual Capital Prototype Report. 1998 URL=http://wwwl.skanida-afs.com/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey, R.K. and S. Storey, The Framework of Financial Accounting Standards and Concepts, Norwalk, Conn.: FASB, January, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strassman, P.A., The Squandered Computer, New Haven, CT: Information Economics Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strassman, P.A. The Business Value of Computer. New Haven, CT: The Information Economics Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sveiby, K., “The Intangible Assets Monitor,” 1997, URL=http://www.sveiby.com.au/intangass/companymonitor.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sveiby, K., The Intangible Assets Monitor. 1999a, URL=http://www.sveiby.com.au/IntangAss/CompayMonitor.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sveiby, K., “The Balanced Score Card (BSC) and the Intangible Assets Monitor,” 1999b, URL=http://www.sveiby.com.au/BSCandIAM.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D.K., “Capturing Value from Technological Innovation: Integration, Strategic Partnering and Licensing Decisions,” in Tushman, M. and Anderson, P. (eds.) Managing Strategic Innovation and Change, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986, 287 - 308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upton, W.S., Special Report: Business and Financial Reporting, Challenges from the New Economy. Norwalk CT: FASB, April, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterhouse, John, and A. Svendsen, Strategic Performance Monitoring and Management: Using Non-Financial Measures to Improve Corporate Governance. Toronto: Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stone, D.N., Warsono, S. (2004). Does Accounting Account for Knowledge?. In: Holsapple, C.W. (eds) Handbook on Knowledge Management 1. International Handbooks on Information Systems, vol 1. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24746-3_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24746-3_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20005-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24746-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics