Abstract
This research is intended to develop the empirical relationship between defects and their causes to estimate. Also, using defect cause, we understand associated relation between defects and design defect trigger. So when we archive resemblant project, we can forecast defect and prepare to solve defect by using defect trigger.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Lee, K.-W.: Modelling for HDC. In: The 5th Korean Conference on Software Engineering, Korea information science society, February 20 (2003)
Annual Research Review, USC/CSE workshop reports, (october 2002)
Boehm, B.W.: Software Cost Estimaition With Cocomo II. Prentice- Hall PTR, Upper saddle river (2000)
Software Process Improvement Forum. KASPA SPI-7, (December 2002)
Eckes, G.: The Six Sigma Revolution. John Willey & Sons, England (2001)
SPICE Assessment in korea. The korea SPICE, May 13 (2002)
Shin, K.-A.: Research about software reliability development model that defect importance is considered. Journal of the korea computer industry education society 03(07), 837–844 (2000)
Dunn, R.H.: Software defect removal. McGraw-Hill, New York (1984)
Chillarrege, R., Prasad, K.R.: Test and Development Process Retrospective? a Case study using ODC Triggers. IEEE computer Society, Los Alamitos (April 2002)
Fenton, N., Ohlsson, N.: Quantitative analysis_of faults and failures in a complex software system. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 26, 797–814 (2000)
McCall, J.A., Richards, P.K., Walters, G.F.: Factors in software qualityVol 1, 2 and 3. Springfield VA., NTIS, AD/A-049-014/015/055 (1997)
Vouk, M.A.: Software Reliability_Engineering. In: Tutorial Notes? Topics in Relia bility_ & Maintainability & Statistics, 2000 Annual_ Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, Los Angeles, CA, January 24-27 (2000)
Padberg, W.: A Fast Algorithm to Component_ Maximum Likelihood Estimates for the Hypergeometric Software Reliability Model. In: Asia-Pacific Conference on Quality Software APAQS, vol. 2, pp. 40–49 (2001)
Vamder Wiel, S.A., Votta, L.G.: Assessing Software Designs Using Capture-Recapture Methods .IEEE Transaction on Software Engineering 1045-1054 (1993)
Wohlin, C., Runeson, P.: Defect Content Estimations from Review Data. In: Proceedings International Conference on Software Engineering ICSE, pp. 400-409 (1998)
Gaffney, J.: Some Models for Software Defect Analysis. In: Lockheed Martin (November 1996)
Hatton, L.: Is Modularization Always Good Idea. Information and Software Technology 38, 719–721 (1996)
Compton, B., withrow, C.: Prediction and Control of Ada Software Defects. J. System sand Software 12, 199–207 (1990)
Fenton, N., Neil, M.: Software Metrics: Successes, Failures, and New Directions. J. Systems and Software 47, 149–157 (1999)
Pressman, R.S.: Software Engineering. International edition. Mcgraw-Hill, New York (1997)
Kasse, T.: Actin Focused Assessment for Software Process Improvement. Artech House, Norwood (2002)
Basili, V., Caldiera, G., Rombach, D.: The Experience Factory. In: Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, Wiley, Chichester (1994)
Basili, V., Caldiera, G., Rombach, D.: The Goal Question Metric Approach. In: Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, Wiley, Chichester (1994)
Basili, V.R.: The Experience Factory and its Relationship to Other Improvement Paradigms. In: Sommerville, I., Paul, M. (eds.) ESEC 1993. LNCS, vol. 717, Springer, Heidelberg (1993)
ANSI/IEEE Std 610.12-1990, IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology (February 1991)
Paulk, M.C., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M.B., Weber, C.V.. Capability Maturity Model for Software, Version 1.1 (CMU/SEI-93-TR-24, ADA263403).: Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, PA Carnegie Mellon University (February 1993)
Osterweil, L.J.: Software Processes are Software Too. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Software Engineering, Monterey, CA, March 30 - April 2, pp. 2–13. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (1987)
SPICE Baseline Practices Guide (BPG) Version 1.00 (SPICE Project ISO/IECITC1/SC7/WG10). Internal draft, limited distribution (September 1994); defines the goals and fundamental activities that are essential to software engineering, structured according to increasing levels of process capability
Herbsleb, J., Carleton, A., Rozum, J., Seigel, J., Zubrow, D.: Benefits of CMM-Based Software Process (CMU/SEI-94-TR-13). Software Engineering Institute/Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh/PA (1994)
Britz, T., Cameron, P.: Partially ordered sets. J. of Formalized Mathematics, Inst. of computer science, Univ. of Bialystok 1 (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lee, E., Lee, K.W., Lee, K. (2004). Design Defect Trigger for Software Process Improvement. In: Ramamoorthy, C.V., Lee, R., Lee, K.W. (eds) Software Engineering Research and Applications. SERA 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3026. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24675-6_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24675-6_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-21975-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24675-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive