Model-Based Project Process Analysis Using Project Tracking Data

  • Kyung-A Yoon
  • Sang-Yoon Min
  • Doo-Hwan Bae
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3026)


In software process improvement, accumulating and analyzing the historical data from past projects are essential work. However, setting up the systematic and logical measurement and analysis program is very difficult. Many mature organizations have their own measurement program for the process improvement. However, most of them are based on the statistical metrics-driven approach that consequently limits logical reasoning on the detailed analysis on the process. In this paper, we propose a process analysis approach called MPAF(Model-based Process Analysis Framework), based on formal process modeling. In MPAF, the corresponding formal process instance model is recovered through data gathering from a project execution. Various formal analysis can be performed on the recovered and reconstructed process instance model for diagnosing the vitality of the project. We also performed experimental case study by applying MPAF to real world industry projects.


Project Plan Activity Node Agent Conflict Target Project Improve Software Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Pressman, R.S.: Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Min, S.Y., Lee, H.D., Bae, D.H.: SoftPM: a software process management system reconcileing formalism with easiness. Information and Software Technology, 1–16 (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lee, H.D.: Generating Multiple Prerspective from an Integrated Activity-centered Process Model. M.S. thesis (December 1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Paulk, M.C., et al.: The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1995)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jalote, P.: CMM in Practice: Processes for Executing Software Projects at Infosys. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Florac, W.A., Carleton, A.D.: Measuring the Software Process: Statistical Process Control for Software Process Improvement. Addison Wesley, Reading (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ambler, S.W.: Process Patterns: Building Large-Scale Systems Using Object Technology, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Klosch, R.R.: Reverse Engineering: Why and How to Reverse Engineer Software. In: Proceedings of the California Software Symposium (CSS 1996), April 1996, pp. 92–99 (1996)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cook, J.E., Wolf, A.L.: Discovering Models of Software Processes from Event-Based Data. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 7(3), 215–249 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cugola, G., Di Nitto, E., Ghezzi, C., Mantione, M.: How to Deal with Deviations During Process Model Enactment. In: Proceedings of 17th International Conference Software Engineering, Seattle, Washington, pp. 265–273 (1995)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cook, J.E., Wolf, A.L.: Software Process Validation: Quantitatively Measuring the Correspondence of a Process to a Model. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 8(2), 147–176 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kyung-A Yoon
    • 1
  • Sang-Yoon Min
    • 1
  • Doo-Hwan Bae
    • 1
  1. 1.Software Process Improvement Center, Department of Computer ScienceKorea Advanced Institute of Science and TechnologyTaejonSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations