Skip to main content

A Multi-criteria Protocol for Multi-agent Negotiations

  • Conference paper
Methods and Applications of Artificial Intelligence (SETN 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3025))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Negotiation processes are often characterized by conflicts of interests of the negotiating parts. However, it is possible to mitigate these conflicts, if we support the negotiation process with a well-structured model. This area of interest has large occupied the scientists of Group Decision Support Systems (GDSS) and particularly those who focus on the Negotiation Support Systems (NSS). In this paper, we propose an experimental multi-criteria prototype negotiation protocol which allows agents to follow a process, in order to end up with an optimal decision. The proposed model is able to estimate agents’ preferences and suggest a convenient solution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anson, A., Jelassi, M.T.: A developmental framework for computer-supported conflict resolution. European Journal of Operational Research 46(2), 181–199 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rangaswamy, A., Shell, G.R.: Using computers to realize joint gains in negotiations: toward an electronic bargaining table. Management Science 43(8), 1147–1163 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Espinasse, B., Picolet, G., Chouraqui, E.: Negotiation Support Systems: A multi-criteria and multi-agent approach. European Journal of Operational Research 103, 389–409 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Roy, B.: Méthodologie Multicritère d’Aide a la Decision, Economica, Paris (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Corkill, D.D., Lesser, V.R.: The use of meta-level control for coordination in a distributed problem solving network. In: Proc. 8th Int. Jt. Conf. Artif. Intell, Karlsruhe, Germany, pp. 784–756 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pruit, D.G.: Negotiation Behaviour. Academic Press, London (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zeng, D., Sycara, K.: How can an agent learn to negotiate. In: Mueller, J., Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N. (eds.) ECAI-WS 1996 and ATAL 1996. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1193, pp. 233–244. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Despotis, D.K., Yannacopoulos, D., Zopounidis, C.: A review of the UTA multicriteria method and some improvements, Decision Support Systems Laboratory, working paper 90-04 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Carmel, E., Herniter, B., Nunamaker Jr., J.F.: Labor management contract negotiations in an electronic meeting room: a case study. Group Decision and Negotiation 2(1), 27–60 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kersten, G., Michalowski, W., Szpakowicz, S., Koperzac, Z.: Restructurable representations of negotiation. Management Science 37(10), 1269–1290 (1991)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang, H., Liao, S., Liao, L.: Modeling constraint based negotiating agents. Decision Support Systems 33, 201–217 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lim, J.: A conceptual framework on the adoption of negotiation support systems. Information and Software Technology 45, 469–477 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jacquet-Lagrèze, E., Siskos, J.: Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision making: The UTA method. European Journal of Operational Research (10), 151–164 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jennings, N.R., Sycara, K., Wooldridge, M.: A Roadmap of Agent Research and Development. Int Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 1(1), 7–38 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Brans, J.-P., Mareschal, B., Vincke, P.: PROMETHEE: A new family of outranking methods in multi-criteria analysis. In: Brans, J.-P. (ed.) Operational Research 1984, North- Holand, pp. 408–421 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sycara, K.: Problem restructuring in negotiation. Management Science 37(10), 1248–1268 (1991)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Busch, L.A., Horstmann, I.J.: The game of negotiations: ordering issues and implementing agreements. Games and Economic Behavior 41, 169–191 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Faratin, P., Sierra, C., Jennings, N.R.: Negotiation Decision Functions for Autonomous Agents. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam (1997) (preprint and submitted)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Siskos, Y.: Comment modéliser les préférences au moyen de functions d’utilité additives. RAIRO Recherche opérationnelle 14, 53–82 (1980)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Matsatsinis, N.F., Delias, P. (2004). A Multi-criteria Protocol for Multi-agent Negotiations. In: Vouros, G.A., Panayiotopoulos, T. (eds) Methods and Applications of Artificial Intelligence. SETN 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3025. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24674-9_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24674-9_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-21937-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24674-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics