Skip to main content

Social Control Mechanisms to Coordinate an Unreliable Agent Society

  • Conference paper
Coordination Models and Languages (COORDINATION 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2949))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 176 Accesses

Abstract

In multiagent systems a common problem is how to assign tasks to other agents. It is very desirable to be able to guarantee the error rate of a solution in a multiagent system’s society. In this paper, a novel approach for this problem has been introduced by devising social control mechanisms, analyzing their mathematical models and simulating and comparing them. It is also shown that the open multiagent society is modeled and coordinated in this way and is able to achieve any desired and predetermined threshold of correctness for the final solution, regardless of the performance of selfish and unreliable agents in the society or any stipulation about their honesty. This is extremely critical and problematic in the design of coordinated multiagent societies, today.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agent 2003 Conference on Challenges in Social Simulation, Chicago, IL, USA, October 3-4 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fourth International Workshop on Engineering Societies in the Agents World, Imperial College, London, UK, October 29-31 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jennings, N.R.: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~nrj/mobilevce.html

  4. Lynch, N.A.: Distributed Algorithms. Morgan Kauffman Publishers, Inc., San Francisco (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M., Green, J.R.: Microeconomic Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Moses, Y., Tenenholtz, M.: On Computational Aspects of Artificial Social Systems. In: Proc. 11th DAI Workshop, Glen Arbor, MI, USA (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nair, R., Ito, T., Tambe, M., Marsella, S.: Task Allocation in the RoboCup Rescue Simulation Domain: A Short Note. In: Birk, A., Coradeschi, S., Tadokoro, S. (eds.) RoboCup 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2377, p. 751. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Overeinder, B., Brazier, F., Marin, O.: Fault Tolerance in Scalable Agent Support Systems: Integrating DARX in the AgentScape Framework. In: 3rd International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid, Tokyo, Japan, May 12-15 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ramamohanarao, K., Bailey, J.: Transaction Oriented Computational Models for Multi-Agent Systems. In: 13th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI 2001), Dallas, Texas, USA, November 07-09 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sandholm, T.W.: Negotiation among Self-Interested Computationally Limited Agents. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, (1996), http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~sandholm/dissetation.ps

  11. Sarmenta, L.F.G.: Volunteer Computing. Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, MIT, Cambridge (December 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shahri, H.H.: Assurance of Solution Correctness in Task Allocation without Stipulation in an Agent Society. In: Proceedings of the Agent 2003 Conference on Challenges in Social Simulation, Chicago, IL, USA (October 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shehory, O., Kraus, S.: Task Allocation via Coalition Formation among Autonomous Agents. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 1995), Montreal, Quebec, Canada (August 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sparkman, C.H., De Loach, S.A., Self, A.L.: Automated Derivation of Complex Agent Architectures from Analysis Specifications. In: Wooldridge, M.J., Weiß, G., Ciancarini, P. (eds.) AOSE 2001. LNCS, vol. 2222, p. 278. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Wallace, S.: Validating Agent Behavior. In: 23rd Soar Workshop, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, June 23-27 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Winoto, P.: A Multi-Agent Based Simulation of the Market for Offenses. In: AAAI 2002 Workshop on Multi-Agent Modeling and Simulation of Economic Systems (MAMSES 2002), Edmonton, Canada, July 29 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zuev, Y.A.: The Estimation of Efficiency of Voting Procedures. Theory of Probability and its Applications 42(1) (March 1997), http://www.siam.org/journals/tvp/42-1/97594.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Shahri, H.H., Meybodi, M.R. (2004). Social Control Mechanisms to Coordinate an Unreliable Agent Society. In: De Nicola, R., Ferrari, GL., Meredith, G. (eds) Coordination Models and Languages. COORDINATION 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2949. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24634-3_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24634-3_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-21044-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24634-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics