Skip to main content

The Impact of Conversational Navigational Guides on the Learning, Use, and Perceptions of Users of a Web Site

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2926))

Abstract

Knowledge management systems will presumably benefit from intelligent interfaces, including those with animated conversational agents. One of the functions of an animated conversational agent is to serve as a navigational guide that nudges the user how to use the interface in a productive way. This is a different function from delivering the content of the material. We conducted a study on college students who used a web facility in one of four navigational guide conditions: Full Guide (speech and face), Voice Guide, Print Guide, and No Guide. The web site was the Human Use Regulatory Affairs Advisor (HURAA), a web-based facility that provides help and training on research ethics, based on documents and regulations in United States Federal agencies. The college students used HURAA to complete a number of learning modules and document retrieval tasks. There was no significant facilitation of any of the guides on several measures of learning and performance, compared with the No Guide condition. This result suggests that the potential benefits of conversational guides are not ubiquitous, but they may save time and increase learning under specific conditions that are yet to be isolated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ashley, K.D.: Modeling legal argument: Reasoning with cases and hypotheticals. MIT Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Atkinson, R.K.: Optimizing learning from examples using animated pedagogical agents. Journal of Educational Psychology 94, 416–427 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baylor, A.L.: Investigating multiple pedagogical perspectives through MIMIC (Multiple Intelligent Mentors Instructing Collaboratively). In: Workshop on agents at the AI-ED International Conference, San Antonio, TX (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cassell, J.: Embodied conversational agents: Representation and intelligence in user interfaces. AI Magazine 22, 67–83 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Collins, A., Neville, P., Bielaczyc, K.: The role of different media in designing learning environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 11, 144–162 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. 32 CFR 219, Protection of Human Subjects, Department of Defense (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  7. DoD Directive 3216.2, Protection of Human Subjects in DoD supported research, Department of efense (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Emmanuel, E.J., Wendler, D., Grady, C.: What makes clinical research ethical? Journal of the merican Medical Association 283, 2701–2711 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Graesser, A.C., Hu, X., Person, N.K., Stewart, C., Toth, J., Jackson, G.T., Susarla, S., Ventura, M.: Learning about the ethical treatment of human subjects in experiments on a web facility with a conversational agent and ITS components. In: Cerri, S.A., Gouardéres, G., Paraguaçu, F. (eds.) ITS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2363, pp. 972–981. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Graesser, A.C., Langston, M.C., Baggett, W.B.: Exploring information about concepts by asking questions. In: Nakamura, G.V., Taraban, R.M., Medin, D. (eds.) The psychology of learning and motivation. Categorization by humans and machines, vol. 29, pp. 411–436. Academic Press, Orlando (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Graesser, A.C., Person, N., Harter, D., TRG: Teaching tactics and dialog in AutoTutor. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 12, 257–279 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Graesser, A.C., VanLehn, K., Rose, C., Jordan, P., Harter, D.: Intelligent tutoring systems with conversational dialogue. AI Magazine 22, 39–51 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Graesser, A.C., Wiemer-Hastings, P., Wiemer-Hastings, K., Harter, D., Person, N., TRG: Using latent semantic analysis to evaluate the contributions of students in AutoTutor. Interactive Learning Environments 8, 129–148 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Johnson, W.L., Rickel, J.W., Lester, J.C.: Animated pedagogical agents: Face-to-face interaction in interactive learning environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 11, 47–78 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kolodner, J.: Retrieval and organizational strategies in conceptual memory: A computer model. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Landauer, T.K., Foltz, P.W., Laham, D.: An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes 25, 259–284 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mayer, R.E.: Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist 32, 1–19 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Moreno, K.N., Klettke, B., Nibbaragandla, K., Graesser, A.C., The Tutoring Research Group: Perceived characteristics and pedagogical efficacy of animated conversational agents. In: Cerri, S.A., Gouarderes, G., Paraguacu, F. (eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems 2002, pp. 963–971. Springer, Berlin (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Moreno, R., Mayer, R.E., Spires, H.A., Lester, J.C.: The case for social agency in computer-based teaching: Do students learn more deeply when the interact with animated pedagogical agents? Cognition & Instruction 19, 177–213 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. NIH 45 CFR 46, National Institutes of Health Code of Federal Regulations, Protection of Human Subjects (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Person, N.K., Graesser, A.C., Bautista, L., Mathews, E., TRG: Evaluating student learning gains in two versions of AutoTutor. In: Moore, J.D., Redfield, C.L., Johnson, W.L. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education: AI-ED in the Wired and Wireless Future, pp. 286–293. OIS Press, Amsterdam (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sharable Content Object Reference Model (SCORM), Versions 1.1 and 1.2., http://www.adlnet.org

  23. Whittaker, S.: Theories and methods in mediated communication. In: Graesser, A.C., Gernsbacher, M.A., Goldman, S.R. (eds.) Handbook of discourse processes, Erlbaum, Mahwah (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Graesser, A., Jackson, G.T., Ventura, M., Mueller, J., Hu, X., Person, N. (2004). The Impact of Conversational Navigational Guides on the Learning, Use, and Perceptions of Users of a Web Site. In: van Elst, L., Dignum, V., Abecker, A. (eds) Agent-Mediated Knowledge Management. AMKM 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2926. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24612-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24612-1_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20868-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24612-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics