Skip to main content

An Exploration in Using Cognitive Coherence Theory to Automate BDI Agents’ Communicational Behavior

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2922))

Abstract

The cognitive coherence theory for agent communication pragmatics allows modelling a great number of agent communication aspects while being computational. This paper describes our exploration in applying the cognitive coherence pragmatics theory for BDI agents communication. The presented practical framework rely on our dialogue games based agent communication language (DIAGAL) and our dialogue game simulator toolbox (DGS). It provides the necessary theoretical and practical elements for implementing the theory as a new layer over classical BDI agents. In doing so, it brought a general scheme for automatizing agents’ communicational behavior. Finally, we give an example of the resulting system execution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bratman, M.E.: What is intention? In: Cohen, P.R., Morgan, J.L., Pollack, M.E. (eds.) Intentions in Communication, pp. 15–32. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brehm, J., Cohen, A.: Explorations in Cognitive Dissonance. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester (1962)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Chaib-draa, B., Maudet, N., Labrie, M.A.: DIAGAL, a tool for analysing and modelling commitment-based dialogues between agents. In: Proceedings of Canadian AI 2003 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dastani, M., Hulstijn, J., der Torre, L.V.: Negotiation protocols and dialogue games. In: Proceedings of the BNAIC (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dignum, F., Greaves, M. (eds.): Issues in Agent Communication. LNCS, vol. 1916. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Festinger, L.: A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press, CA (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Flores, R.F., Kremer, R.C.: A formal theory for agent conversations for actions. Computational intelligence 18(2) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Howden, N., Rönnquist, R., Hodgson, A., Lucas, A.: Jack intelligent agents summary of an agent infrastructure. In: 5th International Conference on Autonomous Agents (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Maudet, N.: Modéliser les conventions des interactions langagières: la contribution des jeux de dialogue. PhD thesis, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maudet, N.: Negociating games — a research note. Journal of autonoumous agents and multi-agent systems (2002), (submitted)

    Google Scholar 

  11. McBurney, P., Parsons, S., Wooldridge, M.: Desiderata for agent argumentation protocols. In: Procceedings of the First International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agents (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pasquier, P., Chaib-draa, B.: The cognitive coherence approach for agent communication pragmatics. In: Proceedings of the second international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagents systems, AAMAS 2003, ACM Press, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pasquier, P., Chaib-draa, B.: Cohérence et conversations entre agents: vers un modèle basé sur la consonance cognitive. In: Müller, J.P., Mathieu, P. (eds.) Systèmes multi-agents et systèmes complexes, actes des JFIADSMA 2002, pp. 188–203. Hermes Science Publication, Paris (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pasquier, P., Chaib-draa, B.: Engagements, intentions et jeux de dialogue. Actes des Secondes Journées Francophones des Modèles Formels de l’Interaction (MFI 2003), Cépaduès (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rao, S., Georgeff, M.P.: An abstract architecture for rational agents. In: Rich, C., Swartout, W., Nebel, B. (eds.) Proceedings of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR&R 1992), pp. 439–449 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Reed, C.: Dialogue frames in agent communication. In: Weiss, G. (ed.) ECAI 1996 Workshops. LNCS, vol. 1221, Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Searle, J.R.: Collective intentions and actions. In: Cohen, P.R., Morgan, J., Pollack, M.E. (eds.) Intentions in Communication, pp. 401–416. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Singh, M.P.: A social semantics for agent communication language. In: [5], pp. 31–45 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sun, R.: An introduction to hybrid connectionist-symbolic models. In: Connectionist-Symbolic Integration, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Thagard, P.: Coherence in Thought and Action. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Thagard, P., Verbeurgt, K.: Coherence as constraint satisfaction. Cognitive Science 22, 1–24 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tuomela, R., Miller, K.: We-intentions. Philosophical Studies 53, 367–389 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. von Wright, G.H.: Freedom and determination. North Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Walton, D., Krabbe, E.: Commitment in dialogue. State University of New York Press (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wickland, R., Brehm, J.: Perspectives on Cognitive Dissonance. Halsted Press, NY (1976)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pasquier, P., Andrillon, N., Labrie, MA., Chaib-draa, B. (2004). An Exploration in Using Cognitive Coherence Theory to Automate BDI Agents’ Communicational Behavior. In: Dignum, F. (eds) Advances in Agent Communication. ACL 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2922. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24608-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24608-4_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20769-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24608-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics