Skip to main content

A Cooperative Dialogue Game for Resolving Ontological Discrepancies

  • Conference paper
Advances in Agent Communication (ACL 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2922))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to present a computational framework that enables us to generate elementary speech act sequences in a dialogue between an electronic assistant and a computer user. Since naive users of complex systems often do not think and communicate in terms of domain characteristics, we will concentrate on the conversational process of the understanding of the meaning of a vocabulary shared by two dialogue participants. In order to give meaning to their vocabulary, agents need to translate terms into their private domain ontologies. We consider a dialogue game in which agents produce speech acts or ‘moves’ to transfer relevant information with respect to a particular agreement about the meaning of the words in the vocabulary. Describing the properties and the dynamics of the cognitive states or cognitive constructs in relation to the various dialogue contributions is an essential part of this work. In particular, we address the following basic questions: What type of cognitive constructs should be included to model the dialogue’s basic structural properties? How do the various dialogue contributions change the existing cognitive constructs? How do these changes influence the generation of new contributions?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahn, R.M.C., Beun, R.J., Borghuis, T., Bunt, H.C., van Overveld, C.W.A.M.: The DenK architecture: A fundamental approach to user-interfaces. Artificial Intelligence Review 8, 431–445 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Airenti, G., Bara, B.G., Colombetti, M.: Failures, exploitations and deceits in communication. Journal of Pragmatics 20, 303–326 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Allen, J.F., Perrault, C.R.: Analyzing intention in utterances. Artificial Intelligence 15, 143–178 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Austin, J.L.: How to do Things with Words. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Beun, R.J.: On the generation of coherent dialogue: A computational approach. Pragmatics and Cognition 9(1), 37–68 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bunt, H.C.: Information dialogues as communicative action in relation to partner modelling and information processing. In: Taylor, et al. [18], pp. 47–73

    Google Scholar 

  7. Carlson, L.: Dialogue Games. An Approach to Discourse Analysis. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gazdar, G.: Elements of discourse understanding. In: Joshi, A.K., Webber, B.L., Sag, I.A. (eds.) Speech act assignment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Good, D.A.: The viability of conversational grammars. In: Taylor et al. [18], pp. 135–144

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grice, H.P.: Logic and conversation. In: Cole, P., Morgan, J.L. (eds.) Speech Acts, Syntax and Semantics, vol. 11, pp. 41–58. Academic Press, New York (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Grosz, B.J., Sidner, C.L.: Attention, intentions and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics 12(3), 175–204 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hamblin, C.L.: Mathematical models of dialogue. Theoria 37, 130–155 (1971)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Hutchins, E.: Metaphors for interface design. In: Taylor et al. [18], pp. 11–28

    Google Scholar 

  14. Levinson, S.C.: Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rich, C., Lesh, N., Rickel, J., Garland, G.: A plug-in architecture for generating collaborative agent responses. In: Castelfranchi, C., Lewis Johnson, W. (eds.) Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 782–789. ACM Press, New York (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Searle, J.R.: Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Taylor, J.A., Carletta, J., Mellisch, C.: Requirements for belief models in co-operative dialogue. User Modelling and User-Adapted Interaction 6, 23–68 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Taylor, M.M., Néel, F., Bouwhuis, D.G. (eds.): The structure of multimodal dialogue, Amsterdam. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam (1989)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Beun, RJ., van Eijk, R.M. (2004). A Cooperative Dialogue Game for Resolving Ontological Discrepancies. In: Dignum, F. (eds) Advances in Agent Communication. ACL 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2922. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24608-4_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24608-4_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20769-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24608-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics