Advertisement

Ökonomische und gesellschaftliche Kontextbedingungen

Chapter
  • 755 Downloads

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Kapitel geht es darum, die ökonomischen und gesellschaftlichen Kontextbedingungen des politischen Systems der Philippinen zu analysieren. In diesem Zusammenhang wird ein Blick auf die sozioökonomischen Entwicklungsverläufe des Landes, seine gesellschaftliche Diversität sowie kulturelle Normen und Ausprägungen politischer Kultur geworfen.

Literatur

  1. Abinales, Patricio N., & Amoroso, Donna J. (2005). State and Society in the Philippines. Pasig City: Anvil Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Abinales, Patricio N. (2011). The Philippines in 2010: Blood, Ballots, and Beyond. Asian Survey 51 (1), S. 163–172.Google Scholar
  3. Asian Development Bank (2014). Asian Development Outlook: Fiscal Policy for Inclusive Growth. (www.adb.org).
  4. Bamard, Alan, Good, Anthony (1984). Research Practices in the study of kinship. London and Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bellwood, P. (2004) “The Origins and Dispersals of Agricultural Communities in Southeast Asia” in P. Bellwood, I. Glover (Hrsg.) Southeast Asia: From Prehistory to History, S. 21–40, London: Routledge CurzonGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolongaita, Emil R., Jr (2000). The Philippines in 1999: Balancing Restive Democracy and Recovering Economy. Asian Survey 40 (1), S. 67–77.Google Scholar
  7. Chin, J. (2015). “A Decade later. The Lasting Shadow of Mahathir”, in: Chin J. and Dosch J. (Hrsg.). Malaysia Post-Mahathir: A Decade of Change?, (S. 16–40), Singapore: Marshall Cavendish Editions.Google Scholar
  8. Eisenstadt, S.N., & Lemarchand, Rene (1981). The Study of Patron-Client Relations and Recent Developments in Sociological Theory. In: S.N. Eisenstadt & Rene Lemarchand (Hrsg.), Political Clientelism, Patronage and Development (S. 271–296). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Elter, Georg. (1999). Ethnie. In: Christian Feest, Hans Fischer, Thomas Schweizer (Hrsg.). Lexikon der Völkerkunde. S. 99–100. Stuttgart: Dietrich Reimer Verlag.Google Scholar
  10. Ferdinand, Peter (2012). Governance in Pacific Asia: political economy and development from Japan to Burma. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  11. Germany Trade and Invest (2014). Philippinen zogen 2013 mehr ausländische Investitionen an. (www.gtai.de).
  12. Hill, Hall, & Piza, Sharon Faye (2007). The Philippine Development Record. A Comparative Assessment. In: Rodolfo C. Severino & Lorraine Carlos Salazar (Hrsg.), Whither the Philippines in the 21 st century? (S. 246–276). Singapore: ISEAS Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
  13. Hunt, Chester L. (1993). The Society and its Environment, in: Ronald E. Dolan (Hrsg.). Philippines. A Country Study (S. 65–116). Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress.Google Scholar
  14. Kimura, Masataka (1995). Rise and Fall of Bandila. A Study of a Middle Force Alliance and the Urban Middle Class in Philippine Politics. Pilipinas 24, S. 1–31.Google Scholar
  15. Labrador, Mel C. (2001), The Philippines in 2000. In Search of a Silver Lining, in Asian Survey, Vol. 41, No. 1, S. 221–229.Google Scholar
  16. Levy, S. M. (1996). Build – Operate – Transfer. Paving the way for tomorrows’ infrastructure. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  17. Loewen, Howard (2005). Der Friedensprozess im Süden der Philippinen zwischen Terrorismus und Separatismus. Südostasien aktuell: journal of current Southeast Asian affairs 3, S. 3–6.Google Scholar
  18. Loewen, Howard (2007). Wahlen auf den Philippinen: Viel Kontinuität, etwas Wandel und eine geschwächte Präsidentin. GIGA Focus Dokument 7. https://www.giga-hamburg.de/de/system/files/publications/gf_asien_0707.pdf. Zugegriffen: 02. August 2016.
  19. Magno, Francisco Alimon (1989). State, Patronage and Local Elites. Kasarinlan. A Philippine Quarterly of Third World Studies 4:3. S. 10–18.Google Scholar
  20. Mauss, Marcel (1990). Die Gabe. Form und Funktion des Austauschs in archaischen Gesellschaften. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  21. New York Times vom 27.03.2013. Philippines gets Investment-Grade Credit Rating.Google Scholar
  22. Mulder, Niels (1992). Inside Southeast Asia. Thai, Javanese and Filipino interpretations of everyday life. Bangkok: Editions Duang Kamol.Google Scholar
  23. World Bank (1999). From Crisis to Opportunity. Washington D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
  24. Oppenheimer, Stephen (1998). Eden in the East: The Drowned Continent of Southeast Asia. London: Orion.Google Scholar
  25. Pinches, M. (1992), “The Philippines: The Regional Exception”, The Pacific Review, 5, 4, S. 390–401.Google Scholar
  26. Ricklefs, M.C. (Hrsg.). (2010). A New History of Southeast Asia. Houndmills Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  27. Riedinger, Jeffrey (1995). Agrarian Reform in the Philippines. Democratic Transitions and Redistributive Reforms. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Rivera, Timero C. (1994). The State Civil Society and Foreign Actors. The Politics of Philippine Industrialization. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 16 (2), S. 157–177.Google Scholar
  29. Sicat, Gerado P. (2007). Macroeconomic Issues and Challenges. In: Rodolfo C. Severino & Lorraine Carlos Salazar (Hrsg.), Whither the Philippines in the 21 st century? (S. 142–179). Singapore: ISEAS Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
  30. Scott, James C. (1977). Patron-Client Politics and Political Change in Southeast Asia. In: James C. Scott (Hrsg.), Friends, Followers and Factions. A Reader in Political Clientelism (S. 123–146). Berkely & London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  31. Timberman, David G. (1991). A Changeless Land. Continuity and Change in Philippine Politics. Singapore: ISEAS.Google Scholar
  32. The Economist vom 23.05.2014. A bone to pick.Google Scholar
  33. Unite, Angelo A. & Beveridge, Steve (1998). U.S. Investors’ Response to Philippine Capital Market Liberalization: Evidence from the First Philippine Fund. Journal of Philippine Development 25, S. 253–287.Google Scholar
  34. Verba, Sidney & Almond, Gabriel (1963). The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Weltbank (2013). Philippines. Country at a glance. (www.worldbank.org)
  36. Wurfel, David (1988). Filipino Politics. Development and Decay. Ithaca und London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für Politische WissenschaftUniversität Erlangen-NürnbergErlangenDeutschland

Personalised recommendations