Skip to main content

Single-sex teaching in co-educational schools: A panacea for raising achievement?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Jungen – Pädagogik

Part of the book series: Kinder, Kindheiten, Kindheitsforschung ((KKK,volume 6))

Within the United Kingdom, there has been an ideological resistance to the notion that single-sex teaching has any place in co-educational, secondary comprehensive schools, supported by evidence which suggests that single-sex classes for boys can reinforce stereotypical images and attitudes, and marginalize boys who do not identify with notions of hegemonic masculinity. In some contexts, however, recent research suggests that some boys and some girls feel more comfortable and more motivated in single-sex classes, and that academic achievement can be enhanced. This paper explores the pre-conditions which need to be in place if single-sex teaching is to be effective in transforming the achievement levels of both girls and boys, and addresses a number of crucial questions related to curriculum and pedagogy. It concludes by asking whether single-sex teaching is really a panacea for raising achievement or simply another false dawn.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Acker, Sandra (1988): Teachers, gender and resistance. In: British Journal of Sociology of Education, 9, pp. 307–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnot, Madeleine/David, Miriam/Weiner, Gaby (eds.) (1999): Closing the Gender Gap: Postwar Education and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnot, Madeleine/Miles, Philip (2005): A reconstruction of the gender agenda: the contradictory gender dimensions in New Labour’s educational and economic policy. In: Oxford Review of Education, 31(1), pp. 173–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnot, Madeleine/Weiner, Gaby (eds.) (1987): Gender and the Politics of Schooling. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, Stephen/Gewirtz, Sharon (1997): Girls in the education market: choice, competition and complexity. In:Gender and Education, 9, pp. 207–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biddulph, Steve (1997) (ed.): Raising Boys: Why boys are different – and how to help them become happy and well-balanced men. Sydney: Finch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Cherry/Kenway, Jane/McLeod, Julie (eds.) (2000): Factors Influencing the Educational Performance of males and females in School and their Initial Destination after Leaving School. Adelaide: Deakin University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, Debbie/Elwood, Janette/Hey, Valerie/Maw, Janet (eds.) (1998): Failing Boys? Issues in Gender and Achievement. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faulkner, Joy (1991): Mixed-sex schooling and equal opportunities for girls: a contradiction in terms? In: Research Papers in Education, 6, pp. 197–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, Becky/Skelton, Christine (2005) (eds.): Reassessing Gender and Achievement. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, Tuula (1996): Citizenship, Difference and Marginality in Schools: Spatial and Embodied Aspects of Gender Construction. In: Patricia Murphy and Caroline Gipps (eds.): Equity in the Classroom: Towards EffectivePedagogy for Girls and Boys. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, Geoff (ed.) (1999): Improving Boys’ Performance. London: Folens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herr, Kathryn/Arms, Emily (2004): Accountability and Single-Sex Schooling: A Collision of Reform Agendas. In: American Educational Research Journal, 41, pp. 527–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, Lea/Datnow, Amanda (eds.) (2005): Do Single-Sex Schools Improve the Education of Low-Income and Minority Students? An Investigation of California’s Public Single-Gender Academies. In: Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 36, pp.115–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, C./Smith, I. (2000): Poles apart? An exploration of single-sex and mixed-sex educational environments in Australia and England. In: Educational Studies, 26, pp. 409–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Carolyn (2002): Can Single-Sex Classes in Co-educational Schools Enhance the Learning experiences of Girls and/ or Boys? An Exploration of Pupils’ Perceptions. In: British Educational Research Journal, 28, pp. 37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johannesson, Ingólfur (2004): To teach boys and girls: a pro-feminist perspective on the boys’ debate in Iceland.In: Educational Review, 56, pp. 33–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenway, Jane/Willis, Sue/Blackmore, Jill/Rennie, Leonie (eds.) (1998): Answering Back: girls, boys and feminism in school. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kruse, Anne-Mette (1996): Single-sex settings; pedagogies for girls and boys in Danish schools. In: Murphy, Patricia/Gipps, Caroline (eds.): Equity in the Classroom: towards effective pedagogy for girls and boys. London:Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, Bob (2003): Where to in gender policy in education after recuperative masculinity politics? In: Journal of Inclusive Education 7(1), pp. 33–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, Bob/Douglas, Peter (eds.) (1999): Men engaging feminisms: Pro-feminism, backlashes and schooling. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahony, Pat (ed.) (1985): Schools for the Boys? Co-education Reassessed. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martino, Wayne/Berrill, Deborah (2003): Boys, Schooling & Masculinities: interrogating the ‚Right‘ ways to educate boys. In: Educational Review, 55, pp. 99–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martino, Wayne/Mills, Martin/Lingard, Bob (2005): Interrogating single-sex classes as a strategy for addressing boys’ educational and social needs. In: Oxford Review of Education. 31, pp. 237–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martino, Wayne/Pallotta-Chiarolli, Maria (2003) (eds.): So What’s a Boy? Addressing Issues of Masculinity and Schooling. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, Kate (ed.) (2000): Whatever Happened to Equal Opportunities in Schools? Gender Equality Initiatives in Education. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohrn, Elisabet (2001): Marginalization of democratic values: a gendered practice of schooling? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 5, pp. 319–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, William (eds.) (1998): Rescuing our sons from the myths of boyhood. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reay, Diane (2001): ‚Spice girls‘, ‚nice girls‘, ‚girlies‘ and tomboys: gender discourses, girls’ cultures and femininities in the primary classroom. In: Gender and Education, Vol. 13(2), pp.153–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, Pamela/Smithers, Alan (1999): Should the sexes be separated for secondary education – comparisons of single-sex and co-educational schools? In: Research Papers in Education, Vol. 14, pp. 23–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sax, Leonard (ed.) (2005): Why Gender Matters. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skelton, Christine (2003): Typical boys? Theorising masculinity in educational settings. In: Francis, Becky/Skelton, Christine (eds.): Investigating Gender: Contemporary Perspectives in Education. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, Andrea (1996): The lost boys. In: Managing Schools Today, pp. 24–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanworth, Michelle (ed.) (1981): Gender and Schooling. London: Century Hutchinson.Sukhnandan, Laura/Lee, Barbara/Kelleher, Sara (eds.) (2000): An Investigation into Gender Differences and Achievement: phase 2: school and classroom strategies. Slough: NFER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, Margaret (1999): Gender Equity in Success at School. In: International Review of Education, Vol. 45,pp. 431–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swan, Beverley (1998): Teaching boys and girls in separate classes at Shenfield High School, Brentwood. In:Kevan Bleach (ed.): Raising Boys’ Achievement in Schools. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titus, Jordan (2004): Boy Trouble: Rhetorical Framing of boys’ underachievement, Discourse, Vol.25, pp.145–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Houtte, Mieke (2004): Why boys achieve less at school than girls: the difference between boys’ and girls’ academic culture. In: Educational Studies, Vol. 30, pp.159–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warrington, Molly/Younger, Mike (2001): Single-sex classes and equal opportunities for girls and boys: perspectives through time from a mixed comprehensive school in England, Oxford Review of Education, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 339–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warrington, Molly/Younger, Mike (2003): ‚We decided to give it a Twirl‘: single-sex teaching in English comprehensive schools. In: Gender and Education, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 339–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, Susan (1997): Single-sex education for girls: heterosexuality, gendered subjectivity and school choice. In: British Journal of Sociology of Education, Vol. 18, pp. 371–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver-Hightower, Marcus (2003): The „Boy Turn“ in Research on Gender and Education. In: Review of Educational Research, Vol. 73(4), 471–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, Anne/Hunter, Jan (1993): Parents’ views on mixed and single-sex secondary schools. In: British Educational Research Journal, Vol. 19, pp. 369–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Younger, Mike/Warrington, Molly (2002): Single-sex classes in co-educational comprehensive schools in England: an evaluation based upon students’ performance and classroom interactions. In: British Educational Research Journal, Vol. 28, No.3, pp. 353–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Younger, Mike/Warrington, Molly/Gray, John/Rudduck, Jean/McLellan, Ros/Bearne, Eve/Kershner, Ruth/Bricheno, Pat (2005a): Raising Boys’ Achievement. In: DfES Research Report 636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Younger, Mike/Warrington, Molly/McLellan, Ros (eds.) (2005b): Raising Boys’ Achievement in Secondary Schools: issues, dilemmas and opportunities. Open University Press: Maidenhead.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Younger, M. (2012). Single-sex teaching in co-educational schools: A panacea for raising achievement?. In: Chwalek, DT., Diaz, M., Fegter, S., Graff, U. (eds) Jungen – Pädagogik. Kinder, Kindheiten, Kindheitsforschung, vol 6. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-94290-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-94290-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-18416-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-94290-2

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics