Advertisement

Single-sex teaching in co-educational schools: A panacea for raising achievement?

  • Mike Younger
Chapter
Part of the Kinder, Kindheiten, Kindheitsforschung book series (KKK, volume 6)

Within the United Kingdom, there has been an ideological resistance to the notion that single-sex teaching has any place in co-educational, secondary comprehensive schools, supported by evidence which suggests that single-sex classes for boys can reinforce stereotypical images and attitudes, and marginalize boys who do not identify with notions of hegemonic masculinity. In some contexts, however, recent research suggests that some boys and some girls feel more comfortable and more motivated in single-sex classes, and that academic achievement can be enhanced. This paper explores the pre-conditions which need to be in place if single-sex teaching is to be effective in transforming the achievement levels of both girls and boys, and addresses a number of crucial questions related to curriculum and pedagogy. It concludes by asking whether single-sex teaching is really a panacea for raising achievement or simply another false dawn.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Acker, Sandra (1988): Teachers, gender and resistance. In: British Journal of Sociology of Education, 9, pp. 307–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnot, Madeleine/David, Miriam/Weiner, Gaby (eds.) (1999): Closing the Gender Gap: Postwar Education and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  3. Arnot, Madeleine/Miles, Philip (2005): A reconstruction of the gender agenda: the contradictory gender dimensions in New Labour’s educational and economic policy. In: Oxford Review of Education, 31(1), pp. 173–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnot, Madeleine/Weiner, Gaby (eds.) (1987): Gender and the Politics of Schooling. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  5. Ball, Stephen/Gewirtz, Sharon (1997): Girls in the education market: choice, competition and complexity. In:Gender and Education, 9, pp. 207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biddulph, Steve (1997) (ed.): Raising Boys: Why boys are different – and how to help them become happy and well-balanced men. Sydney: Finch.Google Scholar
  7. Collins, Cherry/Kenway, Jane/McLeod, Julie (eds.) (2000): Factors Influencing the Educational Performance of males and females in School and their Initial Destination after Leaving School. Adelaide: Deakin University.Google Scholar
  8. Epstein, Debbie/Elwood, Janette/Hey, Valerie/Maw, Janet (eds.) (1998): Failing Boys? Issues in Gender and Achievement. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Faulkner, Joy (1991): Mixed-sex schooling and equal opportunities for girls: a contradiction in terms? In: Research Papers in Education, 6, pp. 197–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Francis, Becky/Skelton, Christine (2005) (eds.): Reassessing Gender and Achievement. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gordon, Tuula (1996): Citizenship, Difference and Marginality in Schools: Spatial and Embodied Aspects of Gender Construction. In: Patricia Murphy and Caroline Gipps (eds.): Equity in the Classroom: Towards EffectivePedagogy for Girls and Boys. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hannan, Geoff (ed.) (1999): Improving Boys’ Performance. London: Folens.Google Scholar
  13. Herr, Kathryn/Arms, Emily (2004): Accountability and Single-Sex Schooling: A Collision of Reform Agendas. In: American Educational Research Journal, 41, pp. 527–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hubbard, Lea/Datnow, Amanda (eds.) (2005): Do Single-Sex Schools Improve the Education of Low-Income and Minority Students? An Investigation of California’s Public Single-Gender Academies. In: Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 36, pp.115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jackson, C./Smith, I. (2000): Poles apart? An exploration of single-sex and mixed-sex educational environments in Australia and England. In: Educational Studies, 26, pp. 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jackson, Carolyn (2002): Can Single-Sex Classes in Co-educational Schools Enhance the Learning experiences of Girls and/ or Boys? An Exploration of Pupils’ Perceptions. In: British Educational Research Journal, 28, pp. 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johannesson, Ingólfur (2004): To teach boys and girls: a pro-feminist perspective on the boys’ debate in Iceland.In: Educational Review, 56, pp. 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kenway, Jane/Willis, Sue/Blackmore, Jill/Rennie, Leonie (eds.) (1998): Answering Back: girls, boys and feminism in school. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kruse, Anne-Mette (1996): Single-sex settings; pedagogies for girls and boys in Danish schools. In: Murphy, Patricia/Gipps, Caroline (eds.): Equity in the Classroom: towards effective pedagogy for girls and boys. London:Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  20. Lingard, Bob (2003): Where to in gender policy in education after recuperative masculinity politics? In: Journal of Inclusive Education 7(1), pp. 33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lingard, Bob/Douglas, Peter (eds.) (1999): Men engaging feminisms: Pro-feminism, backlashes and schooling. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Mahony, Pat (ed.) (1985): Schools for the Boys? Co-education Reassessed. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  23. Martino, Wayne/Berrill, Deborah (2003): Boys, Schooling & Masculinities: interrogating the ‚Right‘ ways to educate boys. In: Educational Review, 55, pp. 99–117.Google Scholar
  24. Martino, Wayne/Mills, Martin/Lingard, Bob (2005): Interrogating single-sex classes as a strategy for addressing boys’ educational and social needs. In: Oxford Review of Education. 31, pp. 237–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Martino, Wayne/Pallotta-Chiarolli, Maria (2003) (eds.): So What’s a Boy? Addressing Issues of Masculinity and Schooling. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Myers, Kate (ed.) (2000): Whatever Happened to Equal Opportunities in Schools? Gender Equality Initiatives in Education. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Ohrn, Elisabet (2001): Marginalization of democratic values: a gendered practice of schooling? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 5, pp. 319–328.Google Scholar
  28. Pollack, William (eds.) (1998): Rescuing our sons from the myths of boyhood. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  29. Reay, Diane (2001): ‚Spice girls‘, ‚nice girls‘, ‚girlies‘ and tomboys: gender discourses, girls’ cultures and femininities in the primary classroom. In: Gender and Education, Vol. 13(2), pp.153–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Robinson, Pamela/Smithers, Alan (1999): Should the sexes be separated for secondary education – comparisons of single-sex and co-educational schools? In: Research Papers in Education, Vol. 14, pp. 23–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sax, Leonard (ed.) (2005): Why Gender Matters. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  32. Skelton, Christine (2003): Typical boys? Theorising masculinity in educational settings. In: Francis, Becky/Skelton, Christine (eds.): Investigating Gender: Contemporary Perspectives in Education. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Slater, Andrea (1996): The lost boys. In: Managing Schools Today, pp. 24–26.Google Scholar
  34. Stanworth, Michelle (ed.) (1981): Gender and Schooling. London: Century Hutchinson.Sukhnandan, Laura/Lee, Barbara/Kelleher, Sara (eds.) (2000): An Investigation into Gender Differences and Achievement: phase 2: school and classroom strategies. Slough: NFER.Google Scholar
  35. Sutherland, Margaret (1999): Gender Equity in Success at School. In: International Review of Education, Vol. 45,pp. 431–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Swan, Beverley (1998): Teaching boys and girls in separate classes at Shenfield High School, Brentwood. In:Kevan Bleach (ed.): Raising Boys’ Achievement in Schools. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
  37. Titus, Jordan (2004): Boy Trouble: Rhetorical Framing of boys’ underachievement, Discourse, Vol.25, pp.145–169.Google Scholar
  38. Van Houtte, Mieke (2004): Why boys achieve less at school than girls: the difference between boys’ and girls’ academic culture. In: Educational Studies, Vol. 30, pp.159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Warrington, Molly/Younger, Mike (2001): Single-sex classes and equal opportunities for girls and boys: perspectives through time from a mixed comprehensive school in England, Oxford Review of Education, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 339–356.Google Scholar
  40. Warrington, Molly/Younger, Mike (2003): ‚We decided to give it a Twirl‘: single-sex teaching in English comprehensive schools. In: Gender and Education, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 339–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Watson, Susan (1997): Single-sex education for girls: heterosexuality, gendered subjectivity and school choice. In: British Journal of Sociology of Education, Vol. 18, pp. 371–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Weaver-Hightower, Marcus (2003): The „Boy Turn“ in Research on Gender and Education. In: Review of Educational Research, Vol. 73(4), 471–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. West, Anne/Hunter, Jan (1993): Parents’ views on mixed and single-sex secondary schools. In: British Educational Research Journal, Vol. 19, pp. 369–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Younger, Mike/Warrington, Molly (2002): Single-sex classes in co-educational comprehensive schools in England: an evaluation based upon students’ performance and classroom interactions. In: British Educational Research Journal, Vol. 28, No.3, pp. 353–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Younger, Mike/Warrington, Molly/Gray, John/Rudduck, Jean/McLellan, Ros/Bearne, Eve/Kershner, Ruth/Bricheno, Pat (2005a): Raising Boys’ Achievement. In: DfES Research Report 636.Google Scholar
  46. Younger, Mike/Warrington, Molly/McLellan, Ros (eds.) (2005b): Raising Boys’ Achievement in Secondary Schools: issues, dilemmas and opportunities. Open University Press: Maidenhead.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mike Younger
    • 1
  1. 1.BielefeldDeutschland

Personalised recommendations