Zusammenfassung
Das zunehmende Interesse an öffentlichen Soziologien kennzeichnet eine wachsende Lücke zwischen dem Ethos der Soziologen und sozialen, politischen und wirtschaftlichen Tendenzen in der Gesellschaft allgemein. Die öffentliche Soziologie zielt darauf ab, die öffentliche Debatte über moralische und politische Fragen durch das Einbringen soziologischer Theorie und Forschung zu bereichern. Sie ist von der policy- oder anwendungsorientierten, der professionellen und der kritischen Soziologie zu unterscheiden.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
Abbott, Andrew. 2001. Chaos of Disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bellah, Robert, Richard Madsen, William M. Sullivan, Ann Swidler und Steven Tipton. 1985. Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. (Dt.: Gewohnheiten des Herzens: Individualismus und Gemeinsinn in der amerikanischen Gesellschaft, übers. von Ingrid Peikert, Bund Verlag, 1987).
Cole, Stephen, (Hrsg.). 2001. What’s Wrong with Sociology? New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Coleman, James. 1966. Equality of Educational Opportunity. Washington, DC: United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
Ders., 1975. Trends in School Segregation, 1968-1973. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
Durkheim, Emile. [1893] 1984. The Division of Labor in Society. ORT: Free Press. (Dt. Über soziale Arbeitsteilung, Suhrkamp)
Gouldner, Alvin. 1970. The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology. Basic Books. London: Heinemann.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action. 2 Bde. Boston: Beacon Press. (Original: Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, Suhrkamp, 1981)
Horowitz, Irving Louis. 1993. The Decomposition of Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lakatos, Imre. 1978. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Lee.
Lee, Alfred McClung. 1976. „Sociology for Whom?“ American Sociological Review 44:925-936
Lynd, Robert. 1939. Knowledge for What? The Place of Social Sciences in American Culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Mann, Michael. 2003. Incoherent Empire. New York: Verso Books. (Dt. Die ohnmächtige Supermacht, übers. von Thomas Atzert, Campus Verlag, 2003)
Milkman, Ruth. 1986. „Women’s History and the Sears Case”. Feminist Studies 12:375-400.
Mills, C. Wright. 1959. The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press. (Dt. Kritik der soziologischen Denkweise, Luchterhand 1963).
Moynihan, Daniel Patrick. 1965. The Negro Family: The Case for National Action. United States Department of Labor.
Mueller, John. 1973. War, Presidents and Public Opinion. New York: Wiley.
Myrdal, Gunnar. 1944. An American Dilemma: The Negro Problem and Modern Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
Putnam, Robert. 2001. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Rhoades, Lawrence. 1981. A History of the American Sociological Association, 1905-1980. Washington D.C.: American Sociological Association,.
Riesman, David. 1950. The Lonely Crowd: A Study of the Changing American Character. Yale University Press. (Dt. Die einsame Masse. Eine Untersuchung der Wandlungen des amerikanischen Charakters, übers. von Renate Rausch, Rowohlt, 1958).
Skocpol, Theda. 2003. Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life. Norman: University of Oklahoma press.
Sorokin, Pitirim. 1956. Fads and Foibles in Modern Sociology and Related Sciences. Chicago: Henry Regnery.
Stacey, Judith. 2004. „Marital Suitors Court Social Science Spin-Sters: The Unwittingly Conservative Effects of Public Sociology“. Social Problems 51:131-145.
Stacey, Judith und Timothy Biblarz. 2001. “(How) Does the Sexual Orientation of Parents Matter?” American Sociological Review 66:159-183.
Turner, Stephen und Jonathan Turner. 1990. The Impossible Science: An Institutional Analysis of American Sociology. Sage Publications.
Vaughan, Diane. 1996. The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dies., 2004. “Public Sociologist by Accident.” Social Problems 51:115-118.
Wolfe, Alan. 1998. One Nation, After All. New York: Viking.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Burawoy, M. (2012). Öffentliche Soziologien: Widersprüche, Dilemmata und Möglichkeiten. In: Unzicker, K., Hessler, G. (eds) Öffentliche Sozialforschung und Verantwortung für die Praxis. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-94221-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-94221-6_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-531-18187-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-531-94221-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)