Skip to main content

Die Akteure des soziologischen Neo-Institutionalismus

  • Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Der soziologische Neo-Institutionalismus interessiere sich nicht für Akteure, so lautet eine tradierte Einschätzung, die Kritiker in den 1980er Jahren noch mit einiger Berechtigung vortragen konnten (Perrow 1985; DiMaggio 1988). Was seitdem ohnehin nur noch begrenzt zutraf, ist für die Gegenwartssituation endgültig überholt. Im Gegenteil: Wer sich die aktuelle Forschung vor Augen führt, mag sogar den Eindruck gewinnen, dass gegenwärtig kaum eine Frage neo-institutionalistischinspirierte Autorinnen so sehr bewegt, wie die nach den Akteuren.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Barth, Fredrik (1963): The Role of the Entrepreneur in Social Change in Northern Norway. Oslo/ Bergen/Tromso: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batilana, Julie (2006): Agency and Institutions. The Enabling Role of Individuals de l ‗ habitus Social Position. In: Organization 13: 653–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckert, Jens (1999): Agency, Entrepreneus, and Institutional Change. The Role of Strategic Choice and Institutionalized Practices in Organizations. In: Organization Studies 20: 777–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Peter L. (2005) (Hg.): The Desecularization of the World. Resurgent Religion and World Politics. Washington: Ethics and Public Policy Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Peter L./Thomas Luckmann (1969): Die gesellschaftliche Konstruktion der Wirklichkeit. Frankfurt/Main: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunsson, Nils (1989): The Organization of Hypocrisy. Talk, Decisions and Actions in Organizations. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunsson, Nils/Kerstin Sahlin-Andersson (2000): Constructing Organizations: The Example of Public Sector Reform. In: Organization Studies 21: 721–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, James S. (1979): Macht und Gesellschaftsstruktur. Tübingen: Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska, Barbara/Guje Sevón (Hg.) (1996): Translating Organizational Change. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul J. (1988): Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory. In: Lynne G. Zucker (Hg.): Institutional Patterns and Organizations. Culture and Environment. Cambridge: Ballinger, S. 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul J./Walter W. Powell (1983): The Iron Cage Revisited. Institutional Isomor phism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. In: American Sociological Review 48: 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul J./Walter W. Powell (1991): Introduction. In: Walter W. Powell./Paul J. DiMaggio (Hg.): The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chi cago Press, S. 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drori, Gili S./John W. Meyer/Hokyu Hwang (2009): Global Organization: Rationalization and Actorhood as Dominant Scripts. In: Institutions and Ideology. Resear A in the Sociology of Organizations 27: 17–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstadt, Shmuel N. (1968): Social Institution. In: David L. Sills (Hg.): International Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 14. New York: Macmillan, S. 409–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, David/John W. Meyer (2002): The Profusion of Individual Roles and Identities in the Postwar Period. In: Sociological Theory 20: 86–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedland, Roger/Robert R. Alford (1991): Bringing Society Back in: Symbols, Practices and Institutional Contradictions. In: Walter W. Powell./Paul J. DiMaggio (Hg.): The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, S. 232–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, Harold (1967): Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garud, Raghu/Cynthia Hardy/Steve Maguire (2007): Institutional Entrepreneurship as Embedded Agency: An Introduction to The Special Issue. In: Organization Studies 27: 957–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, Royston/Christine Oliver/Kerstin Sahlin/Roy Suddaby (2008) (Hg.): The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, Royston/Roy Suddaby (2006): Institutional Entrepreneurship in Mature Fields: The Big Five Accounting Firms. In: Academy of Management Journal 49: 27–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greshoff, Rainer/Georg Kneer/Uwe Schimank (2003) (Hg.): Die Transintentionalität des Sozialen. Eine vergleichende Betrachtung klassischer und moderner Sozialtheorien. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, Michael T./John Freeman (1984): Structural Inertia and Organizational Change. In: American Sociological Review 50: 639–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, Cynthia/Steve Maguire (2008): Institutional Entrepreneuship. In: Royston Greenwood/ Christine Oliver/Kerstin Sahlin/Roy Suddaby (Hg.): The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. Thousand Oaks: Sage, S. 198–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasse, Raimund/Georg Krücken (2005): Neo-Institutionalismus. 2. Aufl. Bielefeld: transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, Hokyu/Jeannette A. Colyvas (2011): Problematizing Actors and Institutions in Institutional Work. In: Journal of Management Inquiry 21: 62–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jepperson, Ronald L./Ann Swidler (1994): What Properties of Culture Should we Measure ? In: Poetics 22: 359–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraatz, Matthew S./Emily S. Blo A (2008): Organizational Implications of Institutional Pluralism. In: Royston Greenwood/Christine Oliver/Kerstin Sahlin/Roy Suddaby (Hg.): The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. Thousand Oaks: Sage, S. 243–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krücken, Georg/Gili S. Drori (2009) (Hg.): World Society: The Writings of John W. Meyer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, Thomas B./Roy Suddaby (2006): Institutions and Institutional Work. In: Stewart Clegg/Cynthia Hardy/Walter R. Nord/Thomas B. Lawrence (Hg.): Handbook of Organization Studies. 2. Aufl. Thousand Oaks: Sage, S. 215–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, Thomas B./Roy Suddaby/Bernard Leca (2009a) (Hg.): Institutional Work. Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations. Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, Thomas B./Roy Suddaby/Bernard Leca (2009b): Introduction: Theorizing and Studying Institutional Work. In: Thomas B. Lawrence/Roy Suddaby/Bernard Leca (Hg.): Institutional Work. Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations. Cambridge: University Press, S. 1–27.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, Thomas B./Roy Suddaby/Bernard Leca (2011): Institutional Work: Refocusing Institutional Studies of Organization. In: Journal of Management Inquiry 21: 52–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, Niklas (1984): Soziale Systeme. Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt/ Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, Niklas (1997): Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz, Renate/Fritz W. Scharpf (1995): Der Ansatz des akteurzentrierten Institutionalismus. In: Renate Mayntz/Fritz W. Scharpf (Hg.): Gesellschaftliche Selbstregelung und politische Steuerung. Frankfurt/Main: Campus, S. 39–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, Frank (2009): Die Universität als Akteur: zum institutionellen Wandel der Hochschul- organisation. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, Robert K. (1936): The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action. In: American Sociological Review 1: 894–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, Renate E. (2008): New Sociology of Knowledge: Historical Legacy and Current Strands. In: Royston Greenwood/Christine Oliver/Kerstin Sahlin/Roy Suddaby (Hg.): The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. Thousand Oaks: Sage, S. 517–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, John W./Brian Rowan (1977): Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structures as Myth and Ceremony. In: American Journal of Sociology 83: 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, John W./John Boli/George M. Thomas (1994): Ontology and Rationalization in the Western Cultural Account. In: W. Richard Scott, John W. Meyer (Hg.): Institutional Environments and Organizations. Structural Complexity and Indiviudalism. Thousand Oaks: Sage, S. 9–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, John W./John Boli/George M. Thomas/Francisco O. Ramirez (2005): Die Weltgesells chaft und der Nationalstaat. In: John W. Meyer: Weltkultur. Wie die westli chen Prinzipien die Welt durchdringen. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp, S. 85–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, John W./Ronald L. Jepperson (2000): The „Actors“ of Modern Society: The Cultural Construction of Social Agency. In: Sociological Theory 18: 100–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, Christine (1991): Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes. In: Academy of Management Review 16: 145–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Talcott (1951): The Social System. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, Charles (1985): Review Essay: Overboard with Myths and Symbols. Review of John W. Meyer and W. Ri Aard Scott: Organizational Environments – Ritual and Rationality. In: American Journal of Sociology 91: 151–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, Walter W./Jeannette A. Colyvas (2008): Microfoundations of Institutional Theory. In: Royston Greenwood/Christine Oliver/Kerstin Sahlin/Roy Suddaby (Hg.): The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. Thousand Oaks: Sage, S. 276–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, Walter W./Paul J. DiMaggio (Hg.) (1991): The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlin, Kerstin/Linda Wedlin (2008): Circulating Ideas: Imitation, Translation and Editing. In: Royston Greenwood/Christine Oliver/Kerstin Sahlin/Roy Suddaby (Hg.): The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. Thousand Oaks: Sage, S. 218–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimank, Uwe (1992): Spezifische Interessenkonsense trotz generellem Orientierungsdissens: Ein Integrationsmechanismus polyzentrischer Gesellschaften. In: Hans-Joachim Giegel (Hg.): Kommunikation und Konsens in modernen Gesells chaften. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp, S. 236–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz-Schaeffer, Ingo (2007): Zugeschriebene Handlungen. Ein Beitrag zur Theorie sozialen Handelns. Weilerswist: Velbrück.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, Georg (1908): Soziologie. Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strandgaard Pedersen, Jesper/Frank Dobbin (1997): The Social Invention of Actors. On the Rise of the Organization. In: American Behavioral Scientist 40: 431–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, Patricia H./William Ocasio (2008): Institutional Logics. In: Royston Greenwood/ Christine Oliver/Kerstin Sahlin/Roy Suddaby (Hg.): The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. Thousand Oaks, London: Sage, S. 99–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolbert, Pamela S./Lynne G. Zucker (1996): The Institutionalization of Institutional Theory. In: Stewart Clegg/Cynthia Hardy/Walter R. Nord (Hg.): Handbook of Organization Studies. Thousand Oaks: Sage, S. 175–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walgenbach, Peter/Renate Meyer (2008): Neoinstitutionalistische Organisationstheorie. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, Karl E. (1995): Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weik, Elke (2011): Institutional Entrepreneurship and Agency. In: Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior (im Erscheinen).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zilber, Tammar B. (2002): Institutionalization as an Interplay between Actions, Meanings and Actors. The Case of a Rape Crisis Center in Israel. In: Academy of Management Journal. 45: 234–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Meier, F. (2011). Die Akteure des soziologischen Neo-Institutionalismus. In: Lüdtke, N., Matsuzaki, H. (eds) Akteur – Individuum – Subjekt. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93463-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93463-1_10

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-17854-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-93463-1

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics