Advertisement

Toleranz und Diskriminierung zwischen sozialen Gruppen

  • Thomas KesslerEmail author
  • Immo Fritsche
Chapter
  • 17k Downloads
Part of the Basiswissen Psychologie book series (BASPSY)

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Kapitel stellen wir die zentralen Begriffe wie Vorurteile, soziale Diskriminierung und soziale Stereotype vor und führen in klassische und moderne Ansätze zu ihrer Erklärung ein. Es werden sowohl persönlichkeitsorientierte Ansätze, die Theorie des realistischen Gruppenkonflikts als auch die Theorie der sozialen Identität vorgestellt. Ein weiterer Teil des Kapitels widmet sich grundlegenden Prozessen von Intergruppenphänomenen wie Kategorisierung, Identifikation, Gruppenmotivationen usw. Das Kapitel schließt mit der Erklärung und Ansätzen zur Reduktion von Vorurteilen und Intergruppenkonflikten ab.

Literatur

  1. Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswick, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  2. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  3. Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.Google Scholar
  4. Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Binder, J., Zagefka, H., Brown, R., Funke, F., Kessler, T., Mummendey, A., Demoulin, J. P., Leyens, A., & Maquil, A. (2009). Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis in three European Countries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 843–856.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brewer, M. B., & Miller, N. (1984). Beyond the contact hypothesis: Theoretical perspectives on desegregation. In N. Miller & M. B. Brewer (Hrsg.), Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation (S. 281–302). Orlando: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, R. (2010). Prejudice: Its social psychology,. 2. Aufl. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, R. J. (1978). Divided we fall: An analysis of relations between sections of a factory workforce. In H. Tajfel (Hrsg.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, R. J., & Hewstone, M. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 255–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Campbell, D. T. (1965). Ethnocentric and other altruistic motives. In D. Levine (Hrsg.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Bd. 13). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  12. Camus, A. (1969). Der Mythos von Sisyphos. Ein Versuch über das Absurde. Hamburg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch.Google Scholar
  13. Cook, S. W. (1969). Motives in a conceptual analysis of attitude-related behavior. In J. Brigham & T. Weissbach (Hrsg.), Racial attitudes in America: Analyses and findings of social psychology (S. 250–260). New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  14. Crandall, C. S., Eshleman, A., & O’Brien, L. (2002). Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: The struggle for internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 359–378.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Durkheim, E. (1992). Über soziale Arbeitsteilung. Studie über die Organisation höherer Gesellschaften. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  16. Ellemers, N. (1993). The influence of socio-structural variables on identity management strategies. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Hrsg.), European review of social psychology (Bd. 4, S. 27–57). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Ellemers, N., et al. (1997). Sticking together or falling apart: In-group identification as a psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 617–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ferguson, C. K., & Kelley, H. H. (1964). Significant factors in overevaluation of own-group’s product. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 223–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fromm, E. (1947). Man for himself. An inquiry into the psychology of ethics. New York: Rinehart.Google Scholar
  20. Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias. The common ingroup identity model. Philadelphia: Psychology.Google Scholar
  21. Gaertner, S. L., Mann, J. A., Murrell, A., & Dovidio, J. F. (1989). Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 239–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hewstone, M., & Brown, R. (1986). Contact is not enough: An intergroup perspective on the contact hypothesis. In M. Hewstone & R. Brown (Hrsg.), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters (S. 1–44). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  23. Kaas, L., & Manger, C. (2010). Ethnic discrimination in Germany’s labour market: A field experiment (IZA discussion paper 4741). Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).Google Scholar
  24. Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kessler, T., & Cohrs, J. C. (2008). The evolution of authoritarian processes: How to commit group members to group norms. Group Dynamics Theory, Research, and Practice, 12, 73–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kessler, T., & Mummendey, A. (2001). Is there any scapegoat around? Determinants of intergroup conflict at different categorization levels. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1090–1102.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Mummendey, A., & Otten, S. (1998). Positive-negative asymmetry in social discrimination. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Hrsg.), European review of social psychology (Bd. 9, S. 107–143). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  28. Mummendey, A., & Wenzel, M. (1999). Social discrimination and tolerance in intergroup relations: Reactions to intergroup difference. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 158–174.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Navarrete, C. D., McDonald, M. M., Molina, L. E., & Sidanius, J. (2010). Prejudice at the nexus of race and gender: An outgroup male target hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 933–945.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Onu, D., Smith, J., & Kessler, T. (2015). Intergroup emulation: An improvement strategy for lower-status groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 18, 210–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pettigrew, T. F. (1997). Generalized intergroup contact effects on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 173–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pettigrew, T. F., & Mertens, R. W. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test and reformulation of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Rabbie, J. M., & Horowitz, M. (1969). Arousal of ingroup-outgroup bias by a chance to win or loss. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 269–277.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Reynolds, K. J., Turner, J. C., & Haslam, S. A. (2000). When are we better than them and they worse than us? A closer look at social discrimination in positive and negative domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 64–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Sassenberg, K., Kessler, T., & Mummendey, A. (2003). Less negative = more positive? Social discrimination as avoidance and approach. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 48–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sherif, M. (1966). In common predicament. Social psychology of intergroup conflict and cooperation. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  38. Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., White, B. J., Hood, W. R., & Sherif, C. W. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation. The robbers cave experiment. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
  39. Sherif, M., White, B. J., & Harvey, O. J. (1955). Status in experimentally produced groups. American Journal of Sociology, 60, 370–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sibley, C., & Duckitt, J. (2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 248–279.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorization, social identity and social comparison. In H. Tajfel (Hrsg.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (S. 61–76). London: Academic.Google Scholar
  43. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Hrsg.), Psychology of intergroup relations (1. Aufl., S. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  44. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Hrsg.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2. Aufl., S. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  45. Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tausch, N., Becker, J. C., Spears, R., Christ, O., Saab, R., Singh, P., & Siddiqui, R. N. (2011). Explaining radical group behavior: Developing emotion and efficacy routes to normative and nonnormative collective action. Journal of personality and social psychology, 101, 129–148. doi:  10.1037/a0022728.
  47. Tischendorf, K. (2007). The impact of complexity of the superordinate category to intergroup relations. Interventive field studies to school mergers. Unveröffentlichte Doktorarbeit, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena.Google Scholar
  48. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (Hrsg.). (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  49. Waldzus, S., & Mummendey, A. (2004). Inclusion in a superordinate category, ingroup prototypicality, and attitudes towards outgroups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 466–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wenzel, M., Mummendey, A., & Waldzus, S. (2007). Superordinate identities and intergroup conflict: The ingroup projection model. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 331–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wright, S. C., Aron, A., McLaughlin-Volpe, T., & Ropp, S. A. (1997). The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Friedrich-Schiller-Universität JenaJenaDeutschland
  2. 2.Universität LeipzigLeipzigDeutschland

Personalised recommendations