Advertisement

Prozesse und Strukturen in Kleingruppen

  • Thomas KesslerEmail author
  • Immo Fritsche
Chapter
  • 16k Downloads
Part of the Basiswissen Psychologie book series (BASPSY)

Zusammenfassung

Wodurch entstehen Gruppen und durch welche Merkmale zeichnen sie sich aus? In diesem Kapitel werden Merkmale und Strukturen sozialer Gruppen eingeführt. Hier wird eine Verbindung zu vorherigen Kapiteln hergestellt, indem die Rolle von sozialen Normen sowie des geteilten Wissens bei der Formierung und Stabilisierung von Gruppen hervorgehoben wird (z. B. Gruppenkohäsion, Rollendifferenzierungen, usw.). Es werden Bedingungen vorgestellt, die die Leistungsfähigkeit von Gruppen beeinflussen (z. B. Führungsverhalten). Wir werden sowohl problematische Aspekte der Leistung von Gruppen (Gruppendenken, verborgene Profile von Expertengruppen, usw.) als auch positive Aspekte des Arbeitens in Gruppen (soziale Unterstützung, Aufbau einer positiven Identität, Köhler-Effekt, usw.) diskutieren.

Literatur

  1. Allport, F. H. (1937). Introduction: The Hanover round table – Social psychology of 1936. Social Forces, 15, 455–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumeister, R., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Berkowitz, L. (1954). Group standards, cohesiveness, and productivity. Human Relations, 7, 509–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Böckler, A., Hömke, P., & Sebanz, N. (2013). Invisible man: Exclusion from shared attention affects gaze behavior and self-reports. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 140–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bond, C. F., & Titus, L. J. (1983). Social facilitation: A meta-analysis of 241 studies. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 265–292.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Boyer, P., & Liénard, P. (2006). Why ritualized behavior? Precaution systems and action parsing in developmental, pathological and cultural rituals. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29, 595–613.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, R. (2000). Social identity theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 745–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell, D. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science, 314–325. doi:  10.1002/bs.3830030103.
  9. Casey-Campbell, M., & Martens, M. L. (2009). Sticking it all together: A critical assessment of the group cohesion-performance literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11, 223–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chang, Y. K., Hughes, L. C., & Mark, B. (2006). Fitting in or standing out: Nursing workgroup diversity and unit-level outcomes. Nursing Research, 55, 373–380. doi:  10.1097/00006199-200611000-00001.
  11. Cottrell, N. B., Wack, D. L., Sekerak, G. J., & Rittle, R. H. (1968). Social facilitation of dominant responses by the presence of an audience and the mere presence of others. Journal of personality and social psychology, 9, 245–250. doi:  10.1037/h0025902.
  12. Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eisenberger, N. I., Lieberman, M. D., & Williams, K. D. (2003). Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302, 290–292.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2000). Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. The American Economic Review, 90, 980–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gerard, H. B., & Mathewson, G. C. (1966). The effects of severity of initiation on liking for a group: A replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 278–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gonsalkorale, K., & Williams, K. D. (2007). The KKK won’t let me play: Ostracism even by a despised outgroup hurts. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1176–1186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., & Platow, M. J. (2011). The new psychology of leadership: Identity, influence and power. New York, NY, US: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  18. Henchy, T., & Glass, D. C. (1968). Evaluation apprehension and the social facilitation of dominant and subordinate responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 446–454.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1987). Intergroup behaviour, self‐stereotyping and the salience of social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 325–340. doi:  10.1111/j.2044-8309.1987.tb00795.x
  20. James, W. (1899). Talks to teachers on psychology: And to students on some life’s ideals. New York: Holt and Longmans, Green & Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jans, L., Postmes, T., & Van der Zee, K. I. (2012). Sharing differences: The inductive route to social identity formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1145–1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jones, F. H. (1987). Positive classroom discipline. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  23. Kuwabara, K. (2011). Cohesion, cooperation, and the value of doing things together: How economic exchange creates relational bonds. American Sociological Review, 76, 560–580. doi:  10.1177/0003122411414825
  24. Leary, M. R. (2004). The sociometer, self-esteem, and the regulation of interpersonal behavior. In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs (Hrsg.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (S. 373–391). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  25. LeBon, G. (1896). The crowd: A study of the popular mind. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  26. Manstead, A. S. R., & Semin, G. R. (1980). Social facilitation effects: Mere enhancement of dominant responses? British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 119–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McDougall, W. (1920). The group mind. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
  28. Merton, R. K. (1948). The self-fulfilling prophecy. The Antioch Review, 8, 193–210.Google Scholar
  29. Mikulincer, M. E., Shaver, P. R., Dovidio, J. F., & Simpson, J. A. (2015). APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Volume 2: Group processes. American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  30. Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (1982). Socialization in small groups: Temporal changes in individual-group relations. In L. Berkowitz (Hrsg.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Bd. 15, S. 137–192). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  31. Morris, C. G., & Hackman, J. R. (1969). Behavioral correlates of perceived leadership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 350–361. doi:  10.1037/h0028432.
  32. Mullen, B., Johnson, C., & Salas, E. (1991). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Psychology, 12, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nezlek, J. B., Kowalski, R. M., Leary, M. R., Belvins, T., & Holgate, S. (1997). Personality moderators of reactions to interpersonal rejection: Depression and trait self-esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1235–1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nijstad, B. A. (2015). Creativity in groups. In M. Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver, J. F. Dovidio, J. A. Simpson, M. Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver, & J. A. Simpson (Hrsg.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Volume 2: Group processes (pp. 35–65). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association. doi:  10.1037/14342-002.
  35. Osgood, C. E., Suci, G., & Tannenbaum, P. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  36. Platow, M. J., Foddy, M., Yamagishi, T., Lim, L., & Chow, A. (2012). Two experimental tests of trust in in‐group strangers: The moderating role of common knowledge of group membership. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 30–35. doi:  10.1002/ejsp.852.
  37. Postmes, T., & Jetten, J. (2006). Individuality and the group: Advances in social identity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Richman, L., & Leary, M. R. (2009). Reactions to discrimination, stigmatization, ostracism, and other forms of interpersonal rejection: A multimotive model. Psychological Review, 116, 365–383.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Rosenbaum, M. E., Moore, D. L., Cotton, J. L., Cook, M. S., Hieser, R. A., Shovar, M. N., et al. (1980). Group productivity and process: Pure and mixed reward structures and task interdependence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 626–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sasfy, J., & Okun, M. (1974). Form of evaluation and audience expertness as joint determinants of audience effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 461–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sherif, M. (1966). In common predicament: Social psychology of intergroup conflict and cooperation. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  42. Sosis, R., & Ruffle, B. (2003). Religious ritual and cooperation: Testing for a relationship on Israeli religious and secular kibbutzim. Current Anthropology, 44, 713–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group processes and productivity. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  44. Stroebe, W., & Diehl, M. (1994). Why groups are less effective than their members: On productivity losses in idea-generating groups. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Hrsg.), European review of social psychology (Bd. 5, S. 271–303). London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  45. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Hrsg.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (S. 7–24). Monterey: Brooks & Cole.Google Scholar
  46. Taylor, D. W., Berry, P. C., & Block, C. H. (1958). Does group participation when using brainstorming facilitate or inhibit creative thinking? Administrative Science Quarterly, 6, 22–47.Google Scholar
  47. Triplett, N. (1898). The dynamogenic factors in pacemaking and competition. American Journal of Psychology, 9, 507–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & McGarty, C. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 454–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Williams, K. D. (2009). Ostracism: A temporal need-threat model. In M. P. Zanna (Hrsg.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Bd. 41, S. 275–314). San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  51. Williams, K. D., Cheung, C. K., & Choi, W. (2000). Cyber ostracism: Effects of being ignored over the Internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychologie, 79, 748–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wiltermuth, S. S., & Heath, C. (2009). Synchrony and cooperation. Psychological Science, 20, 1–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Yamagishi, T. (1987). Interpersonal conflicts in reward allocation and their resolution. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 58, 78–83 (in Japanese).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269–274.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Friedrich-Schiller-Universität JenaJenaDeutschland
  2. 2.Universität LeipzigLeipzigDeutschland

Personalised recommendations