Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Grounded Theory Reader pp 207–229Cite as

Von der Grounded-Theory-Methodologie zur Situationsanalyse

  • Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Es ist mein Ziel, die Grounded-Theory-Methode dahin gehend zu überarbeiten und zu erneuern, dass Ansätze zur gegenstandsverankerten Theoriebildung postmodernen Verschiebungen in der Sozialtheorie und qualitativen Forschung noch stärker Rechnung tragen.

Der Beitrag ist der Übersetzung des 2005 erschienenen Buches „Situational Analysis“ von Adele E. Clarke entnommen. Wesentliche Teile entstammen dem. Kapitel sowie dem Prolog. Die Übersetzung aus dem amerikanischen Englischleistete Juliane Sarnes. Das Literaturverzeichnis wurde für diesen Abdruck stark gekürzt. Weitere Hinweise finden sich deswegen auf http://www.situationsanalysis.com/ bzw. in den Buch ausgaben. Die deutsche Ausgabe der „Situationsanalyse“ wird von Reiner Keller (in der Reihe „Interdisziplinäre Diskursforschung“) herausgegeben und erscheint 2011 im VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Redaktionelle Bearbeitungen des vorliegenden Beitrages wurden von Günter Mey und Reiner Keller vorgenommen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Becker, Howard S. (1970 [1967]). Whose side are we on? In Howard S. Becker (Hrsg.), Sociological work: Method and substance (S.123–134). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Howard S. (1973 [1963]). Outsiders: Außenseiter. Zur Soziologie abweichenden Verhaltens. Frankfurt/M.: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhabha, Homi (2000 [1994]). Die Verortung der Kultur. Tübingen: Stauffenberg Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, Herbert (1980 [1969]). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowker, Geoffrey & Star, Susan L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canguilhem, George (1974 [1943]). Das Normale und das Pathologische. München: Hanser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, James W. (2002). Cultural studies and symbolic interactionism: Notes in critique and tribute to Norman Denzin. Studies in Symbolic Interaction, 25,199–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, Kathy (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In Norman Denzin & Yvonne Lincoln (Hrsg.), Handbook of qualitative research (2. Aufl., S.509–536). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, Kathy (2006). Constructing grounded theory. A -practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Adele E. (2011 [2005]). Situationsanalyse. Grounded Theory nach dem Postmodern Turn. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Harry (1981). Knowledge and controversy: Studies of modern natural science. Social Studies of Science, 11,1–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, Kerry (1997). Replacing theory in ethnography: A postmodern view. Qualitative Inquiry, 3(3)/343–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, Norman (1992). Symbolic interactionism and cultural studies: The politics of interpretation. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingwall, Robert (1999). On the nonnegotiable in sociological life. In Barry Glasner & Rosalie Hertz (Hrsg.), Qualitative sociology and everyday life (S.215–225). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingwall, Robert & Strong, Phil M. (1985). The interactional study of organizations: A critique and reformation. Urban Life, 14(2), 205–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Essed, Philomena & Goldberg, David T. (2002). Cloning cultures: The social injustices of sameness. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 25(6), 1066–1082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fosket, Jennifer R. (2002). Breast cancer risk and the politics of prevention, Doctoral dissertation in Sociology, University of California, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel (1973 [1961]). Wahnsinn und Gesellschaß. Eine Geschichte des Wahns im Zeitalter der Vernunft. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel (1974 [1966]). Die Ordnung der Dinge. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel (1988 [1963]). Die Geburt der Klinik. Eine Archäologie des ärztlichen Blicks. Frankfurt/M.: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, Barney G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, Barney G. (1992). Emergence versus forcing: Basics of grounded theory Analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, Barney G. (2002). Constructivist grounded theory? Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/ Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(3), Art. 12, www.nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0203125.

  • Gramsci, Antonio (1991–1999). Gefängnishefte (hrsg. von Klaus Bochmann und Wolfgang Fritz Haug, 10 Bände). Hamburg: Argument.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Peter M. (1997). Meta-power, social organization, and the shaping of social action. Symbolic Interaction, 20(4), 397–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Peter M. & McGinty, Patrick J. W. (2002). Social organization across space and time: The policy process, mesodomain analysis, and breadth of perspective. In Sing C. Chew & David Knottnerus (Hrsg.), Structure, culture and history: Recent issues in social theory (S.303–322). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammonds, Evelyn M. (1994). Black (w)holes and the geometry of black female sexuality. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 6,126–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, Donna J. (1989). Primate visions: Gender, race, and nature in the world of modern science. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, Donna J. (1995 [1991]). Situiertes Wissen: Die Wissenschaftsfrage im Feminismus und das Privileg einer partialen Perspektive. In Donna J. Haraway, Die Neuerfindung der Natur: Primaten, Cyborgs und Frauen (S.73–97). Frankfurt/M.: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, Donna J. (1997). Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium. In Donna J. Haraway, Modesty_Witneness@Second_Millenium. FemaleMan©_Meets_OncoMouse™: Feminism and technoscience (S.23–39). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, Donna J. (2003). The companion species manifesto: Dogs, people, and significant otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Scott R. (2001). What can interactionism contribute to the study of inequality? The case of marriage and beyond. Symbolic Interaction, 24(4), 455–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, Everett C. (1971). The sociological eye. Chicago: Aldine Atherton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lather, Parti (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, John (1999). After ANT: Complexity, naming and topology. In John Law & John Hassard (Hrsg.), Actor network theory and after (S.1–14). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, Karen (1996). Rewriting the discovery of grounded theory after 25 years? Journal of Management Inquiry, 5(1), 239–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, Doyle E. (1984). Towards a sociology of the physical world: George Herbert Mead on physical objects. Studies in Symbolic Interaction, 5,105–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, George H. (1968 [1934]). Geist, Identität und Gesellschaft aus der Sicht des Sozialbehavior ismus. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, George H. (1927): „The objective reality of perspectives“. In Edgar S. Brightman (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress of Philosophy 1-26 (S.75–85). New York: Longmanns, Green & Co. [dt: Mead, George H. (1972 ). Die objektive Realität von Perspektiven. In Werner Bühl (Hrsg.), Verstehende Soziologie, Grundzüge und Entwicklungstendenzen (S. 100–113). München: Nymphenburger Verlagshandlung].

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Gale (1997). Introduction: Context and method in qualitative research. In Gale Miller & Robert Dingwall (Hrsg.), Context and method in qualitative research (S.1–11). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, Charles W. (1940). Situated actions and vocabularies of motive. American Sociological Review, 6, 904–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrione, Thomas J. (1985). Situated interaction. Studies in Symbolic Interaction, Supplement 1, 161–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poovey, Mary (1998). A history of the modern fact: Problems of knowledge in the sciences of wealth and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard (1981 [1979]). Der Spiegel der Natur. Eine Kritik der Philosophie. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, Edward (1979). Orientalismus. Frankfurt/M.: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwalbe, Michael; Goodwin, Sandra; Schrock, Douglas; Thompson, Shealy & Wolkomir, Michele (2000). Generic processes in the reproduction of inequality: An interactionist analysis. Social Forces, 79, 419–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, Steven & Schaffer, Simon (1985). Leviathan and the air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the experimental life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, Susan Leigh (1983). Simplification in scientific work: An example from neuroscience research. Social Studies of Science, 23, 208–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, Susan Leigh (1989). Regions of the mind: Brain research and the quest for scientific certainty. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, Susan Leigh (1991). The sociology of the invisible: The primacy of work in the writings of Anselm Strauss. In David R. Maines (Hrsg.), Social organization and social processes: Essays in honor of Anselm Strauss (S.265–283). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stepan, Nancy (1986). Race and gender: The role of analogy in science. Isis, 77, 261–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Anselm L. (1978). A social worlds perspective. Studies in Symbolic Interaction, 1,119–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Anselm L. (1979). Negotiations: Varities, contexts, -processes and social order. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Anselm L. (1991 [1987]). Grundlagen qualitativer Sozialforschung. Datenanalyse und Theoriebildung in der empirischen soziologischen Forschung. München: Fink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Anselm L. (1993). Continual permutations of action. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Anselm L. (1995). Notes on the nature and development of general theories. Qualitative Inquiry, 2(1), 7–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Anselm L. & Corbin, Juliet (1996 [1990]). Grounded Theory: Grundlagen Qualitativer Sozialforschung. Weinheim: Beltz, Psychologie Verlags Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Anselm L. & Corbin, Juliet (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2. Aufl.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, William I. & Thomas, Dorothy S. (1970 [1928]). Situations defined as real are real in their consequences. In Gregory P. Stone & Harvey A. Farberman (Hrsg.), Social psychology through symbolic interaction (S.154–155). Waltham, MA: Xerox College Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traweek, Sharon (2000). Faultlines. In Roddey Reid & Sharon Traweek (Hrsg.), Doing science and culture (S.21–48). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsing, Anna L. (1993). In the realm of the diamond queen: Marginalities in out of the way places. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, David (2000). Masons, trixters, and cartographers: Comparative studies in the sociology of scientific and indigenous knowledge. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Adele E. Clarke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Günter Mey Katja Mruck

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Clarke, A.E. (2011). Von der Grounded-Theory-Methodologie zur Situationsanalyse. In: Mey, G., Mruck, K. (eds) Grounded Theory Reader. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93318-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93318-4_10

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-17103-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-93318-4

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation