Skip to main content

The Influence of Close Friends on Adolescent Substance Use: Does Popularity Matter?

  • Chapter

Abstract

The goal of this study was to determine whether adolescents’ relative popularity plays a protective role against peer influences towards substance abuse as suggested by a Social Discrepancy model (Bukowski et al., 2008), or whether, conversely, adolescents’ relative popularity represents a vulnerability factor as suggested by the Socialization-Popularity model (Allen et al., 2005). To achieve this goal, we used a sample of 531 adolescents followed from ages 10-11 through ages 14-15. Participants and their friends provided self-reports of their substance use. Peers rated participants and their friends in terms of popularity. Results suggest that having friends that consume more at ages 12-13 predicts an increase in substance use from ages 10-11 to ages 14-15. In line with the Socialization-Popularity model, but opposite to the Social Discrepancy model, adolescents who were more popular were at greater risk of adopting the drug- related behaviors of their friends, particularly if these friends were also popular. Theoretical and practical implications of these results are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aiken, L.S. et West, S.G. (1991). Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alder, P.A., & Alder, P. (1995). Dynamics of inclusion and exclusion in preadolescents cliques. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 145-162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, C., Piazza, M., Mekos, D., & Valente, T. (2001). Peers, schools, and adolescent cigarette smoking. Journal of Adolescent Health, 29, 22-30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J. P., Porter, M. R., McFarland, C. F., Marsh, P. A., & McElhaney, K. B. (2005). The two faces of adolescents’ success with peers: Adolescent popularity, social adaptation, and deviant behavior. Child Development, 76, 1-14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J. P., Weissberg, R. P., & Hawkins, J. A. (1989). The Relation Between Values and Social Competence in Early Adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 25(3), 458-464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison, PD. (2001). Multiple Imputation: Basics (pp. 27-29). In Santoyo D. (ED), Missing Data. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aloise-Young, P. A., Graham, J. W., & Hansen, W. B. (1994). Peer influence on smoking initiation during early adolescence: A comparison of group members and group outsiders. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 281-287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, J. A., Tildesley, E., Hops, H., & Li, F. (2002). The influence of peers on young adult substance use. Health Psychology, 21, 349–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asch, S.E. (1952). Social psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Asher, S. R., & McDonald, K. L. (2008). The behavioral basis of acceptance, rejection, and perceived popularity. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski, &B. Laursen (Eds.), handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 232-248). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: A social learning analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1968). Social-Learning theory of identification processes. In D.A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization and research. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berndt, T. J., & Keefe, K. (1995). Friends’ influence on adolescents’ adjustment to school. Child Development, 66, 1312-1329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, W. D. & Feldman, S. (1985). Multiple Regression in practice. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blishen, B. R., Carroll, W. K., & Moore, C. (1987). The 1981 socioeconomic index for occupations in Canada. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 24, 465-488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosari, B., & Carey, K. B. (2001). Peer influences on college drinking: A review of the research. Journal of Substance Abuse, 13, 391–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. B., Bakken, J. P., Ameringer, S. W., & Mahon, S.D. (2008). A Comprehensive conceptualization of the peer influence process in adolescence. In M. J. Prinstein & K. A. Dodge (Eds.), Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bukowski, W. M., Sippola, L. K., & Newcomb, A. F., (2000). Variations in patterns of attraction to same- and other-sex peers during early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 36, 147-154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bukowski, W. M., Velsaquez, A. M., & Brendgen, M. (2008). Variations in patterns of peer influence : Considerations of self and other (pp. 125-140). In M. J. Prinstein & K. A. Dodge (Eds.), Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cillessen, A. H. N., & Mayeux, L. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental chnges in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75, 147-163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, G. L., & Prinstein, M. J. (2006). Peer contagion of aggression and health-risk behavior among adolescent males: An experimental investigation of effects on public conduct and private attitudes. Child Development, 77, 967-983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, G. L. (2003). Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 808 – 822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coie, J.D. (2004). The impact of negative social experiences on the development of antisocial behaviour (pp. 243-267). In: J.B. Kupersmidt & K.A. Dodge (Eds), Children’s peer relations: From development to intervention. American Psychological Association, Washington, D. C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coie, J. D., & Dodge, K. A. (1983). Continuities and changes in children s social status: A five-year longitudinal study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29, 261–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557-570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, J.K., Lindenberg, S., Verhulst, F.C., Ormel, J., & Veenstra, R. (2009). The relation between popularity and aggressive, destructive, and normbreaking behaviors: Moderating effects of athletic abilities, physical attractiveness, and prosociality. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 19, 401-13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, W. P., & Kemery, E. R. (1987). Failure to detect moderating effects: Is multicollinearity the problem? Psychological Bulletin, 102, 418-420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, P. (1989). Jocks and burnouts: Social categories and identity in the high school. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eder, D. (1985). The cycle of popularity: interpersonal-relations among female adolescents. Sociology of Education, 58, 154-65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engels, R. C. M. E., Knibbe, R. A., De Vries, H., Drop, M. J., & van Breukelen, G. J. P. (1999). Influences of parental and friends’ smoking and drinking on adolescent use: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 337-361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149-1160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fergusson, D.M., Vitaro, F., Wanner, B., & Brendgen, M. (2007). Protective and compensatory factors mitigating the influence of deviant friends on delinquent behaviours during early adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 30, 33-50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, S. E., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Eccles, J. S. (2005). Parents, peers, and problem behavior: A longitudinal investigation of the impact of relationship perceptions and characteristics on the development of adolescent problem behavior. Developmental Psychology, 41(2), 401-413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J.W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, P.H. (1999). The ontogenesis of social dominance: A strategy-based evolutionary perspective. Developmental Review, 19, 97-132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynie, D.L. (2001). Delinquent peers revisited: Does network structure matter? American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1013-1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henly, G. A., & Winters, K. C. (1989). Development of psychosocial scales for the assessment of adolescent alcohol and drug involvement. International Journal of the Addictions, 24, 973-1001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, D. B. (1996). The parental and peer contexts of adolescent deviance: An algebra of interpersonal influences. Journal of Drug Issues, 26, 289–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiesner, J., Cadinu, F., Poulin, F., & Bucci, M. (2002). Group identification in early adolescence: Its relation with peer adjustment and its moderator effect on peer influence, Child Development, 73, 196–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreft, G. G., de Leeuw, J., & Aiken, L. S. (1995). The effects of different forms of centering in hierarchical linear models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30,1-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupersmidt, J. B., Burchinal, M., & Patterson, C. J. (1995). Developmental patterns of childhood peer relations as predictors of externalizing behavior problems. Development and Psychopathology, 7, 825-843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luthar, S. S., & McMahon, T. J. (1996). Peer reputation among inner-city adolescents: Structure and correlates. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 6, 581-603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merten, D.E. (1997). The Meaning of meanness: Popularity, competition, and conflict among junior high school. Sociology of Education, 70, 175-191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course persistent antisocial behaviour: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674-701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newcomb, A. F., & Bagwell, C. L. (1995). Children’s friendship relations: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 306-347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paetsch, J. J., & Bertrand, L. D. (1997). The relationship between peer, social, and school factors, and delinquency among youth. Journal of School Health, 67, 27–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, J. G., & Asher, S. R. (1993). Friendship and friendship quality in middle childhood: Links with peer group acceptance and feelings of loneliness and social dissatisfaction. Developmental Psychology, 29, 611-621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkhurst, J. T., & Hopmeyer, A. (1998). Sociometric Popularity and peer-perceived popularity: Two distinct dimensions of peer status. Journal of Early Adolescence, 18, 125-144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interaction effects in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437-448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prentice, D.A. (2008). Mobilizing and weakening peer influence as mechanisms for changing behavior: Implications for alcohol intervention programs (pp 161-180). In M. J. Prinstein & K. A. Dodge (Eds.), Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinstein, M. J., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2003). Forms and functions of adolescent peer aggression associated with high levels of peer status. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 310–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prinstein, M. J. & Dodge, K. A. (2008). Current issues in peer influence research. In M. J. Prinstein & K. A. Dodge (Eds.), Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinstein, M. J., Boergers, J., & Spirito, A. (2001). Adolescents and their friends health-risk behavior: Factors that alter or add to peer influence. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 26, 287–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prinstein, M. J., Meade, C. S., & Cohen, G. L. (2003). Adolescent oral sex, peer popularity, and perceptions of best friends s sexual behavior. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 28, 243–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, A. J., Swenson, L. P., & Waller, E. M. (2004). Overt and relational aggression and perceived popularity: Developmental differences in concurrent and protective relations. Developmental Psychology, 40, 378-387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, J.L. (1997). Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Simons-Morton, B., Haynie, D. L., Crump, A. D., Eitel, P., & Saylor, K. E. (2001). Peer and parent influences on smoking and drinking among early adolescents. Health Education & Behavior, 28, 95–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, E. A., & Prinstein, M. J. (2005). Peer contagion of depressogenic attributional styles among adolescents: A longitudinal study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 25-37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urberg, K. A., Cheng, C., & Shyu, S. (1991). Grade changes in peer influence on adolescent cigarette smoking: A comparison on two measures. Addictive Behaviors, 16, 21–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urberg, K. A., Shyu, S. J., & Liang, J. (1990). Peer influence in adolescent smoking. Addictive Behaviors, 15, 247-255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitaro, F., Pedersen, S., & Brendgen, M. (2007). Children’s disruptiveness, peer rejection, friends’ deviancy, and delinquent behaviors: A process-oriented approach. Development and Psychopathology, 19, 433-453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitaro, F., Tremblay, R. E., Kerr, M., Pagani, L. S., & Bukowski, W. M. (1997). Disruptiveness, friends’ characteristics, and delinquency: A test of two competing models of development. Child Development, 68, 676-689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, S.G., Aiken, L.S., & Krull, J.L. (1996). Experimental personality designs: Analyzing categorical by continuous variable interactions. Journal of Personality, 64, 1-48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winters, K. C., Stinchfield, R. D., Henly, G. A., & Schwartz, R. H. (1990-91). Validity of adolescent self-report of alcohol and other drug involvement. The International Journal of Addiction, 25, 1379-1395.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Angela Ittel Hans Merkens Ludwig Stecher

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fallu, JS., Brière, F., Vitaro, F., Cantin, S., Borge, A. (2011). The Influence of Close Friends on Adolescent Substance Use: Does Popularity Matter?. In: Ittel, A., Merkens, H., Stecher, L. (eds) Jahrbuch Jugendforschung. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93116-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93116-6_9

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-17656-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-93116-6

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics