Advertisement

Aktuelle Entwicklungen in der nordamerikanischen Umweltsoziologie

Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Die Beschäftigung mit Umweltproblemen Ist grundsätzlich ein Interdisziplinäres Unterfangen, und zwar sowohl In den Sozial- als auch in den Naturwissenschaften. Dennoch wird die zentrale Rolle der Sozialwissenschaften im Allgemeinen und der Soziologie im Besonderen erst langsam erkannt (vgl. Brewer and Stern 2005). Diese Erkenntnis rührt vom steigenden Bewusstseln her, dass Umweltprobleme soziale Probleme sind: Sie sind das Ergebnis menschlichen Handelns und werden als problematisch angesehen, weil sie wiederum Menschen und andere Lebewesen beeinflussen (Dunlap 2007). Es ist daher nicht überraschend, dass Soziologen in den letzten 30 Jahren Immer größeres Interesse an Umweltthemen entwickelt haben, und dass sich die Umweltsoziologie in Nordamerika fest etablieren konnte.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Weiterführende Literatur

  1. Dunlap, Riley E. (2010): The Maturation and Diversification of Environmental Sociology: From Constructivism and Realism to Agnosticism and Pragmatism. In: Redclift, Michael und Graham Woodgate (Hrsg.), International Handbook of Environmental Sociology. 2. Auflage, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 15–32.Google Scholar
  2. Dunlap, Riley E., Frederick H. Büttel, Peter Dickens und August Gijswrjt (Hrsg.) (2002): Sociological Theory and the Environment: Classical Foundations, Contemporary Insights. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  3. Harper, Charles L. (2008): Environment and Society: Human Perspectives on Environmental Issues. 4. Auflage. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  4. McCright, Aaron M. und Riley E. Dunlap (2010): Anti-Reflexivity: The American Conservative Movement's Success in Undermining Climate Science and Policy. Theory, Culture and Society 26 (2-3): 100–133.Google Scholar
  5. Redclift, Michael und Graham Woodgate (Hrsg.) (2010): International Handbook of Environmental Sociology. 2. Auflage. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Zitierte Literatur

  1. Zitierte Literatur$$$Albrecht, Stan L. und Armond L. Mauss (1975): The Environment as a Social Problem. In: Mauss, Armond L. (Hrsg.), Social Problems as Social Movements. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, 566–605.Google Scholar
  2. Barbosa, Luis C. (2000): The Brazilian Amazon Rainforest. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  3. Beck, Ulrich (1986): RisikoGesellschaft: Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  4. Benton, Ted. (2001): Environmental Sociology: Controversy and Continuity. Sosiologisk Tidsskrift 9 (1): 5–48.Google Scholar
  5. Bevc, Christine A., Brent K. Marshall und J. Steven Picou (2007): Environmental Justice and Toxic Eposure: Toward a Spatial Model of Physical Health and Psychological Well-Being. Social Science Research 36 (1): 48–67.Google Scholar
  6. Brewer, Gary D. und Paul C. Stern (Hrsg.) (2005): Decision Making for the Environment: Social and Behavioral Science Research Priorities. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  7. Brulle, Robert J. und David Naguib Pellow (2006): Environmental Justice: Human Health and Environmental Inequalities. Annual Review of Public Health 27: 103–124.Google Scholar
  8. Bunker, Stephen G. (1985): Underdeveloping the Amazon: Extraction, Unequal Exchange, and the Failure of the Modern State. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bunker, Stephen G. (1996): Raw Material and the Global Economy: Oversights and Distortions in Industrial Ecology. Society and Natural Resources 9 (4): 419–430.Google Scholar
  10. Bunker, Stephen G. (2005): How Ecologically Uneven Development Put the Spin on the Treadmill of Production. Organization & Environment 18 (1): 38–54.Google Scholar
  11. Burns, Thomas J., Edward L. Kick und Byron L. Davis (2003): Theorizing and Rethinking Linkages Between the Natural Environment and the Modern World System: Deforestation in the Late 20thCentury. Journal of World-System Research 9 (2): 357–390.Google Scholar
  12. Buttel, Frederick H. (1987): New Directions in Environmental Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology 13: 465–488.Google Scholar
  13. Buttel, Frederick H. (2000): World Society, the Nation-State, and Environmental Protection: A Comment on Frank, Hironaka, and Schofer. American Sociological Review 65 (1): 117–121.Google Scholar
  14. Buttel, Frederick H. (2003): Environmental Sociology and the Explanation of Environmental Reform. Organization & Environment 16 (3): 306–344.Google Scholar
  15. Buttel, Frederick H. (2004): The Treadmill of Production: An Appreciation, Assessment, and Agenda for Research. Organization & Environment 17 (3): 323–336.Google Scholar
  16. Buttel, Frederick H. (2006): Globalization, Environmental Reform, and U.S. Hegemony. In: Spaargaren, Gert, Arthur P. J. Mol and Frederick H. Büttel (Hrsg.), Governing Environmental Flows: Global Challenges to Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 157–184.Google Scholar
  17. Carolan, Michael S. (2004): Ecological Modernization Theory: What About Consumption? Society & Natural Resources 17 (3): 247–260.Google Scholar
  18. Catton, William R., Jr. (1980): Overshoot: The Ecological Basis of Revolutionary Change. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  19. Catton, William R., Jr. (1987): Homo Colossus and the Technological Turn-Around. Sociological Spectrum 6 (2): 121–147.Google Scholar
  20. Catton, William R., Jr. und Riley E. Dunlap (1978): Environmental Sociology: A New Paradigm. The American Sociologist 13 (4): 41–49.Google Scholar
  21. Catton, William R., Jr. und Riley E. Dunlap (1980): A New Ecological Paradigm for Post-Exuberant Sociology. American Behavioral Scientist 24 (1): 15–47.Google Scholar
  22. Chew, Sing C. (2001): World Environmental Degradation: Accumulation, Urbanization and Before-station 3000 B.C.—A.D. 2000. Lanham, MD: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
  23. Davidson, Debra J. und Scott Frickel (2004): Understanding Environmental Governance. Organization & Environment 17 (4): 471–492.Google Scholar
  24. Dietz, Thomas und Eugene A. Rosa (1994): Rethinking the Environmental Impacts of Population, Affluence and Technology. Human Ecology Review 1 (2): 277–300.Google Scholar
  25. Dietz, Thomas und Eugene A. Rosa. (1997): Effects of Population and Affluence on CO2 Emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 94 (1): 175–179.Google Scholar
  26. Dietz, Thomas und Paul C. Stern. (Hrsg.) (2002): New Tools for Environmental Policy. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  27. Downey, Liam (2005): The Unintended Significance of Race: Environmental Racial Inequality in Detroit. Social Forces 83 (3): 971–1008.Google Scholar
  28. Downey, Liam (2006): Using Geographical Information Systems to Reconceptualize Spatial Relationships and Ecological Context. American Journal of Sociology 112 (2): 567–612.Google Scholar
  29. Dunlap, Riley E. (1997): The Evolution of Environmental Sociology: A Brief History and Assessment of the American Experience. In: Redclift, Michael und Graham Woodgate (Hrsg.), The international Handbook of Environmental Sociology. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar, 21–39.Google Scholar
  30. Dunlap, Riley E. (2002): Environmental Sociology: A Personal Perspective on Its First Quarter Century. Organization and Environment 15 (1): 10–29.Google Scholar
  31. Dunlap, Riley E. (2007): Sociology of the Environment. In: Ritzer, George (Hrsg.), The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, Vol. 4. Maiden, MA: Blackwell, 1417–1422.Google Scholar
  32. Dunlap, Riley E. und William R. Catton, Jr. (1979): Environmental Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology 5: 243–273.Google Scholar
  33. Dunlap, Riley E. und William R. Catton, Jr. (1983): What Environmental Sociologists Have in Common (Whether Concerned with ‚Built‘ or ‚Natural‘ Environments). Sociological Inquiry 53 (2-3): 113–135.Google Scholar
  34. Dunlap, Riley E. und William R. Catton, Jr. (1994): Struggling with Human Exemptionalism: The Rise, Decline and Revitalization of Environmental Sociology. The American Sociologist 25 (1): 5–30.Google Scholar
  35. Dunlap, Riley E. und William R. Catton, Jr. (2002): Which Functions of the Environment Do We Study? A Comparison of Environmental and Natural Resource Sociology. Society and Natural Resources 15 (3): 239–249.Google Scholar
  36. Dunlap, Riley E., Loren A. Lutzenhiser und Eugene A. Rosa (1994): Understanding Environmental Problems: A Sociological Perspective. In: Bürgenmeier, Beat (Hrsg.), Economy, Environment, and Technology. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 27–49.Google Scholar
  37. Dunlap, Riley E. und Richard York (2008): The Globalization of Environmental Concern and the Limits of the Post-Materialist Explanation: Evidence from Four Cross-National Surveys. Sociological Quarterly 49 (3): 529–563.Google Scholar
  38. Ehrhardt-Martinez, Karen, Edward M. Crenshaw und J. Craig Jenkins (2002): Deforestation and the Environmental Kuznets Curve: A Cross-National Investigation of Intervening Mechanisms. Social Science Quarterly 83 (1): 226–243.Google Scholar
  39. Fischer-Kowalski, Marina und Christof Amann (2001): Beyond IPAT and Kuznets Curves: Globalization as a Vital Factor in Analyzing the Environmental Impact of Socio-Economic Metabolism. Population and Environment 23 (1): 7–47.Google Scholar
  40. Fischer-Kowalski, Marina und Helmut Haberl (Hrsg.) (2007): Ecological Transitions and Global Change. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  41. Fisher, Dana R. und William R. Freudenburg (2001): Ecological Modernization and Its Critics: Assessing the Past and Looking Toward the Future. Society & Natural Resources 14 (8): 701–709.Google Scholar
  42. Fisher, Dana R. und William R. Freudenburg (2004): Postindustrialization and Environmental Quality: An Empirical Analysis of the Environmental State. Social Forces 83 (1): 157–188.Google Scholar
  43. Fisher, Dana R. und William R. Freudenburg (2006): Ecological Efficiency, Disproportionality and Methodological Precision: On the Importance of Linking Methods to Theory. Social Forces, URL: www.socialforces.unc.edu/epub/rejoinders/FisherFreudenburgRejoinder_FINAL.pdf.
  44. Frank, David John (1999): The Social Bases of Environmental Treaty Ratification, 1900-1990. Sociological Inquiry 69 (4): 523–550.Google Scholar
  45. Frank, David John, Ann Hironaka und Evan Schofer (2000): The Nation-State and the Natural Environment over the Twentieth Century. American Sociological Review 65 (1): 96–116.Google Scholar
  46. Freese, Lee (1997): Environmental Connections. Supplement 1 (Part B) to Advances in Human Ecology. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  47. Frey, R. Scott (2001): The Hazardous Waste Stream in the World-System. In: Frey, R. Scott (Hrsg.), The Environment and Society Reader. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 106–120.Google Scholar
  48. Frey, R. Scott (2003): The Transfer of Core-Based Hazardous Production Processes to the Export Processing Zones of the Periphery: The Maquiladora Centers of Northern Mexico. Journal of World-System Research 9 (2): 317–354.Google Scholar
  49. Freudenburg, William R. (1997): Contamination, Corrosion and the Social Order: An Overview. Current Sociology 45 (1): 41–57.Google Scholar
  50. Freudenburg, William R. (2005): Privileged Access, Privileged Accounts: Toward a Socially Structured Theory of Resources and Discourses. Social Forces 84 (1): 88–114.Google Scholar
  51. Frickel, Scott und Debra J. Davidson (2004): Building Environmental States: Legitimacy and Rationalization in Sustainability and Governance. International Sociology 19 (1): 89–110.Google Scholar
  52. Goldman, Michael (2002): Review of Globalization and Environmental Reform by A. P. J. Mol. Contemporary Sociology 31 (6): 727–728.Google Scholar
  53. Goldman, Michael (2005): Imperial Nature : The World Bank and Struggles for Social Justice in the Age of Globalization. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Gould, Kenneth A., David N. Pellow und Allan Schnaiberg (2008): The Treadmill of Production. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  55. Gould, Kenneth A., Allan Schnaiberg und Adam S. Weinberg (1996): Local Environmental Struggles: Citizen Activism in the Treadmill of Production. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Grant, Don und Andrew W. Jones (2003): Are Subsidiaries More Prone to Pollute? New Evidence from the EPA's Toxics Release Inventory. Social Science Quarterly 84 (1): 162–173.Google Scholar
  57. Grant, Don Sherman, II, Andrew W. Jones und Albert J. Bergesen (2002): Organizational Size and Pollution: The Case of the U.S. Chemical Industry. American Sociological Review 67 (3): 389–407.Google Scholar
  58. Heberlein, Thomas A. (1974): The Three Fixes: Technological, Cognitive and Structural. In: Field, Donald R., James C. Barron und Burl F. Long. (Hrsg.), Water and Community Development: Social and Economic Perspectives. Ann Arbor, MI: Ann Arbor Science, 279–296.Google Scholar
  59. Jacques, Peter, Riley E. Dunlap und Mark Freeman (2008): The Organization of Denial: Conser-vatlve Think Tanks and Environmental Scepticism. Environmental Politics 17 (3): 349–385.Google Scholar
  60. Jarvikoski, TImo (1996): The Relation of Nature and Society In Marx and Durkheim. Acta Sociologica 39 (1): 73–86.Google Scholar
  61. Jorgenson, Andrew K. (2003): Consumption and Environmental Degradation: A Cross-National Analysis of the Ecological Footprint. Social Problems 50 (3): 374–394.Google Scholar
  62. Jorgenson, Andrew K. (2007): Does Foreign Investment Harm the Air We Breathe and the Water We Drink? A Cross-National Study of Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Organic Water Pollution in Less-Developed Nations, 1975-2000. Organization & Environment 20 (2): 137–156.Google Scholar
  63. Jorgenson, Andrew K. und Thomas J. Burns (2007): The Political-Economic Causes of Changes in the Ecological Footprints of Nations, 1999-2001: A Quantitative Investigation. Social Science Research 36 (2): 371–394.Google Scholar
  64. Kroll-Smith, Steven, Stephen R. Couch und Adeline G. Levine (2002): Technological Hazards and Disasters. In: Dunlap, Riley E. und William MIchelson (Hrsg.), Handbook of Environmental Sociology. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 295–328.Google Scholar
  65. Luft, Rachel E. (2008): After Katrina: A Second Generation of Books. Sociological Inquiry 78 (2): 258–263.Google Scholar
  66. Lutzenhiser, Loren (1993): Social and Behavioral Aspects of Energy Use. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 18: 247–289.Google Scholar
  67. Marshall, Brent K. (1999): Globalization, Environmental Degradation, and Ulrich Beck's Risk Society. Environmental Values 8 (2): 253–275.Google Scholar
  68. Marshall, Brent K., J. Steven Plcou und Duane Gill (2003): Terrorism as Disaster: Selected Commonalities and Long-Term Recovery for 9/11 Survivors. Research in Social Problems and Public Policy 11: 73–96.Google Scholar
  69. Marshall, Brent K., J. Steven Plcou und Jan Schlichtmann (2004): Technological Disasters, Litigation Stress and the Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms. Law & Policy 26 (2): 289–307.Google Scholar
  70. Meyer, John W., David John Frank, Ann Kironaka, Evan Schofer und Nancy Brandon Tuma (1997): The Structuring of a World Environmental Regime, 1870-1990. International Organization 51 (4): 623–651.Google Scholar
  71. Mol, Arthur P. J. (2001): Globalization and Environmental Reform. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  72. Mol, Arthur P. J. (2006): From Environmental Sociologies to Environmental Sociology ? A Comparison of U.S. and European Environmental Sociology. Organization & Environment 19 (1): 28–45.Google Scholar
  73. Mol, Arthur P. J. und David A. Sonnenfeld (Hrsg.) (2000): Ecological Modernisation Around the World: Perspectives and Critical Debates. Essex, UK: Frank Cass & Co.Google Scholar
  74. Mol, Arthur P. J. und Gert Spaargaren (2000): Ecological Modernization Theory in Debate: A Review. Environmental Politics 9 (1): 17–49.Google Scholar
  75. Mol, Arthur P. J. und Gert Spaargaren (2002): Ecological Modernization and the Environmental State. In: Mol, Arthur P. J. und Frederic H. Büttel (Hrsg.), The Environmental State Under Pressure. Boston: JAI Press, 33–52.Google Scholar
  76. Mol, Arthur P. J. und Gert Spaargaren (2005): From Additions and Withdrawals to Environmental Flows: Reframing Debates in the Environmental Social Sciences. Organization & Environment 18 (1): 91–107.Google Scholar
  77. Moore, Jason W. (2003): The Modern World System as Environmental History: Ecology and the Rise of Capitalism. Theory and Society 32 (32): 307–377.Google Scholar
  78. Pellow, David Naguib (2002): Garbage Wars: The Struggle for Environmental Justice in Chicago. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  79. Pellow, David Naguib und Robert J. Brülle (Hrsg.) (2005): Power, Justice, and the Environment: A Critical Appraisal of the Environmental Justice Movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  80. Picou, J. Steven und Brent K. Marshall (2007): Katrina as Paradigm-Shift: Reflections on Disaster Research in the Twenty-First Century. In: Brunsma, David, David Overfelt und J. Steven Picou (Hrsg.), The Sociology of Katrina: Perspectives on a Modern Catastrohe. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1–20.Google Scholar
  81. Picou, J. Steven, Brent K. Marshall und Duane Gill (2004): Disaster, Litigation and the Corrosive Community. Social Forces 84 (4): 1497–1526.Google Scholar
  82. Rice, James (2008): Ecological Unequal Exchange: Consumption, Equity, and Unsustainable Structural Relationships with the Global Economy. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 48 (1): 43–72.Google Scholar
  83. Roberts, J. Timmons (1996): Predicting Participation in Environmental Treaties: A World-System Analysis. Sociological Inquiry 66 (1): 38–57.Google Scholar
  84. Roberts, J. Timmons und Peter E. Grimes (1997): Carbon Intensity and Economic Development 1962-1991. World Development 25 (2): 191–198.Google Scholar
  85. Roberts, J. Timmons und Peter E. Grimes (2002): World-System Theory and the Environment: Toward a New Synthesis. In: Dunlap, Riley E., Frederic H. Büttel, Peter Dickens und August Gijswijt (Hrsg.), Sociological Theory and the Environment. Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield, 167–194.Google Scholar
  86. Roberts, J. Timmons, Bradley C. Parks und Alexis A. Vasquez (2004): Who Ratifies Environmental Treaties and Why? Institutionalism, Structuralism and Participation by 192 Nations in 22 Treaties. Global Environmental Politics 4 (3): 22–64.Google Scholar
  87. Rosa, Eugene A., Gary E. Machlis und Kenneth M. Keating. (1988): Energy and Society. Annual Review of Sociology 14:149–172.Google Scholar
  88. Rudel, Thomas K. (1998): Is There a Forest Transition? Deforestation, Reforestation, and Development. Rural Sociology 63 (4): 533–552.Google Scholar
  89. Saha, Robin und Paul Mohai (2005): Historical Context and Hazardous Waste Facility Siting: Understanding Temporal Patterns in Michigan. Social Problems 52 (4): 618–648.Google Scholar
  90. Scheinberg, Anne S. (2003): The Proof of the Pudding: Urban Recycling in North America as a Process of Ecological Modernization. Environmental Politics 12 (1): 49–75.Google Scholar
  91. Schnaiberg, Allan (1975): Social Syntheses of the Societal-Environmental Dialectic: The Role of Distributional Impacts. Social Science Quarterly 56 (1): 5–20.Google Scholar
  92. Schnaiberg, Allan (1980): The Environment: From Surplus to Scarcity. New York: Oxford Uni-versity Press.Google Scholar
  93. Schnaiberg, Allan, David N. Fellow und Adam Weinberg (2002): The Treadmill of Production and the Environmental State. In: Mol, Arthur P. J. und Frederick H. Buttel (Hrsg.), The Environmental State Under Pressure. Boston: JAI Press, 15–32.Google Scholar
  94. Schofer, Evan und Ann Hlronaka. (2005): The Effects of World Society on Environmental Protection Outcomes. Social Forces 84 (1): 25–45.Google Scholar
  95. Shandra, John M., Bruce London, Owen P. Whooley und John B. Williamson (2004): International Nongovernmental Organizations and Carbon Dioxide Emissions in the Developing World: A Quantitative Cross-National Analysis. Sociological Inquiry 74 (4): 520–545.Google Scholar
  96. Shove, Elizabeth und Alan Warde (2002): Inconspicuous Consumption: The Sociology of Consumption, Lifestyles, and the Environment. In: Dunlap, Riley E., Frederick H. Büttel, Peter Dickens und August Gijswijt (Hrsg.), Sociological Theory and the Environment. Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield, 230–251.Google Scholar
  97. Spaargaren, Gert (2003): Sustainable Consumption: A Theoretical and Environmental Policy Perspective. Society & Natural Resources 16 (8): 687–701.Google Scholar
  98. Spaargaren, Gert, Arthur P. J. Mol und Frederick H. Büttel (Hrsg.) (2006): Governing Environmental Flows: Global Challenges to Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  99. Szasz, Andrew und Michael Meuser (2000): Unintended, Inexorable: The Production of Environmental Inequalities in Santa Clara County, California. American Behavioral Scientist 43 (4): 602–632.Google Scholar
  100. Webb, Gary R. (2002): Sociology, Disasters, and Terrorism: Understanding Threats of the New Millennium. Sociological Focus 35 (1): 87–95.Google Scholar
  101. Weinberg, Adam S., David N. Pellow und Allan Schnaiberg (2000): Urban Recycling and the Search for Sustainable Community Development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  102. Wallerstein, Emmanuel (1974): The Modern World-System I. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  103. Yearley, Steven (2005): The Sociology of the Environment and Nature. In: Calhoun, Craig, Chris Rojek und Bryan Turner (Hrsg.), The SAGE Handbook of Sociology. Thousand Oaks, CA, London, UK: Sage, 314–326.Google Scholar
  104. York, Richard (2004): The Treadmill of (Diversifying) Production. Organization & Environment 17 (3): 355–362.Google Scholar
  105. York, Richard und Eugene A. Rosa (2003): Key Challenges to Ecological Modernization Theory. Organization & Environment 16 (3): 273–288.Google Scholar
  106. York, Richard und Eugene A. Rosa (2006): Societal Processes and Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions: Comment on ,Post Industrialization and Environmental Quality: An Empirical Analysis of the Environmental State. Social Forces, URL: www.socialforces.unc.edu/. Stand: 18. August 2010.
  107. York, Richard, Eugene A. Rosa und Thomas Dietz (2003a): Footprints on the Earth: The Environmental Consequences of Modernity. American Sociological Review 68 (2): 279–300.Google Scholar
  108. York, Richard, Eugene A. Rosa und Thomas Dietz (2003b): STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: Analytic Tools for Unpacking the Driving Forces of Environmental Impacts. Ecological Economics 46 (3): 351–365.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2011

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations